See more posts like this on Tumblr
#reading #norman davies #europe: a historyMore you might like
One might as well ask why the Protestant God was so successful in endowing his followers with coalfields.
The liturgical text forms the portal through which music enters into the cultural history of the Western Christian world.
Perpetual peace is a dream, and not even a beautiful dream. War is part of God’s order. Without war, the world would stagnate and lose itself in materialism. In it, Man’s most noble virtues are displayed – courage and self-denial, devotion to duty, willingness to sacrifice oneself, and to risk life itself.
Rivers to the geographer are the bearers of sediment and trade. To the historian they are the bearers of culture, ideas, and sometimes conflict. They are like life itself. For 2,888 kilometres from Donaueschingen to the Delta. the flow never stops.
When the House of Windsor was created by deed poll in 1917, the republican H. G. Wells had called them ‘alien and uninspiring’. But their cousin, the German Kaiser, was less critical. In a rare flash of wit, he said that he was off to the theatre to see a performance of The Merry Wives of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Eliot’s 433-line poem, largely written in Switzerland. was inspired by the legend of the Holy Grail, and was composed from a string of arcane literary allusions and fragments. The overall effect resembled a ramble through the relics of a shattered civilization.
Started #reading The Isles: A History, by Norman Davies.
They Are Writing About Us In Pravda, by Aleksei Vasilev (1951).
Norman Davies writes of this heartwarming depiction of Moldovan peasant life:
This is hardly great art. But the technique is competent; and the effect is pleasant to the eye. Without indulging any crude political gesture. Vasilev has succeeded in mobilizing all the main elements of Socialist Realism—or ‘revolutionary romanticism’ as Zhdanov called it—as decreed by the Party authorities in 1934. He produces a picture which, to quote Stalin’s phrase, is ‘national in form, and socialist in content.’ The narodnost’ or national spirit of the work is implicit in the link between these Moldavian peasants and their admirers in Moscow. Its partiinost’ or ‘devotion to the party’ is explicit in their delight at the mention of their work in the Party paper. Its klassovost’ or ‘class-consciousness’ is underlined by their peasant clothes and physical labour. Its ideinost’ or ‘ideological character’ is manifest in their optimistic and politically correct attitudes. Its tipichnost’ or ‘representative message’ comes over loud and clear: happy workers plus modern machinery make for high productivity and the welfare of the masses. It is overtly socialist, and it looks quite realistic.
The fact is, all the most important realities of life in the Soviet Union have been systematically falsified. In reality, the Moldavian peasantry had recently been robbed both of its land and its culture. They were forced to live and work in collectives, whose surplus was taken away by the Soviet state. Thousands upon thousands had been driven to their death in the Gulag, or shot as so-called saboteurs. Their language had been arbitrarily transferred to the Cyrillic alphabet, so that Soviet-educated children could no longer read pre-war Romanian or Moldavian literature. They were denied all contact with the western half of their province in Romania, which they were told was a foreign country. They were beaten, beggared, and bullied. And the world was told they were stunningly content.
For the impartial viewer. the question posed is this: how much aesthetic value can art retain when, in human and moral terms, its principal purpose is fraudulent?
Norman Davies, Europe: A History, p.1011.