Avatar

of raging erections and sizzling threesomes

@badlitmakestheworldgoround / badlitmakestheworldgoround.tumblr.com

no, seriously. don't. » reviews » wishlist » FAQ and askbox » Q&A » twitter » mod Currently reading: July - Texts From Jane Eyre The Raven Boys Ugly Love The Book Thief American Gods (reread) August - Outlander September - The Martian Saga The Colour of Magic October - Embroideries Through the Woods Nimona The Ghost Network The Ocean at the End of the Lane Carry On Illuminae A Monster Calls Leviathan Wakes House of Ivy and Sorrow November - Caliban's War Rebel Belle The Girl on the Train
Avatar

I really hate when a POC tries to talk about the lack of diversity in books, specifically YA, and someone is like “NO! Here’s a list of 10 black protags! And 5 Native! And 2 Latino! So much diversity if you look!”

No. Don’t give me crumbs and expect me to be happy. Don’t give me the same rehashed story of the Black kid overcoming the projects or the Native kid escaping the rez and their alcoholic parents or the Latino kid getting out of the barrio. That’s not what I want and that’s not what we deserve.

I want books with Native kids defeating aliens. I want books with Black kids overthrowing the government. Give me a book where the protag is a Latino asexual girl who has a wild adventure with her two new unlikely friends.

But don’t give me fucking crumbs and expect me to be satisfied. Everyone wants to eat a full meal at the goddamn table, you feel?

Avatar
Avatar
mashable

Marley Dias is frustrated with the lack of diversity in her reading curriculum. That’s why the 11-year-old started a campaign called #1000BlackGirlBooks, which collects and donates books in which black girls are the main characters.

“I was sick of reading about white boys and dogs,” Dias said. “And I told [my mom] I was going to start a book drive, and a specific book drive, where black girls are the main characters in the book and not background characters or minor characters.”

The goal is to collect 1,000 titles by February 11, 2016 when Marley and two fellow student organizers will travel to St. Mary, Jamaica to deliver the books and host a book fair. [via]

If you want to join the campaign, you can send books to:

GrassROOTS Community Foundation 59 Main Street, Suite 323, West Orange, NJ 07052

Source: on.mash.to
Avatar

HELLO AND WELCOME TO YEAR TWO!

Here we are, a whole new year and (mostly) a whole new challenge. The premise is the same, we all want to complete that goodreads challenge, but as we already know, life. Sometimes it’s hard to stay focused or choose something out of all the options taunting us. And here’s where we come in!

Wanna know how the challenge works? Well, get ready for a copy/paste from last year’s post because everything remains the same!

HOW DOES IT WORK?
We’re a book sharing community. Each month a theme is proposed and if you choose to join us, you’ll pick a book that fits it, then post about it either by submitting or using the tag “dragoonthechallenge”.
On the 5th of each month we’ll publish a detailed post about the theme proposed along with ideas of books you can choose and rec lists. On the last day of the month the theme will be DONE, and we’ll then make a post with the round up of all books read along with their tags, so we can all easily check all the information posted about them.
Now, buying books every month is not a thing most people can do, and that’s why the internet is here for! If you need help finding a book download hit us up and we’ll do it, no problem.
HERE’S WHAT YOU CAN SHARE:
Whatever you want! The goal of the blog is to create a safe space for enjoying (or hating) the book you’re reading. Found a quote funny? Post it! Wanna post a picture of you reading the book? Do it! Need to vent your pent up rage? Bless u, please do. If you want to post a review, that’s also very welcome, but no pressure.
IS IT OPEN FOR EVERYONE?
Yes, it is! You can join whenever you want as long as you’re within the month’s deadline. Feel free to interact with other people and comment on their posts. Let’s make this a real community!
ARE THERE RULES?
Yup. Basically, don’t be an asshole, this is not the place. Also don’t post offensive content of any kind. I’m not fussy about spoilers, but other people might be, so include some warning. 

The themes for each month are all HERE, so you can take a look and see if we’re your cup of tea. 

If you’re wondering if we’re on goodreads, wonder no more, we are! Go HERE to check us out.

This year we’re focusing a lot more on reading female writers and protagonists, listen, we might be biased, but we really believe it’ll be cool as fuck. Some themes are a repeat from last year, because well, they’re still cool as fuck. We’re nothing if not predictable. And very queer.

I hope you choose to join us and, if you do, don’t forget to check back with us on the 5th for the first masterpost with recs for January! 

Here’s to another year full of reading!

Avatar

i’ve been getting a lot of messages (that i haven’t answered, i’m sorry about that) from people asking where i’ve wandered off to, so (after a sweet friend talked me into it) i wrote something about it

anyway that’s what’s been going on - why i haven’t been updating the fic, why i haven’t been updating badlit, why i haven’t been around in general. i’m still meandering in and out of internet existence but i’ll try to at least get back to all the people who dropped a line 8) 

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

i saw you recommended pride and prejudice, are you going to see pride and prejudice and zombies when it comes out?

i remember back in the day i tried reading that because a friend of mine was obsessed, but didn’t even make it past page 30... so probably not. i’m not a huge fan of classics remade because i’m an asshole 

even though [opens imdb] [squints] dang. sam riley as darcy... i can see it... i can s-- lena headey as lady catherine and charles dance as mr bennet. you know what. i just might get really drunk and watch this thing after all, even if i have to endure matt smith’s face and a bunch of bloody zombies 

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

okay... alright but CONSIDER... how much would i have to pay you to finish the house of night series, or even just one more book, i've seriously been waiting on this since marked i'd love it

according to wikipedia the house of night series has 9 books (so far) and literally no one has time for that much garbage (despite what this blog might suggest). 

however i’m participating in this awesome challenge hosted by my awesome friend and december’s theme is badlit so (if i find enough eggnog) i will read marked and kill two birds with one stone. or did you want me to skip ahead to book 2? i never actually finished marked 

Avatar

“never use this word because it’s common, instead use all of these things that i’ll call synonyms even though they carry different connotations and will change the meaning of your dialogue if you use them” — very bad and unfortunately very common writing advice

Avatar
underking

“Do you want this sandwich?” she elaborated, acquiring the sandwich from her rucksack with a set of fingers.

His visage was set aflame with a smile. “Sure,” he postulated.

She transferred the nutrition from her hands into his.

“Thank you,” his vocal cords emanated.

“Anytime,” she elevated her shoulders momentarily, then uttered loudly, “she’s right behind me, isn’t she?”

“The lunch lady?” he asked, a smirk engulfing his face in joy.

She moved her head in an up and down motion.

Avatar

so many of you asked that i caved and got my hands on a copy of life and death because clearly i never learn. 

there’s a lot of people already reviewing it/making comparisons, and i sat down with my kindle to add my two cents to the garbage well, but could only handle the foreword. it got me absolutely 100% pissed in less than 10 pages. i know you want me to review the book proper but what you get for now is a piece about the foreword because i have had a beef with this writer since i was 15 and at this point it’s clear that’s not going anywhere. 

in the foreword meyer tries to explain why life and death happened (instead of, you know, something her fans actually wanted to read). apparently she so got so fed up with people calling bella weak or unhealthily obsessed with her terrifying, manipulative, self-centered, cradle-robbing supernatural boyfriend she decided to do the only possible thing: turn her into a man. because two lazily written main characters are better than one. and at the end of the day we’ve all got to pay the bills. 

what’s absolutely amusing to me is how, instead of addressing the infinite amounts of criticism regarding the abusive aspects of her story, she misconstrues basically a decade of critical thinking and turns “you are a poor writer who is giving a terrible example to young girls everywhere” into “you people said the story is weak but what you really mean is that bella is weak because she’s a woman, because you’re all misogynistic"

You know, Bella has always gotten a lot of censure for getting rescued on multiple occasions, and people have complained about her being a typical damsel in distress. My answer to that has always been that Bella is a human in distress, a normal human being surrounded on all sides by people who are basically superheres and supervillains. 

literally all i’m getting from this is that meyer is friends with meryl streep. that’s all my brain’s retaining. 

She’s also been criticized for being too consumed with her love interest, as if that’s somehow just a girl thing. But I’ve always maintained that it would have made no difference if the human were male and the vampire female - it’s still the same story. Gender and species aside, Twilight has always been a story about the magic and obsession and frenzy of first love

[bolded for emphasis]

remember, everyone: first love is about creepy, unhealthy attachment, emotional and physical manipulation, threats, bargaining, and ultimatums - and, ultimately, death. 

the foreword also informs me that almost everyone’s been cisswapped, and considering “bella” and “edward” turned into “beaufort” and “edythe” i’m worried about all the other names. 

meyer also informs me that she had to make some necessary changes because beau is a boy and “more OCD,” as if that’s supposed to mean something to me. he’s also less angry, doesn’t have the chip on the shoulder bella had. i most definitely do not remember bella angry about something or having a chip on her shoulder. granted, it’s been seven years since i touched any of meyer’s stuff and i remember nothing but poor writing and despicable misuse of a thesaurus (both of which she allegedly fixed), but still.

i’ve been on-and-off checking this twitter account all day and i’ve also skimmed a few pages of the actual thing and boy oh boy. beau oh beau. this book’s even worse than the source material. meyer’s still a lazy writer who could have given fans something that they actually wanted, a sort of twilightmore if you will, but instead just search-found-replaced names and added more manly “man code” things (a “man code” is an actual thing beau has. god bless us all). 

i keep moving on with my life and forgetting how utterly idiotic and infuriating that series was - thank god the 10 year anniversary rolled around so i can be reminded of why i hate the things i hate. 

tl;dr - when you stare into the abyss twilight stares back

Avatar

In case you haven't heard, Meyer is releasing a gender-swapped Twilight. I think you should read it and compare it to the original for us.

Avatar

i just woke up from what was supposed to be a power nap but turned into a two-hour stretch where i dreamt i was a fat cat being followed by an evil team rocket-esque duo composed of game grumps’s burgie and donald trump and frankly that was less terrifying than this news

stephenie it’s okay to let it go elsa said it’s okay please let it go 

Avatar

Thats the weirdest erotic sentence i’ve read all month

Avatar
naznomad

this fucking post singlehandedly ruined my life

Avatar
hedwig-dordt

You don’t really appreciate how fucking great fan fic is when it comes to writing sex untill you stop to recognise how Serious Literary Stars fail at writing sex.

DO A BARREL ROLL

Forget what his dick is doing, what are her breasts doing? How do a pair of fat sacks attached to a ribcage barrel-roll anywhere? Let alone across a man’s mouth and then his wanger immediately after? Sir, why is your mouth so dong-adjacent? Is your weiner detachable, is that it? Do you have your joystick clutched in your hand so that you can score a sweet schlong-to-titty-roll immediately after a kiss and then proceed to beat your banana all over her body in the world’s most failed attempt at erotic massage??? HOW DO YOU THINK SEX WORKS???

???????????????????????????

the dick’s like

Image
Avatar
Avatar
dionysiusi
Image

roManCE? aCHileelleS anD PaTrCOlUS ArE GAy?? NOoo AlWayS HeTeRO AnCIEnT GREeks VErY StRAIghT iLIAd HAs No GAy

I’m sorry but didn’t Plato once write an analysis on why Achilles was the bottom in the relationship?

Didn’t the Greek city of Thebes have an elite band entirely comprised of same-sex couples?

Didn’t Spartan men casually sleep together so much that new brides were encouraged to cut their hair in order to ease soldiers into heterosexuality?

Didn’t the Diogenes of Sinope, one of the founder of Cynicism, accuse Alexander the Great of being “ruled by Hephaestion’s thighs”?

Didn’t Aristotle describe Alexander and Hephaestion’s relationship as “two souls in one body”?

NOPE N O T H I N G BUT H  E  T  E   R O  S IN GREECE.

This isn’t even up for debate tho Greece LITTERALY has a patron god of homosexuality

and let’s not forget Priapus (he’s not gay i just really wanted to mention him)

Does it mean nothing to you, the unblemished thighs I worshipped and the showers of kisses you had from me? - Achilles as he mourns the death of Patroclus in Myrmidons, the lost trilogy by Aeschylus (tr. Tom Stoppard)

Pretty hard to read a ‘no homo’ slant into that, really. Just two bros, kissing and admiring each other’s thighs. Y’know. Guy stuff.

Avatar
Avatar
bibliogato

On For Such a Time by Kate Breslin and Writing the Holocaust

You might not be aware but a few weeks ago, a book called For Such a Time by Kate Breslin was up for a RITA from the Romance Writers of America. It’s an Emmy or an Oscar of romance writing. The book was published in 2014 and I had personally never heard of it prior to reading the Smart Bitches review of it. That is what I’ve linked to as I’d rather not link to its Amazon or Goodreads profiles.

In short, the book is a retelling of the Book of Esther (a Jewish story about a strong Jewish woman, who saves her people, and keeps her faith, and is not a romance) in which a Nazi camp commander saves a Jewish woman from Dachau and takes her to Theresienstadt in then-Czechoslovakia. There, they fall in love, and through a magically appearing Bible, find Jesus, and save Jews. At the end, the woman converts to Christianity because that’s her redemption arc.

There are multiple factors at play here. First, the author, Kate Breslin, co-opted the horrific, unimaginable tragedy that happened within living memory to other people to promote her own agenda (evangelical/inspirational Christianity). Second, her agent, her publisher, and multiple RWA judges, not to mention the HUNDREDS of reviews on retail sies and Goodreads, did not think this was problematic. Third, the way we, across religions, have begun to approach the Holocaust is problematic and dangerous.

I could tell you about the microaggressions I experience as a Jewish woman regarding the Holocaust. I can tell you that people told me so often that I was “lucky” to have blonde hair blue eyed (like the heroine of Breslin’s book) because I “would have probably survived the Holocaust.” I began to adopt it as my own line, a way of deflecting the comment before it came. I can tell you that people have told me to “stop playing the Holocaust card.” And I can tell you that while I wish the Jewish national identity did not have to cling so tightly to its tragedies, it is a privilege the rest of you experience that you do not.

Over at Smart Bitches, the review is absolutely on point. Here, Rose Lerner goes through the problematic five star reviews of the book. Here, Smart Bitches’ Sarah Wendell wrote a brave and important open letter.

And I, KK Hendin, India Valentin, Dahlia Adler and others have been on Twitter. I’m adding my long form response here in hopes that Breslin, her publisher, RWA, the judges, and the readers and reviewers consider Jewish voices that they co-opted, stole from, offended, undermined and erased through the publication and award of this book.

In the book, the commander is the head of Theresienstadt. For those who don’t know, Theresienstadt was the ‘model camp’ used to show the Red Cross that things weren’t “so bad”. In reality, 140,000 people were interned there and just over 17,000 people survived it and the deportations to Auschwitz. The commander of that camp made people stand out in freezing temperatures until they literally dropped dead. He killed thousands of children. He oversaw the deportations to Auschwitz where a small percentage survived. He watched tens of thousands of people die of disease and starvation in his ‘model camp’. And Breslin, her publishers, her readers, and RWA judges found that person worthy of redemption. Not only worthy of, but exceptional. Romantic.

If that’s your definition of a romantic hero…I have no words for you. I didn’t realize that genocide turned so many people on, but there you go.

Part of this is the glorification of forgiveness and the idea that every person is redeemable. There was a good conversation I had on Twitter about this and I understand these are religious and fundamental differences between people. I don’t think mass genocide is a forgivable thing. Kate Breslin, her publishers, her readers, and RWA does.

Part of this is evangelical Christianity’s relationship with Jewish people (not with Judaism, let’s be clear) and Israel. Let’s be clear: we are people. We are not anyone’s tickets into heaven. We are not your Chosen people.

Part of this is that anti-Semitism in America wears many masks, and one of them is silence. It is as violent as the others. Silence is not neutrality. Silence allows, if not fosters, oppression, aggression, and erasure. If you are silent on this book, please take a moment to examine why you are silent.

In Kate Breslin’s book, there is an unequal power dynamic. There is no consent. What you are celebrating is rape, and it happened to many women during the Holocaust. He has all the power. She has none of it. Her life is in danger. She cannot consent in this case. That is rape. What happened is rape and rape is not romantic. And it’s certainly not inspirational.

What happened here is that Kate Breslin stole a tragedy that wasn’t hers to promote her own personal agenda. And in doing so, she contributed to the erasure of both victims and survivors of the Holocaust. Her book is anti-Semitic, violent, and dangerous. It glorifies and redeems a Nazi, while removing all of the Jewish woman’s agency and forcing her to convert to Christianity in order for her arc to be considered redemption. It is, in fact, exactly what has been done to the Jewish people throughout history. For longer than Christianity has been a religion, Jews across the world have been forced to convert or to hide their Judaism to save their lives. That is violence. That is erasure. Kate Breslin’s book is violence and erasure.

And as a Jewish woman who writes romance, I feel betrayed. Betrayed by my fellow romance readers. Betrayed by the people who published this. Betrayed by the judges who allowed it to get past the first round much less onto the ballot. Betrayed by the organization whose silence was support. Betrayed by everyone who has remained silent on this, who hasn’t called it out.

It is not easy to be Jewish in America. Many think it is because of stereotypes, but when push comes to shove, especially online, we turn toward our own and huddle close. It’s a collective memory safety measure. We have only ever been safest in communities made entirely of Jews. There are places in America where I am safer to say I am queer than I am Jewish. I talk more about queerness than Jewishness because of the backlash I’ve received for my Judaism. When discussions of diversity and racism come up, we are excluded.

But, as Justina Ireland and I were saying on Twitter yesterday, the Venn Diagram of racists and anti-Semites is a circle.

The discussion last night on Twitter was draining and exhausting. It is hard to shout about this for weeks. I admire Sarah so much for that open letter and my fellow Jewish writers and readers who were speaking up. I’m grateful for our allies who signal boosted.

I asked during the discussion when non-Jewish people learned about the Holocaust as I cannot remember a time when I didn’t know about it.

The responses were illuminating. Most people learned in late elementary school, some as late as high school and into college. Some learned in units during history or social science classes. But most learned because they read books like Devil’s Arithmetic, Night, The Diary of Anne Frank, Number the Stars in English/Language Arts classes. I worry that by teaching nonfiction right next to fiction, we’re subconsciously distancing the Holocaust from real life. From ‘truth’. That it’s being filed away in minds as fiction.

I know that the Holocaust is hard to wrap our heads around. 6 million Jews, and roughly 5-6 million other victims, including Roma, disabled people, gay people, political prisoners, and Jehovah’s Witnesses. That’s more people than any of us have ever seen standing in one place. That’s more people than live in New York City. That’s an incomprehensible number of lives and stories that went up in smoke. And there are more victims than we will ever know: there are mass graves and bodies all over the forests of Belarus, Ukraine, Poland, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, France. Not everyone made it to camps. I know this is hard to comprehend and I know that books and movies are increasingly our only access point for information about the Holocaust as survivors pass away.

But it’s alarming to me the number of people who learned late in life. Or who considered late elementary school to be early. For Jews, the Holocaust is something we carry with us everywhere. It is always with us. It informs our identity, our way of moving through the world, our holidays, our grandparents’ experiences, how we interact with food and triggers. My father won’t buy German cars. I won’t drink Fanta. There are ways the Holocaust lingers because it fundamentally changed Jewish identity, even in the wake of previous genocides and ethnic cleansings.

I am the granddaughter of a camp liberator. I am the great-granddaughter of pogrom survivors. I have stood on the edge of Babi Yar and wondered if the dirt beneath my feet was made from the bones of my relatives who died there.

The Holocaust is more than a single story. It is more than a book read in a classroom or Schnidler’s List. It is millions and millions and millions of stories extinguished. That we will never know. That’s what the Holocaust is. Not was, but is. History is present tense for some things.

Writing about the Holocaust is not something to do lightly.

As a white American, I wouldn’t touch a romance involving an African-American slave because there is no way—none—that I could handle that properly. Because you can research so many things, but you can’t research collective memory and the way that affects you personally. You can’t. I can’t access that certain empathy, that certain feeling, that way of being and feeling in a world that isn’t your own that I would need to in order to tell that story.

Just because you have the idea of a story doesn’t mean that you should, or have the right to, write it.

And if you decide to write about the Holocaust, and you are not Jewish, I recommend going to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Go slowly. Listen. Watch. Read. And when you get to the shoes, stand there until you realize that’s a fraction, maybe a 1/1000th, of the volume, from one camp. Just one camp.

When you write about another group’s tragedy, your goal should be First, do no harm. Kate Breslin, Bethany House publishers, her agent, the readers, the judges, and in allowing this to be nominated, Romance Writers of America, failed that critical first step.

Please, for the generations that come next who will have no survivors to speak to them, no survivors who saw evil walking around in leather boots and not in the pages of their books as romantic hero, do not do what Breslin and her people did. Do no harm.

Avatar
Avatar
sarahwendell

Letter to the RWA Board regarding For Such a Time by Kate Breslin

For Such a Time by Kate Breslin is an inspirational historical romance between a Nazi concentration camp commander and a Jewish prisoner. It was nominated by the Romance Writers of America for Best First Book and Best Inspirational Romance in 2014. It won neither category, but the book’s presence as a nominee has upset a growing number of people. 

At Smart Bitches, Trashy Books, we undertake a community review project to try to give every RITA_nominated book a review before the awards are announced. The review for this book was written by a guest reviewer named Rachel, and it is extraordinarily good in my opinion.

Rose Lerner and her BFF have compiled a collection of the 5-star reviews for this book, as well.

After the RITA awards, which were held on July 25, 2014, I wrote a letter to the Board of Directors of Romance Writers of America to explain (or try to explain) why this book’s nominations were so offensive and upsetting. I sent this letter via email and received a response from the president of RWA. But in the conversations I’ve had online over the last few weeks, I’ve suggested people let the board know about their feelings as well. 

So if it helps anyone who wants to clarify why this book’s nomination (and its publication at all) are so upsetting and offensive, here is the text of my letter: 

July 27, 2015 Dear RWA Board of Directors:

This is one of the most difficult letters I’ve had to write, because each time I try to explain why I’m upset, and why I’m writing, I become more angry. But I’m deeply disturbed and distressed that For Such a Time by Kate Breslin was nominated for a RITA as Best First Book and Best Inspirational Romance.

If you’re not familiar with this book, the heroine, described by the publisher’s cover copy as a “blonde and blue-eyed Jewess,” is a prisoner in Theresienstadt, a Nazi concentration camp where over over 140,000 Jews were held. A quarter of the inmates there died of starvation and disease, and more than 90,000 were deported to Auschwitz and other extermination camps, where they were killed. By the end of World War II, a little over 17,000 people had survived Theresienstadt.

The hero of For Such a Time is an SS commandant who saves the heroine from being killed at Dachau, believing that she is not Jewish despite being raised in a Jewish family. He brings her to Theresienstadt to work as his personal secretary. So this is a romance between a Jewish prisoner and a Nazi officer who was in charge of a concentration camp.

To put it mildly, I don’t see this setup as an imbalance of power that could possibly be redeemed in a romance narrative, nor do I think the setting and characterization is remotely romantic. But I think this issue is much larger than my individual opinion.

The book is a retelling of the book of Esther set during the Holocaust, an ambitious undertaking to be sure. But in addition to the attempt at redeeming a hero who is a Nazi commander, at the end of the book, the heroine converts to Christianity, a narrative decision that also insensitive and offensive. Christianity is what redeems the heroine and the hero, and again, I’m at a loss for words to fully explain how and why this is so objectionable. But I will try.

In the Holocaust, over 6 million Jews, and more than 17 million people in total were killed by the Nazis. In For Such a Time, the hero is redeemed and forgiven for his role in a genocide. The stereotypes, the language, and the attempt at redeeming an SS officer as a hero belittle and demean the atrocities of the Holocaust. The heroine’s conversion at the end underscores the idea that the correct path is Christianity, erases her Jewish identity, and echoes the forced conversions of many Jews before, during, and after the Holocaust.

I am addressing each step in the process of this book by writing to the author, the editor, the head of the publishing house, and of course you, the board of the RWA. I know many of you personally and have a great deal of respect for the responsibilities you carry. I know that you don’t each personally oversee the RITA nominations, nor do you personally judge each book.

But the fact that this book was nominated in two categories is deeply hurtful, and I believe creates an environment where writers of faiths other than Christianity, not just Jewish writers, feel unwelcome. It certainly had that effect on me, because I don’t understand exactly how so many judges agreed that a book so offensive and insensitive was worthy of the RWA’s highest honor. But clearly enough did so, and the result for me as an RWA member is a feeling of distrust and pain, and concern that my reaction and feelings may not be heard.

I know that books like For Such a Time by Kate Breslin do not happen in a vacuum. More than one person had to agree that this story was worth writing, worth editing, worth publishing, and then worth nominating for the RITA as Best First Book and Best Inspirational Romance. I question the judgment of those who evaluated this book in the first round, and am, to be honest, very thankful that it did not win.

I have watched RWA enact some terrific programs and amend rules to reflect how the genre has changed for the better. I think this year’s conference was one of the best, especially given the difficult and complicated topics addressed in various sessions. I know each of you wants to advance the reputation and the professional community of romance and the women who write it. The nomination of this book does neither of those things. 

I hope that in the future, there is a way to ensure that a book so deeply offensive and insensitive is not among those honored as the best in romance.

Sincerely,

Sarah Wendell RWA Member

Avatar
nkjemisin

This is revolting.  And this is how bigotry perpetuates itself.

Not surprised by the obliviousness (or malice; I never assume something so cruel and hurtful is benign) that led Breslin to write this anti-Semitic hot mess.  But no one along the chain of people who wanted to give the book an award thought to put up a hand and say, “What the actual fuck, people?”

Avatar
teaberryblue

I’ve been reading about this over the past couple of days and while I know NOTHING about romance publishing, and knew nothing about this before this letter surfaced, this whole thing is making my physically ill.

I am an ethnic Jew.  I’m a lot of things, ethnically– I’m Italian and Dutch and North African, but a very large part of my heritage is Ashkenazi. 

I was not raised Jewish. In fact, I didn’t know I was Jewish until after my father’s stepmother died when I was in my late teens.   I was lucky enough to grow up with a lot of very close Jewish friends who were very generous in sharing their culture and religion growing up, in a community with a strong Jewish culture, that studied the Holocaust in school and gave me the opportunity to win a grant for further Holocaust study.  I was not raised Jewish because my grandfather’s only way out of Germany was to convert.  In 1938, my grandfather was adopted by his mother’s Catholic husband, converted to Catholicism, and used his new identity to escape Nazi Germany and emigrate to the US, where his mother and stepfather lived.  We have pieced what little we know about this story together from legal documents and a very, very little bit of extant correspondence.

He married a woman who was also ethnically Ashkenazi, whose family had been posing as French-German in order to evade the deeply anti-Semitic laws of 1930s Long Island. 

Half of my entire cultural, ethnic, and potentially religious identity were wiped out because my ancestors were forced to erase their own faith and culture in order to survive. 

I’m not going to entertain any arguments about how since this was my father’s family, I wouldn’t be Jewish, anyway, because my grandparents’ entire lives, and my father’s life, might have been completely different. Fuck, I probably wouldn’t even exist.

I don’t even want to talk about the creepy Stockholm Syndrome-esque romance.  That, to me, is actually a more layered conversation that I don’t feel qualified to talk about without having read the book.  

But I do want to talk about how awful it is to see a tired trope that has been played out since the Renaissance– that the happy ending, for Jews, is to erase their faith.  That Jews who have been actively harmed for so long because of their identity would find emotional freedom or salvation in choosing to rid themselves of that identity.  My ancestors were forced to erase their identity in order to gain literal freedom and salvation, and there will always be a part of me that feels like part of who I am, and my personal history, was stolen from me. 

There are all kinds of positive reasons to convert to a different faith– community, family, deep spiritual connection– and the active choice to convert is a wonderful one, but it’s also one that takes a great deal of deliberation for the people who make it, especially when you are part of a people whose entire culture and identity is tied to your faith, inextricably so.  There’s no way to describe being a person who will never be able to know that part of her own identity because your ancestors were forced to make that choice for their own safety during one of the most vile and inhuman periods of our history. 

My grandparents were lucky.  They both survived, relatively unscathed.  But I won’t ever know whether my grandfather had family in Germany, or what happened to them, what happened to his friends, his home, who he had been before the Holocaust.  And that is true for so many Jews.  A very great number of American Jews today are the descendants of the lucky ones, the ones who made it out, and so many of their families faced greater atrocities than mine.  And we have all had something, some part of who we are, erased. 

This is not a happy ending and it never will be. 

Avatar

this is driving me up the wall, i’ve been trying to remember the tile of this book i read when i was younger for hours now and i have NOTHING. it’s a cowboy harlequin book. protagonist works on the family ranch with her childhood friend and she’s a tomboy (despite apparently looking like amanda seyfried) and thinks she’ll never find love because of her missing femininity. then her artsy liberal neighbour (possibly a painter named sarah?) has to go out of town for a while so she asks protagonist to look after her plants or what have you. one day there’s a storm and protagonist’s horse… freaks out… i think… and she ends up in a cave with her friend? but it’s dark so he doesn’t know it’s her and she lies and says she’s the artist woman and they make out because that’s what you DO with strangers in a cave. after this he decides they have to see each other again so she invites him over to her (sarah’s) place but they make some fifty shades bullshit pact where he has to be blindfolded all the time as she unleashes her inner goddess???? and he falls in love with “sarah” because she gives a really mean blowjow but she’s actually his childhood friend???? and protagonist is so sad about this because she realises she’s in love with her childhood friend and he loves a woman that doesn’t even exist but then he finds out she was impersonating sarah and proposes to her????? 

HELP 

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.