Scalia’s cafeteria constitutionalism, in which he picks and chooses the laws he ideologically agrees with and ignores the ones he doesn’t, was never on better display than in Monday’s SCOTUS decisions. In the world according to Scalia, Arizona has the rights to patrol its own borders associated with a sovereign state, but Montana must bow to federal power when it comes to obeying Citizens United (the state’s 100-year-old campaign finance law was enacted free its citizens from the corrupt control of mining interests). Or as Harold Meyerson put it in the Washington Post, “You’re sovereign when Scalia agrees with you; you’re nothing when he doesn’t.”

78 notes

Show

  1. gwydionmisha reblogged this from browngurlwfro
  2. rexcerebri-blog reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  3. silas216 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  4. hairtrending-blog reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  5. mattmeetstheinternet-blog reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  6. cardigarden reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  7. wozziebear reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  8. steenuh reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  9. matilda3663-blog reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  10. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  11. ofthatcolossalwreck reblogged this from diegueno
  12. feminarum reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  13. bitterseafigtree reblogged this from 14kgoldupgraded
  14. kaiamar reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  15. diegueno posted this

Blog comments powered by Disqus