and they wonder why Americans have a low opinion of Congress.
More you might like
I’m nostalgic for the days when being insane was something a politician tried to hide instead of flaunt.
(via saywhat-politics)
The Two Strands of Transgender Science
There are two major strands in modern sexology, both going back to the late 19th century. One is binary, gender conservative and interprets gender variation as mental illness; the other is liberal, trans-positive and understands sex and gender as complex continuums.
I have read a lot of transgender history. Too much, probably. This also applies to the science of transgender and the philosophy of transgender.
There is one important lesson I have learned from all of this: Every single original idea had been presented before 1915.
The binary, pathologizing, tradition
100 years ago you would find it all:
The binary theory of two completely separate sexes, male and female, was already there. So was the idea that gender variations are perversions threatening society’s “evolutionary fitness”.
As now, many researchers argued that transgender conditions was caused by variations in the presence of hormones in the womb. This applied to sexual orientation too; many researchers had some difficulty keeping the two apart, then as now.
Others argued that it had to do with bad upbringings, blaming – for instance – strong mothers and weak fathers. Feminists, homosexuals and “primitive”, non-white, people could also be blamed for spreading these “diseases”.
Then, as now, the main fear was of the feminization of boys. Society needed strong, masculine, rational boys to fight wars, colonize the world and govern society, and because of this the emotional, feminine sissies – gay or trans – were a threat to the system.
(Tomboys and FTM transgender were also a problem, but did not constitute the same threat to the social order. After all, the fact that women wanted to be men made sense; the MTFs, on the other hand, had to be mad to desire the life of a woman.)
This binary tradition can be traced from Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing and his book Psychopathia Sexualis in 1886. via the Freudian psychoanalysts and John Money of the 20th century, up to the current autogynephilia theory of Ray Blanchard.
What unifies this tradition is not the explanation for what causes gender dysphoria or gender identity conflicts. The researchers will blame it on inherited degeneracy, hormones or feminist mothers, all depending on the researcher’s natural inclinations and cultural context. What unites them is the need to present gender variation as something unnatural and unacceptable.