asker portrait
Anonymous asked: what's extreme is people like you not realizing that sometimes diversity can go too far. When characters are made black or disabled or gay for no reason it hurts the story and it hurts the cause of the people who are supposedly being represented.

destielhiseyesopened:

blue-author:

I like how you sent me an ask claiming that no one says a thing except people rhetorically making fun of the position that no one actually holds, and then you send me an ask clarifying that you hold exactly the same position.

I’m kind tempted to just not address anything else you said and just marvel in the perfection of that.

What’s the reason for making a character white? What’s the reason for making a character straight? What’s the reason for making a character abled or neurotypical or cis?

When you assume that making a character Other relative to yourself weakens the narrative, you’re revealing a terrible thing about yourself: that you can’t imagine that those people have backstories and inner lives the way that you do.

Every single person in a fictional narrative is ultimately there because a writer decided they needed to be there, but when the person looks like you and matches your expectations, you accept that this person who was made up for the plot had a life full of events that led them to the point where they’re appearing on the screen or page.

But when your expectations aren’t met, you start saying it’s forced. You can’t accept that events led them here because you don’t grant them the kind of life that you know you have. Your empathy does not extend to them. 

Look at how many white people think they can relate to a little girl in an industrial orphanage who falls in with a capitalist robber baron during the Great Depression more than they can relate to a little girl in the foster system in modern New York who falls in with a career politician, all because of a difference of race. The original Annie’s situation and world were only slightly less alien to us than the Victorian period, but making her white somehow makes her relatable in a way that a little girl who clearly exists in our world isn’t.

The fact is, empathy is linked to imagination and we can (and do!) relate to people who are literally alien beings in literally alien worlds. The choice not to relate to Quvenzhané Wallis as Annie—or a Black or gay or female or trans video game character—is a choice to shut off both imagination and empathy. 

The failing is not with the narrative, it’s with you.

THIS.

If there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for a character to be white, there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for them to be a different race.

If there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for a character to be straight and cis, there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for them to be queer.

If there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for a character to be able-bodied, there doesn’t need to be a “reason” for them to have a disability.

There doesn’t need to be a “reason” for a character to be different from you, because you are not some sort of Default Human Being against which all other human beings are compared. Black, gay, disabled, and other marginalized people don’t exist for “reasons” – we just exist, same as anyone else. There’s no reason to demand a “reason”.

It isn’t possible for diversity to go too far. There are hundreds or thousands of years to make up for. It won’t be possible for a long time.

  1. mattithecatti reblogged this from lookatthewords
  2. themakicheese reblogged this from lookatthewords
  3. silvergryphonart reblogged this from lookatthewords
  4. blackwolfmajik reblogged this from emeraldspiral
  5. two-trucks-having-s3x reblogged this from emeraldspiral
  6. emeraldspiral reblogged this from patchworkpoltergeist
  7. sapphicsoldierwriting reblogged this from blue-author
  8. halfhumanhalfasleep reblogged this from fufesworld
  9. fufesworld reblogged this from labelleizzy
  10. annechen-melo reblogged this from labelleizzy
  11. chibisketches reblogged this from labelleizzy
  12. labelleizzy reblogged this from revginapond
  13. devotedlyvaliantinternet reblogged this from lookatthewords
  14. blue-author posted this
Previous post Next post