Interesting fact

Reports of mass deaths at Auschwitz-Birkenau following the documented typhoid epidemic of 1942 prompted Himmler to issue an order on December 28, 1942 to "reduce the death toll in concentration camps at all costs.”

Abraham Lincoln, after signing the Emancipation Proclamation

Thomas Jefferson in a letter to George Washington, January 4, 1786

National Socialism on individualism and democracy (highlights from Richard Tedor’s Hitler’s Revolution).

Conservatives have been fooled into thinking individualism is the most important thing ever, even though it is just another word for liberalism. No nation can exist when everybody is putting his own needs before those of his community. Being unselfish is how you conserve a nation; not being obsessed with individualism.

From Richard Tedor’s Hitler’s Revolution.

Pages 352-358 of Richard Tedor’s Hitler’s Revolution.

From Richard Tedor’s Hitler’s Revolution, page 231.

Women and men are not equal

Because women are not men.

It’s as simple as that.

Screenshot from a fantastic article at Takimag.

The Winter Olympics begin in two days, and Team USA has a problem: with the largest winter team America has ever assembled, at 243 athletes, there are only 10 blacks, a fact the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) laments and wants to ameliorate.

USOC's director of diversity and inclusion, Jason Thompson, said of the overwhelming majority of white athletes, “We're not quite where we want to be” (quoted in The Washington Post). Where they want to be is a place with fewer whites than there already are.

Thompson did not complain that the United States' 2016 Summer Olympics team was 23 percent black, or that the basketball team was 100 percent black (96 percent if you don't count the Mulatto) http://www.trbimg.com/img-578934fa/turbine/ct-lincicome-usa-basketball-spt-0717-20160716-thumbnail. Looking at the Track and Field athletes reveals a majority of blacks there as well (feel free to figure out the percentage, but my point is made just by glancing at them).

To make the basketball and track-and-field teams more diverse would mean replacing some of the blacks with whites. This is frowned upon. Whites are not allowed to replace blacks in anything. But white swimmers do need to be replaced with black swimmers, and white skiers with black skiers. And yes, this would mean we could kiss our potential swimming and skiing medals goodbye, but at least we were inclusive and the 20-year-olds on the Internet could finally stop calling the Winter Olympics racist, at least until the next Winter Olympics.

Millennials need not fear, though, for replacing whites with non-whites is one of the priorities of the USOC. “We've just been trying to find ways to make sure our team looks like America,” Thompson says. It’s as if he believes the racial makeup of the country was an organic development and not a result of the conscious efforts of the national and international governments and media, all brainwashing white people into suicidal passiveness under threat of being called racist if they fight back.

So which of the white Olympians is going to have his or her spot taken away for an under-qualified black guy? Which black person who didn't qualify based on his skills has to be humiliated by being pushed into a group whose skills outshine his?

In the WaPo article linked at the beginning, they use the term “African-American” do describe blacks. The Polish teams don't feature French-Polish, because a French-Pole is not a Pole. The Portuguese teams don't feature “German-Portuguese,” because a German-Portuguese is not a Portuguese. So why, in the context of the Olympics, in which nations compete, are two nations being included as one? Are they African or are they American?

They are Africans who happen to live in America. And yes, I understand Africa is not a nation, but all of the nations of Africa are more related culturally to each other than to any place in the European settlement known as America.

You’re being replaced, white people, and American institutions are celebrating.

#NeverTrump and Evan McMullin

Supporters of Evan McMullin know it is mathematically impossible--mathematically impossible!--for him to win the election. They KNOW that supporting him will siphon votes from Trump, NOT from Hillary, whom they claim to oppose.

So why does #NeverTrump support McMullin, which will result in a Hillary win, rather than voting for Hillary directly? Because to #NeverTrump, symbolism is more important than outcome. That's one of the greatest problems of conservatism.

#NeverTrump has a principle: Constitutionalism or utter destruction of America. So #NeverTrump supports McMullin because they get to say that they stood for Constitutionalism even as they caused the nation's death.

#NeverTrump people supporting McMullin are just being self-righteous. Their love of the country is symbolic, not actual. Proof of this is their "vote your conscience" BS. #NeverTrump's conscience will feel just fine after surrendering country to Third World progressives. "America belongs to Third World progressives now who HATE the Constitution, but at least *I* supported the Constitution by being #NeverTrump."

In an effort to "save Constitutionalism," #NeverTrump is fine surrendering the USA to people who hate the Constitution. Because "principles." #NeverTrump's principle is literally "We support the surrender of America in defense of the Constitution."

They are treasonous bastards. But at least they will feel good about themselves while America becomes an Islamo-Mexican hellhole. They were principled!

Open Borders for Israel

Pass it on.

Blind conservative constitutionalists will kill us all

Blind conservative constitutionalists care more about the Constitution than the existence of the country the Constitution was supposed to protect.

Conservatives know the reality that Islam is bad for America. But they don't want to ban it because they know we have freedom of religion. So what do conservatives do? They pretend Islam is NOT a religion, and that it therefore doesn't fall under the First Amendment's protection. Now they CAN say Islam should be banned (because it's "not a religion"), and they get to keep worshiping the Constitution.

In reality, Islam IS a religion and IS protected under the First Amendment. This means the First Amendment is wrong, no longer good enough, and needs changing. Conservatives hears this, though, and freak out that someone is against the Constitution, without acknowledging the Constitution is endangering us now.

Yes, I AM against the Constitution, or at least parts of it, because it needs fixing and updating to fit the current culture, as Thomas Jefferson said it should be.

"Freedom of religion" is too vague and stupid a phrase to mean anything in a country where Islam (a religion) kills people.