Avatar

Dressed To Kill News & Views

@dtk-newsandviews / dtk-newsandviews.tumblr.com

A companion blog to dtk-womenwarriors
Avatar
Avatar

:D I just found your blog, but I love it! This is one of my creations for a gal that’s dressed to kill.

From PfenixArtwork.deviantart.com (and here on tumblr @pfenixartwork)

Sorry to take so long to get back - I’ve been offline, and now frantaically busy catching up. Your art will show up on dtk-womanwarriors fairly soon :)

Avatar

Blank Picture Frames?

Can anyone tell me why I keep seeing blue picture frames containing either nothing at all, or lots of very small dots? There is a small log above the top right hand corner of the frames ... a letter S surrounded by a starburst.

Avatar
reblogged

Can anyone tell me who painted this?

I know I have this tucked away somewhere in my files, but for the life of me I can’t remeber who painted it. This version is much better quality than the one I have, so I’d like to update it

According to Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor, it’s by artist Wayne Reynolds for WotC. The link on their page is broken, however, so I can’t tell you much more than that.

Thanks muchly. I’ll update my current version of this tomorrow :)

Avatar

Can anyone tell me who painted this?

I know I have this tucked away somewhere in my files, but for the life of me I can’t remeber who painted it. This version is much better quality than the one I have, so I’d like to update it

Avatar

Would you believe these are both by the same artist?

One picture shows well drawn, practical and realistic armor - without even a boobplate, let alone more sexualised and revealing pseudo-armor. The woman is a little slender (either that or she isn't wearing the required layer underneath the metalwork) but not to the point of being ridiculous.

The second pic .... sigh. Unbelievably huge breasts, tiny waist and overly large hips and thighs are only the beginning of the stupidity. Bare skin galore - what is the point of a single massive shoulder protection when much softer and more vulnerable areas are left totally unprotected. And what the hell is even holding that metal bikini top on - super glue?

A skilfully painted, believable character that could inspire writers, gamers and artists alike versus a blow up sex doll wearing fetish metal gear that would be completely laughable if it wasn't so demeaning and degrading.

Avatar

WOULD YOU BELIEVE THESE ARE BY THE SAME ARTIST?

Both images are by Le Long

The first shows a woman in sensible, pratical realistic armor with no unecessary decoration, yet is stil very female and utterly beautiful. The image has a powerful sense of dignity and emotion.

The second image is completely different. The anatomy is extremely stylised and over sexualised. Her "armor" is ridiculously tight, with no visible added layers except for her feet and knees. Her pose is clumsy, almost laughable and projects a sense of childishness and "helpless damsel in need of rescuing". And of course there is the completely unecessary boobge, which totally negates any protection the silly outfit offers.

Check out my sister tumblr celebrating females in non sexist armor Dressed to Kill

Avatar

Double standard ... What double standard?

After all, all her bits are actually hidden!And of course cloth protects as much as metal

And of course she has to assume the "please rescue me" pose, because that's the way all women have to stand when wearing high heels ... oh why did I give her such high heels? Well she's a woman! Of course it isn't just to give her sexy long legs.

And why the light weight fabric, unsupported bust coverage? For the amazing extra protection provided by the astonishing jiggle effect while running on those heels. Of course it isn't just because we like to look at tits!

Yeah right.

Check out my sister tumblr celebrating non sexist armor Dressed to Kill

Avatar
reblogged

Yet another example of beautiful art work destoyed by extremely silly armor.

OK, the bare boobs and belly are bad enough (like a neon sign saying stab me here to kill me quick!) but she hasn't got anythin under the bare metal. The chafing alone must give her several negative dexterity points. And it's snowing - brrrrrrrr. Please don't even think about those poor cold nipples .... hay I said don't even think about them.

Don't forget to check out my collection of women warriors in armor desigend for protection, not seduction: http://dtk-womenwarriors.tumblr.com/

Avatar

So. I was doing a Google search of my full name (because I like to be egotistical when I’ve had a rotten day) and this came up. I’m reblogging because it shows most of the female/warrior charatcers I’ve drawn to this date.

Yep I did blog this in my other identity - and I did so because these are excellent images. These ladies are dressed to fight, not to medel metal lingerie!

Avatar

Here comes the long promised Giveaway! But now it is for Tumblr because of the new policies of Facebook…

So again, the rules

- Anyone can participate because I’ll ship worldwide.

- You have to follow me

-You have to reblog this picture (Max. 10 entries per user!)

- Giveaway ends on Dec 14th, at 23:59 GTM+1, so you can receive it for the Holidays!

I'm not just reblogging this in the hope of a giveaway - this is a blog you all need to see. dtk-womanwarriors fights one sort of gender stereotype - the female warrior as sex doll and/or silly little girl who needs rescuing. Harteus battles more gender stereotypes by painting men who can be beautiful, graceful, slender, and unafraid to show some femininty but still utterly sexy, very male and sometimes very scary.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
harteus
|| the golden forest

I am reblogging this firstly to show that even though I'm ardently against bare skin on fighting females Ive got nothing against bare skin in any other situation; and secondly because it is so damn beautiful.

.

Don’t forget to check out the sister blog to this one

Dressed To Kill – Fantasy Art, Believable Armor : Women warriors dressed for protection, not seduction

Source: harteus
Avatar

this picture is making me really angry

can someone more eloquent than I am please comment with a list of badass female warriors/soldiers in history because i know there have been quite a lot

Tomoe Gozen. 12th Century Japan. Concubine of Minamoto no Yoshinaka, and one of his most famous warriors, called a Demon in Battle and renowned as a swordswoman and archer. Was ordered to flee the final destruction of the Minamoto Clan at the end of the Genpei War by her Lord. While leaving the battlefield, encountered a group of enemy soldiers: rode straight into their formation, pulled their leader out of his saddle, pinned him against her horse, and took his head. She then vanishes from history, never to be heard from again.

Queen Boudicca. Britain, first Century AD. Queen of the Iceni tribe of Celts. After her daughters were raped and she was flogged and humiliated by Roman soldiers, led the Iceni and other tribes of Britain in revolt, leading to the deaths of tens of thousands of Roman soldiers and a near-rout from the British peninsula. Was finally defeated by the Roman general Suetonius, and committed suicide to avoid capture. Is probably the only woman to have her statue in a city she burned to the ground (London).

Princess Zhao Pingyang. 7th Century China. Daughter of Emperor Gaozu. Raised an army on his behalf and led them into battle. Was given full military honors upon her death: one of the only women so honored in Medieval China.

——-

Queen Suryothai, 16th Century Siam (Thailand). Fought in single combat against a Burmese Viceroy, sacrificing herself to save the life of her husband and King.

——-

Aethelflaed of Mercia. 10th Century Britain. Well known for her skills as a tactician and for building many of the castles in Mercia that still stand to this day.

——-

Khawlah bint al-Azwar. 7th Century Arabia, a contemporary of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Once rallied a group of female prisoners into defeating their Byzantine captors using their tent poles. The namesake of the UAE’s first women’s military college.

——-

Finally, let me tell you about what the women were doing while the men were out in some cold, wet field, having their bodies hacked at with swords and axes. They weren’t sitting around a hearth gossiping with their friends. While the men were out fighting, the women were working the fields every day, bringing in the harvests, slaughtering animals, butchering, preserving meat, working their goddamn asses. off. They kept the houses secure. They repaired roofs and spun wool into thread and wove thread into cloth: difficult work today, backbreaking in medieval times. Often times, they did these things while pregnant or raising small children.

They faced disease, starvation, and the constant threat of having some band of raiders come in and rape, pillage, plunder, and slaughter them while their menfolk were off fighting in war. Medieval women, even those who did not fight, were hard, determined, and skilled experts in the arts of survival, farming, weaving, spinning, and motherhood who engaged in backbreaking labor that often killed them at a young age, and they deserve better than to have some adolescent-minded asshole sitting in his warm, comfortable first-world home rant about “feminine privilege.”

So fuck you, original poster. I hope you step on a LEGO.

Did my best to fix it

~Ozzie

You’d think someone who lives so detached from reality would give fantasy artists and writers more credit… 

- wincenworks

This pleases me.

Also, the Celts allowed women to fight, and basically do everything men were allowed to do.

Although, most of their armor was leather, from what I remember.

Also, even if you’re thinking of more typical “knights in shining armor” I’m fairly sure I’ve seen female metal armor sets at Higgins Armory in MA. Unfortunately, I can’t afford to go and check. But yeah.

Celts.

Don’t forget Joan of Arc. I’m pretty sure her armor covered all of her.

Avatar
zooophagous

I feel bad for the OP of this graphic. I mean, how embarrassing must it be to have a graphic 17k notes strong completely dedicated to the fact that he doesn’t know shit about shit and has such a shallow and useless working knowledge of history that he couldn’t even think of a single female in any army ever.

Like wow. That must be rough on you. To have your ignorance broadcast to thousands of people like that in a full color poster, in gorgeous RGB color, completely dedicated to the fact that you are a complete idiot. I’ll pray for him.

Not just Celts. Vikings, Huns and Mongols were known to have a lot of female warriors.

Not to mention, most peasant women who stayed at home while their husbands were on campaign for whichever royal owned his farm? They had to know how to defend the homestead in case of enemy soldiers or bandits or just some roving drunk assholes happening to stop by. And they did that WITHOUT armor. They just picked up whatever farm tools or weapons they had to hand and took care of business.

And speaking of famous warrior ladies, don’t forget Hua Mulan!

This Tang Dynasty Chinese asskicker is even more BAMF in real life than she was in the Disney movie. Depending on which epic poem you read, she also teamed up with a militant princess named Xianniang during the course of her adventures, and managed to keep her bits’n’pieces a secret from her soldiers until the day she took off her armor to return home.

At which point they all went, “Okay, so all those times she told us to grow a pair…she meant…ah ha.”

Somebody mentioned Joan of Arc. Full plate mail there. Led an army of thousands for France and scared the English so much that they wouldn’t concluded peace negotiations with the Dauphin until Joan was handed over for a summary trial and execution. (Because being called by God Himself to lead armies apparently does not excuse the fact that she wore pants and was violently opposed to being raped by her jailers.)

And to cap it off: Mother. Fucking. SHIELDMAIDENS.

Lagertha, wife of Ragnar Lothbrok, was one of the biggest badasses in any Viking saga. According to Saxo Grammaticus,

Ladgerda, a skilled Amazon, who, though a maiden, had the courage of a man, and fought in front among the bravest with her hair loose over her shoulders. All-marveled at her matchless deeds, for her locks flying down her back betrayed that she was a woman.

She saves Ragnar’s ass multiple times during his campaigns at home and abroad, including procuring ships, soldiers, provisions, and lots and lots of dead enemy combatants. One particular story tells of her soldiers panicking and Lagertha sternly directing the disordered retreat around into the enemy camp, turning the rout into an all-out stampede to victory.

And you better believe that SHE had armor.

So yeah. OP does not know SHIT about female warriors.

Just goes to show you, kids. Do your research before you open your mouth, or someone will take that knowledge and ram it down your throat.

also women of samurai families were taught to defend themselves in case enemies came to attack their home while the men were out.

and spartan women were just as rigorously trained (in different things but still) so they could devend their homes

Also, let’s add to this the recent discovery that a great deal of viking warrior corpses presumed to be men were proven to be women and were dressed so similarly and buried with such similar respect that no one apparently noticed in some odd 60 to 100 years of “extensive” research.

I've only reblogged this bit of blatent sexism and rewritten history to allow you to read the excellent rebuffs and refutations written by those above.

.Don’t forget to check out the sister blog to this one

Dressed To Kill – Fantasy Art, Believable Armor : Women warriors dressed for protection, not seduction

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.