Avatar

Love Dog

@mashatupitsyn / mashatupitsyn.tumblr.com

Masha Tupitsyn
Avatar

In 2017, I went offline. No more social media. No more Tumblr (apart from the archive) or Twitter. I've never had Instagram. I now have a website where I have condensed all my work and will post events, news, and upcoming projects. There will also be a "DAILY" post.

My website: IS HERE

I am writing a trilogy of books about cinema, time, the internet, comedy, fame, acting, lying masculinity, and the ethics of presence and attention. It is called: TIME TELLS. The first volume on Time will be published by Hard Wait Press in November 2022.

My most recent book of essays, Picture Cycle, came out with Semiotexte/MIT in 2019

My new film-essay documentary, BULK COLLECTION, was complete in 2022. You can watch the trailer and film HERE I have also made a series of films called The Musicians

Thank you for reading.

Avatar

A friend reminded me of this line from Acker's Blood and Guts today:

"It’s about kids and kids are sweet. I was really in kid time when I wrote that."

Kid time. I think I am in kid time right now.

Avatar
reblogged

Mike missing/feeling L in Stranger Things. The hole shes’s left. The space he’s saved for her even when she’s not there. He keeps the home fires burning. Usually this is “woman’s work.” But in this case, Mike—a boy—does the waiting.

From when I posted about the 1st season of Stranger Things.

Mike the mourner. Not the melancholic.

Avatar

When we live for others, we live forever.

If you want to feel young forever, love.

Avatar

Saw this amazing sight on my way home from dinner tonight. Man dancing to Corelli. I don't know where the music was coming from. He didn't have a radio. It was from somewehere up above.

Avatar

Do people really understand that to have a show where people say, express, and show love is already enough? Is everything? A show where boys do real affective labor, girls have the power to save the world, everyone touches and wants to heal, and people live to fight for each other.

Avatar

Jacqueline Rose’s opening line here, echoes Avital Ronell’s in Kid-Tested about Lyotard being the philosopher that talks to children after a history that has excluded children.

“Children’s fiction” brings up the question I’ve been discussing with my students all semester: the idea of the “children’s movie,” childhood as a selleable commodity, category, fiction. How the 1980s simultaneously created this genre—exploited it, enriched it—and resisted it. Movies for kids were not childish in the 1980s. Children were left to their own devices, unsupervised, often lonely. They were actively looking for something, working things out for themselves, outside of their parents, beyond their immediate family. Children were autonomous interested subjects on “a curiosity voyage”, as Dustin puts it to the town librarian in season 2 of Stranger Things, when she tells him he cannot take out 5 books because he already has 5 checked out. He steals the books. Double curiosity. Curiosity is the way Stranger Things pays its debt (Lyotard: childhood is a debt that can never be paid off) to the 1980s. Not with retro songs, clothes, movie references, mis en scene. But with the Freudian idea of the child. That the child’s curiosity was its destiny. Its greatness. And being interested, as Adam Phillips writes in "The Interested Party", "links us to the past." The monsters in the show only serve to bond people. Ethics are required to survive the world. To live with others. To overcome struggle and suffering—not the other way around (Netflix’s crimes of the father saga, Bloodline). Childhood is both a historical invention and duration, so if we want to understand the crimes of history, children are one way to do it. And, as Brecht said, “As crimes pile up, they become invisible,” echoed later by Derrida’s, “In this century, monstrous crimes (‘unforgiveable’ then) have not only be committed—–which is perhaps itself not so new—–but have become visible, known, recounted, named, archived by a ‘universal conscience’ better informed than ever.” I think this is why people—why I—love Stranger Things. We don’t have anymore crimes left to uncover. We only have things left to protect, salvage, save, and attend to. These kids (along with Joyce and Hopper) attend to each other. Stand guard, hold vigil, talk, listen, protect. They make “promises” (everyone says “Promise?” on the show) and keep their promises. Love is a leitmotif. Everyone is paying careful attention. No one is keeping secrets. No one is trying to get ahead. No one is pretending they can live without each other. No one is lying. Everyone is asking for and accepting help. No one is forgetting. No one is forgotten. Everyone is mourning, indebted. The 1980s here is not some pure time, or duration. It is, in the case of the show, the child’s duration. The human’s duration. The child’s time (remember Mikey’s great utterance to the Goonies in The Goonies, “This is our time”). It is the time and time for the child to enter our thwarted scene. To show us how it’s done. For adults to step aside with their broken duration. With their terrible corrupt stories. The consummate humans, children did things in the 1980s that they are not allowed do today: they forsaked the inhuman world of adults–—who were either absent or corrupt—and, in the process, tried to change the world.

And I love that the cast both knows and celebrates that to be in the show, to act in the show, is a calling and a responsibility.

Image
Avatar

Teaching about boyhood and fantasy and the fantasy of boyhood tomorrow in the Last Action Hero and Life is Beautiful. About the kind of men screen fantasies produce.

Despite the subject mater, Last Action Hero is the more critical, interrogating, and profound of the two films.

It's one of my favorites.

Schwarzenegger, as Jack Slater the fictional action hero within the film:

"What you find so entertaining happens to be my life."

Entertainment hurts. Makes us expendable. The film knows that the sequel is abusive---diegetically and symbolically. The act of sequelizing relies on a kind of exploitation that gets harder and harder to sustain. It requires injury. It requires going numb.

Avatar

Twitter blew up over Adam Sandler touching Claire Foy's knee on the Graham Norton show. He also touches Dustin Hoffman's knee repeatedly on Jimmy Fallon.

In the age of rampant male exploitation and abuse, we're now suspicious of any spontaneous affection, warmth, and touch between men and women. We don't know the difference between affection and cruelty, harassment and tactility, so we police and censor every touch. It reminds me of the way teachers are no longer allowed to be tender with children because of the teachers who abuse their positions. I, for one, would have benefitted from teachers being kind to me at school. Mostly, they were verbally and physically cold and distant, if not downright mean. I remember the teachers that gave me hugs. They changed my life.

Everything is so fucked up.

Avatar

“I like you as much as I can like anyone who thinks I'm an asshole." —Tom to Jane in Broadcast News.

There’s a whole feminist thesis in this admission. And I’m going to teach it in my Love (in film) class next semester. It wasn’t on the syllabus last year. Somehow I forgot to include it.

One of the great things about Broadcast News is the way it portrays a man vying for a woman’s respect. A man who knows he is inferior to the female lead’s talent, intellect, and drive. A man who admits to his inferiority, but wants to be worthy. Jane never hides her superiority and never apologies for it. And this makes her endlessly loveable but “difficult” to love, in the way that all strong women (self-admitted feminists or not) are “difficult” to love (Ahmed’s feminist killjoy). Jane gives herself a few minutes a day to privately cry over this. She bawls her eyes out, then goes back to work, back to her life. It’s brilliant.

We never see this kind of set up. It’s always the other way around: Women desperately trying (or being forced to try) to prove their worth to men, onscreen and off, while men arbiter the worth of everyone else. One of the only other films that shows an exceptional woman’s plight in heterosexual love (though in a completely different, tragic way) is The Way We Were. And that film is devastating.

Is the fundamental difference between the two films a melancholic one? Both men (Tom and Hubble) are white, overrated, and overvalued by everyone. One man, a melancholic, knows it and is paralyzed by the knowledge (Hubble). The other (Tom), who is not a melancholic, is motivated by his shortcomings.

Broadcast News’ alternate ending offers a non-melancholic resolution to a predictable pattern of male dissolution in the face of romantic relationships with strong, ambitious women. Not being able to handle a brilliant, courageous woman you claim to love is the equivalent of not being able to handle the world; not knowing how to live ethically (see The Way We Were). It makes a man—Tom—profoundly mediocre, Tom’s mediocrity itself a subject of the film. But at least the alternate ending exists. Even if it’s not the one viewers ended up with, it’s out there. It was dreamed up. It was acted, which means it has the potential to be real. The alternate ending Tom is not the Tom we see in the theatrical cut. This is not the man he chooses to be at the end. Nor is the man we see in the alternate ending the man women normally get. One ending haunts the other. More precisely, the possible haunts the impossible. Jane, being who she is, has to make the ethical choice: if Tom cannot be the man he should be, Jane cannot be the woman she is. And Jane must be the woman she is.” 

Image
Avatar

I still think this is the most gorgeous song. I'm really mourning the 80s lately. Even the screen kisses. Even the faces ruined by culture.

Avatar

This kiss from Demme's Something Wild is so unbelievably hot. It's perfect. I'm not into blondes, but on occasion there is a certain buttoned-up male blonde I do like. My dream type is the shy, uptight guy, who is secretly full of heat and passion and love. She slips him the tongue, melts him, stains him. Moans the whole way through. He doesn't know her---they've only just met; she's more or less kidnapped him---is in the middle of some work phone call that is stressing him out 80s-style (a decade that gave us the hyperbole of stress), on the side of a highway outside of New York City. But when she kisses him, he immediately succumbs, surrenders. He's hers. The beat of that song is the beat of the destinal. The love set into motion.

Avatar

The Night of the Hunter. Lillian Gish, guardian of children, rifle in hand. Men are the wolves. Teaching this tomorrow.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.