August 8, 2014

skunkbear:

So photographer David Slater wants Wikipedia to remove a monkey selfie that was taken with his camera. As you can see from this screen shot, Wikipedia says no: the monkey pressed the shutter so it owns the copyright.

We got NPR’s in-house legal counsel, Ashley Messenger, to weigh in. She said:

Traditional interpretation of copyright law is that the person who captured the image owns the copyright. That would be the monkey. The photographer’s best argument is that the monkey took the photo at his direction and therefore it’s work for hire. But that’s not a great argument because it’s not clear the monkey had the intent to work at the direction of the photographer nor is it clear there was “consideration” (value) exchanged for the work. So… It’s definitely an interesting question! Or the photographer could argue that leaving the camera to see what would happen is his work an therefore the monkey’s capture of the image was really the photographer’s art, but that would be a novel approach, to my knowledge.

(via npr)

  1. logicked reblogged this from logicked
  2. conniecorleone reblogged this from the-bitchet
  3. fyeahwildanimals reblogged this from skunkbear
  4. marxellkape reblogged this from s-c-i-guy
  5. thecapedturtle reblogged this from tradition
  6. tradition reblogged this from skunkbear
  7. livingvaguely reblogged this from temporaryorbit
  8. temporaryorbit reblogged this from s-c-i-guy and added:
    “Monkey Selfies.” aka “Primate Portraits”
  9. pyrophobic-dragon reblogged this from turtletotem
  10. middremix reblogged this from middleburyremix15
  11. middleburyremix15 reblogged this from skunkbear and added:
    #Middleburyremix15
  12. randomesticating reblogged this from lookatthisstory
  13. skunkbear posted this