I stumbled upon this page when looking up some research on Ward and I’m surprised to see so much tension over this character in the fandom!! I tend to avoid sites like yours (no offense meant, but if I’m not on the same page as something, I tend to move along) but some particular posts struck me. I completely understand why some fans dislike the character and I’m having a hard time believing that people will actively come after others who do not share their opinion, I do, however, wonder why so many people are against the idea that Grant Ward can be, in some way, redeemed. I’m going to use Black Widow as an example, and while this has most people rolling their eyes, I feel as though they are overlooking many similarities between the characters.
The main point made by people who think you can’t compare the characters is that Natasha is actively working towards redemption, while Ward is still on a path of destruction. I won’t argue the point, but Ward is on his own trajectory. There was a point that Natasha was also not working toward bettering herself and helping the world that she hurt. She slept with Tony Stark to infiltrate STARK industries for her own gain, and ultimately had her loyalty called into question when she fell for Hawkeye. Sounds a bit familiar. She is also one of the world’s most notorious assassins, with Iron Man being one of her targets. Iron Man didn’t viciously hate her for what she did, unlike the team (which I found poor writing, not that they couldn’t be angry and disgusted, but there should have been more emotion mixed in, like there was with Fitz; more believable in my opinion) and many people think he was right to get over it. Ward, on the other hard, is considered a rapist because he slept with May while undercover and wanted to wake up the darkness in Skye, even if he had to force her to confront that part of herself. I’m not excusing the aggressiveness of his threat, of any of his threats, or actions for that matter.
The main difference I see between them is that Ward was more troubled than Natasha, submitting to his violent tendencies before Garrett found him (i.e. burning down his house). While Black Widow was brainwashed into becoming the woman she was, Ward’s tendencies were essentially preyed upon and abused. I wouldn’t say that Garrett brainwashed Ward, but he certainly indoctrinated him, and Ward was in a position to be molded. If S.H.I.E.L.D, had gotten their hands on him first, we may have a different Ward on our hands, but that’s just speculation.
Ward continues to spiral out of control and he does some terrible things, but so did Black Widow. I think if Ward actually took responsibility for his actions - not just with words, but with actions, stopped blaming his circumstances or the actions of others against him, and stopped perpetuating his victim mentality, there is a chance he could be redeemed regardless of what he did. His “ledger,” like Black Widow’s, could be wiped. I’m not necessarily saying he would be redeemed within the group as forgiveness is not deserved and not always possible, but maybe he could be a better man and somehow help S.H.I.E.L.D (potentially).
this is anon just because I don’t have a tumblr. I’ve been thinking of starting one, but it seems like people just fighting in fandoms! You have patience for dealing with things you do.
Blog Master Note: I can understand where you come from to a certain extent, but I really have to disagree with you completely.
First of all, I would recommend you just look through my Natasha Romanoff tag to get a general idea of my thoughts on the subject, because I’m not sure how long this will be. (I’m a bit more sarcastic and sassy in that, though, then I’m going to be in this response, because I am definitely going to try to keep the same polite tone you came to me with in my response).
As to your post itself, one of the reasons why I cannot accept a Ward redemption arc (and why I do accept one for Natasha) is that he has been offered one countless times!!!
The instant Natasha was offered a chance to redeem herself, she took it with both hands and never look back.
Ward was given countless chances.
He was given a chance to come clean when he joined Coulson’s team.
He was given a chance when he had Fitz and Simmons and Fitz made his undying loyalty perfectly clear, and instead he tried to murder the two of them.
He was given a chance when he was in that cell, and instead of coming clean he refused to say a single word until he could use those words to manipulate Skye/Daisy.
He was given a chance when he was being taken for a fair trial, and instead he murdered his guards before going out to kidnap his family and murder them in one of the more torturous ways ever.
Yes, Natasha did a lot of incredibly terrible things. But it still comes down to choices, and while she chose to change the instant that she could and both accepts and regrets the many awful things she has done, Ward spat in the face of every single opportunity for redemption he was handed, and takes delight in his disgusting and villainous actions.
So while I understand while you are trying to make that comparison, I honestly don’t think it’s a valid one.
And because Ward has consistently spat in the face of redemption, it would honestly just be incredibly out of character if the writers tried to make us buy that he’d actually work towards it and start regretting anything that he did.
He even said to his victims faces that he didn’t regret a single thing that he had done to them, and his only regret was revolving around the fact that he didn’t have a team to buddy up with.
And on a less story-analysis note, I do not think that Brett Dalton has the acting prowess to portray a believable redemption arc.
As I’ve said many times before, he has two modes: puppy-eyes and creep. And while he is very good at playing creepy, the performance would need to be a lot more layered if to really show the complexities that a redemption arc would require.
And really, on an even less related note, I’m not sure why he should get a redemption arc in the first place. Everything else aside, sometimes the best villains are the ones who don’t get a redemption arc.
One of my favorite villains ever, actually, never got one. And I was so happy that he didn’t. And it’s not even like he didn’t get the chance or that it wouldn’t have made sense if the writers wanted to put that into the story. They had all of the elements to write him a believable redemption arc.
He had a daughter who he loved with his whole heart and who he would have done anything for, he was working on the same side of the heroes of the show, he wanted to be romantically involved with the heroine, and he had been brought low from his place of power and now understood what it was like to be lorded over by others.
Instead he upped his villainy by murdering one of the important characters on the show just because she was in his way, beat the main character to a bloody pulp, and found new ways of trying to destroy the heroes for good.
And in the very end he literally was tossed into hell.
And it was one of the best villain arcs I have ever seen, if only because the writers did not go the easy route and give the villain a redemption arc, even though everything was perfectly set up for them to do so.
He was a character with many complex layers to him, but he was undeniably and unregretfully a villain.
And while I, at this point, genuinely hate and am bored by and want nothing to do with Ward, I still hope that he will eventually become just as amazing of a villain as this other character was. Because he still actually has that potential, if we ignore Brett’s seeming inability to give a layered performance.
So even ignoring the comparison with other characters who got a redemption arc, I do not want this for Ward because he could be/is so much more interesting as a villain.