February 1, 2012
"I mean literally, why is that last page a full-page splash of Batman actually penetrating Catwoman? Why do we need to see that? What does it accomplish or tell us about the characters that would have been lost if that page had been omitted? The answer is nothing. They just wanted to see Catwoman and Batman bang on a roof. And that is the whole problem with this false notion of “sexually liberated” female characters: These aren’t those women. They’re how dudes want to imagine those women would be — what Wire creator David Simon called writing “men with t*ts.” They read like men’s voices coming out of women’s faces. Or worse, they read like the straight girls who make out with each other at clubs, not because they enjoy making out with women but because they desperately want guys to pay attention to them. This is not about these women wanting things; it’s about men wanting to see them do things, and that takes something that really should be empowering — the idea that women can own their sexuality — and transforms it into yet another male fantasy. It takes away the actual power of the women and turns their “sexual liberation” into just another way for dudes to get off."

The Big Sexy Problem with Superheroines and Their ‘Liberated Sexuality (via sociolab)

THANK YOU.

(via rosemary--and--time)

  1. unsolicitedopinion-blog reblogged this from rosemary--and--time
  2. rosemary--and--time reblogged this from socio-logic
  3. isthatdrughumor reblogged this from socio-logic
  4. socio-logic reblogged this from sociolab
  5. sociolab posted this