Avatar

Nocbot

@nocbot-blog / nocbot-blog.tumblr.com

Linear Scrap Repository [Arts/Text/etc]
Avatar
Given the sudden interest for the color of dresses and vision, here some of the fascinating findings we did recently.
The color nuances we see depend on the number and distribution of cones (=color receptors) in our eye. You can check this rainbow: how many color nuances do you count?
You see less than 20 color nuances: you are a dichromats, like dogs, which means you have 2 types of cones only. You are likely to wear black, beige, and blue. 25% of the population is dichromat.
You see between 20 and 32 color nuances: you are a trichromat, you have 3 types of cones (in the purple/blue, green and red area). You enjoy different colors as you can appreciate them. 50% of the population is trichromat.
You see between 33 and 39 colors: you are a tetrachromat, like bees, and have 4 types of cones (in the purple/blue, green, red plus yellow area). You are irritated by yellow, so this color will be nowhere to be found in your wardrobe. 25% of the population is tetrachromat.
You see more than 39 color nuances: come on, you are making up things! there are only 39 different colors in the test and probably only 35 are properly translated by your computer screen anyway :)
It is highly probable that people who have an additional 4th cone do not get tricked by blue/black or white/gold dresses, no matter the background light ;)
(x)
Avatar
nocbot-blog

Alas, this apparently is all of the bull.

In short: tetrachromacy (while a thing!) is actually pretty subtle and a bit rarer - and isn't going to show up in an RGB image from a computer monitor like this one is.

And they don't see "like bees" because they see in the ultraviolet range and humans don't.

And humans with color-blindness mostly (?) aren't "dichromats," they're "anomalous trichromats" with three types of cone, but where one or more of them is just miscalibrated to be more sensitive to a range that overlaps with one of the others. And that's also much less than 25% of the population.

And also, this whole thing was written up by a marketing professional, who appears to have astutely picked up on the fact that if you present a neatly written "test" that tells all of the viewers that they're special in some way, they'll excitedly share it around. 

So. 

Avatar

A dumb little ship, for messing around with in Unity. Currently, it spins around in a (physics-driven!) spiral as if being flushed. By the end of the week, I hope you'll actually be able to tell it to go places.

Avatar

There comes a time, when you take a really good look in the mirror, and think:

"I need to start flossing."

Avatar
reblogged

Ever have one of those days where you’re not stressed about anything in particular, but it just feels like something’s been *chasing* you since you woke up?

I swear I can practically feel its breath on my neck. Metaphorically.

eronarn

Are you working from Franchia today

Yeah, how’d you know? And I recently found this manuscript about a movie about a hallway…

No but seriously this is unpleasant

Avatar
nocbot-blog

Hello! We care about your feedback on MeatPuppet, and your customer experience is important to us.

It looks like your "Fight or Flight" feature has become stuck on "Flight Mode." This is a known issue that our developers are working on resolving. In the meantime, as a workaround, we suggest performing the following steps:

  1. Stop what you are doing.
  2. Slowly and deliberately turn around.
  3. Take a deep breath.
  4. Emit a bloodcurdling scream at maximum volume.
  5. Visualize your spectral pursuer recoiling in horror and fleeing from your presence, never to return.
  6. Politely inform passerby, coworkers, or fellow theater-goers that you are simply resolving with a firmware issue in the manner advised by customer support, and that there's nothing to be concerned about.
  7. Return to what you are doing.

This should resolve your issue! As always, we apologize for the inconvenience.

- MeatPuppet Customer Support

Avatar
reblogged

"It’s not like we can effect the level of the lake."

"If this was a Zelda game we could."

"WE CANNOT EFFECT THE LEVEL OF THE LAKE."

Okay but y’all how is there not a zelda tabletop setting yet?

Avatar
nocbot-blog

"Fight monsters while solving little physical block puzzles" is actually an astonishingly good idea.

Avatar

It is a very nice tablet, that came in a very large box.

Avatar
reblogged

I'll be honest, the thing that strikes me the most about that is that story is that your takeaway is "wow, I put WAY too much work into that vendetta, how did I have the energy?" and not "In retrospect, going all House of Cards on my friend-group was weird and actively malevolent, and I'm sure glad I've learned to relate to people since."

Avatar

Yeah, I mean, that too. But talking about all the “I am actually a bad person” revelations I had relating to that episode is less fun.

Years later I would run into him and he’d give me that fawning abused puppy behavior. “I’m smiling and being friendly. What can I do for you? Please don’t hurt me”.

Seeing that doesn’t make you feel great about your choices. This is among the reasons I tend to remind people that that version of me was not a good person.

Avatar

[snipception]

Okay, so I feel like I need to stress some things. In reference to point 1 there…yeah, I did make the point in a footnote that some part of my reaction was in fact a reaction to being emotionally manipulated. But you’re absolutely right that at some point it became “by being shitty to my friends and (for a much longer period), to me, you have made yourself a valid target”. Like I kindof implied in my first answer, it was not a shining moment for me.

And like Sol, I have an immediate “why bother” reaction to questions like “are you trustworthy” and “are you safe”, because I feel like there’s no trustworthy answer to them. If I say yes, I could just be lying, and if you don’t feel safe you already have a better answer than I could give you. 

But you’re sitting here telling me that you actually trust my answer to this question, so maybe your mind works differently than mine (go figure). So here’s the best answer I can give you: There’s a reason I had to reach back 16 years for that story. All the impulses that led to that episode are still very much part of me. But I express them very differently now, and I feel like that matters a lot more. Short answer, yes, I am trustworthy and yes you are safe . But also, if me being in your immediate environment makes you feel unsafe anyway, I can also…stop doing that. It is, after all, your house. Just let me know.

Anyway, this has all been a massively unpleasant outgrowth of a “man, wanna hear a fucked up story about teenage-me?” anecdote, and I feel like I’ve been put on trial, so can we be done now one way or the other?

Avatar
nocbot-blog

We can! I accept your reassurance, if you can accept my apology for dragging this out through multiple steps of cross-examination over an offense that's now old enough to drive, we can return to being cool!

(I'd understand if you remained bothered, and am willing to buy you apology booze as weregild. Either way, you may continue being in my house!)

(Also "being cool" is totally an improvement over "being anxiously wary," so I do think some form of this exchange needed to happen at some point? But I do wish I'd been able to accomplish that in a way that was less painful for you, because holy crap is "needling people about bad memories until they convince me that they're harmless" not a thing I feel happy about doing.)

Anyways, the cut is some word-vomit about why what you just said is a good answer that I actually trust! You can feel free to skip it if you just want to be done with the whole thing, but I think it's actually broadly complimentary? So yeah.

WORDS.

Avatar

I'll be honest, the thing that strikes me the most about that is that story is that your takeaway is "wow, I put WAY too much work into that vendetta, how did I have the energy?" and not "In retrospect, going all House of Cards on my friend-group was weird and actively malevolent, and I'm sure glad I've learned to relate to people since."

Avatar

Yeah, I mean, that too. But talking about all the “I am actually a bad person” revelations I had relating to that episode is less fun.

Years later I would run into him and he’d give me that fawning abused puppy behavior. “I’m smiling and being friendly. What can I do for you? Please don’t hurt me”.

Seeing that doesn’t make you feel great about your choices. This is among the reasons I tend to remind people that that version of me was not a good person.

Avatar

the hell kind of question is that

  1. first of all the way that they answer doesn’t really make a damn difference does it now
  2. second of all by asking - repeatedly - you’re already undermined their trustworthiness, like…
  3. third of all they very plainly already answered: no, they are not Littlefingering us

honestly I’m a bit bothered by how readily you seem to dismiss that the person they’re referring to was extendedly emotionally abusive to them, like, they’ve already expressed sincere remorse for their actions but this isn’t like someone swiped their parking place okay. if you’re planning to emotionally abuse them then. what. I’m thinking otherwise you’re good

it’s okay to find this upsetting and unsettling but to try to make someone convince you they’re a good person? uhhhhhhh

Avatar
nocbot-blog

Things!

1) Based on their original post, the context wasn’t “this person was emotionally abusive to me for an extended period of time.” It was “this person was a total dick to my friends this one time they both met.”

2) I’ve known toloveviceforitself for, like…what, seven years now? All of which have involved a pretty cordial relationship! Hell, they spend about as much time in my house as they do in yours.

I am not a random person from Tumblr who suddenly took issue with something they posted and decided to Capital Letters Take Issue with something they said.

Instead, I’m someone who lives…pretty closely adjacent to them, and who’s pretty deep within the radius of their social influence, and who’s been feeling consistently anxious about how safe they actually are around people both specifically and in general.

So when someone’s like “Yeah, so this one time I totally destroyed someone’s life when they slighted me,” it…doesn’t feel entirely unreasonable to ask them to reassure you that you shouldn’t have to worry about that sort of thing!

3) And…yes, actually, the way they answer would make a difference! Because as someone who’s known them for as long as I have, I’ve developed a sense that they’re definitely capable of being vindictively manipulative (and also a sense that they’re vastly more persuasive and charismatic than I am!)…

…but also a sense that they tend to be pretty good about answering questions honestly when they’re plainly asked.

So, yes, I would believe toloveviceforitself if they told me I should feel safe around them. And since they’re someone I’m scared of — and since they’re someone who spends a lot of time in my house and spends a lot more time with my roommates than I do — I don’t feel like a bad person for requesting this reassurance. 

Avatar
reblogged

I'll be honest, the thing that strikes me the most about that is that story is that your takeaway is "wow, I put WAY too much work into that vendetta, how did I have the energy?" and not "In retrospect, going all House of Cards on my friend-group was weird and actively malevolent, and I'm sure glad I've learned to relate to people since."

Avatar

Yeah, I mean, that too. But talking about all the “I am actually a bad person” revelations I had relating to that episode is less fun.

Years later I would run into him and he’d give me that fawning abused puppy behavior. “I’m smiling and being friendly. What can I do for you? Please don’t hurt me”.

Seeing that doesn’t make you feel great about your choices. This is among the reasons I tend to remind people that that version of me was not a good person.

Avatar

[snip[

Look, snow chairs are a tragedy of the commons thing that actively makes everything worse for everyone and if the worst thing that happens to someone for engaging in that fuckery is that they lose a chair that they put out in the street where *curb trash* goes…

Ahem. Anyway. I’m arguing with an example which is probably not productive. If you really want to know how I structure my morality I can go into it, but the short answer is no, I am not littlefingering anyone. (I assume? I think littlefinger is a GOT character and you aren’t asking about sex acts but I’m not 100%)

Avatar
nocbot-blog

He is a GoT character! I was referencing the thing where he goes “Yeah, you shouldn’t trust me,” but then characters trust him anyways because he’s useful and charismatic, and then when he inevitably betrays them he’s like “Come on, I warned you about this.”

…but man, the answer I was looking for wasn’t “Here, let me explain the ins and outs of how I personally understand the morality of my actions.”

I was hoping for something more like, “Yes, you can feel safe around me, because I’m no longer the kind of person who will take pleasure in hurting you the second you’ve done something to designate yourself as fair game.”

Avatar

Wait, hold on.

...was that just a Callout Post?

Did I just compulsively defray it with apologetic posturing and humor that it failed to be recognizable as such, even internally?

Did it end up being the Callout Post equivalent of "I'm kidding unless you're into it?" ("Haha, your behavior SURE HAS BEEN TROUBLING in this silly and humorous way, right?")

Is this failure something I can internalize as a charming character trait, the way I can with my tendency to impulse-buy games about spaceships when I'm under stress? Or is it just something I'm doing embarrassingly wrong? 

(Incidentally, Homeworld: Remastered is pretty cool, even if the sense I got is that HW1 lost a little bit in the transition.)

Avatar
reblogged

I'll be honest, the thing that strikes me the most about that is that story is that your takeaway is "wow, I put WAY too much work into that vendetta, how did I have the energy?" and not "In retrospect, going all House of Cards on my friend-group was weird and actively malevolent, and I'm sure glad I've learned to relate to people since."

Avatar

Yeah, I mean, that too. But talking about all the “I am actually a bad person” revelations I had relating to that episode is less fun.

Years later I would run into him and he’d give me that fawning abused puppy behavior. “I’m smiling and being friendly. What can I do for you? Please don’t hurt me”.

Seeing that doesn’t make you feel great about your choices. This is among the reasons I tend to remind people that that version of me was not a good person.

Avatar
Avatar
nocbot-blog

Yeah. It's just...man, that story clicks really well with, like. Personal advice I've been hearing you give that amounts to "if you can get away with it, why the fuck not?" And the friggen snow chair thing, and such. 

So I guess this is just a polite request to confirm that you're not Littlefingering us, and thinking that "Yeah, uh, my internet handle is a demon and I've given you all these warning signs that I'm not to be trusted, so what's about to happen to you is entirely your own fault."

(I think it's okay to politely request this of people every so often, right? Like how you have to periodically resubscribe to a newsletter or something.)

("Please check [yes] if you're quietly maneuvering to betray us when it's profitable or amusing, we understand if you are but just want to avoid continuing to send you notifications of community events if you're only using us as a pawn in some sick game.")

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
nocbot-blog

Today's thing it feels like there must be a word for:

The state of persistent, low-level panic that vibrates in the back of your mind and feels like a metallic whine at a pitch you can’t hear but nonetheless makes it hard to think or feel anything else.

[snip]

Pretty sure the term is “severe anxiety”. Feel better, friend.

Are you sure? I've always heard anxiety described as more of an involuntarily, looping replay akin to having a song stuck in your head, while this is more "cloud of angry and defensive buzzing."

(I also can't shake the sense that this is just how most people feel all the time, and the fact that I can clearly identify this as an alien mindset is a tremendous luxury? But still.)

Avatar

Today's thing it feels like there must be a word for:

The state of persistent, low-level panic that vibrates in the back of your mind and feels like a metallic whine at a pitch you can't hear but nonetheless makes it hard to think or feel anything else.

And that makes everyone around you feel like an enemy, and every innocuous expression feel like a veiled threat for you to grit your teeth and brace against. 

Where people loom behind their words, menacing and full of teeth, and you imagine them baring them in pleasure as they behold your discomfort. "Good," you can picture them saying, with unnerving ease. "You should be scared of us."

And then where, depending on your mood and the situation, you do one of two things:

  1. Retreat from people and turn your attention inwards to your own works, only to find that the drone persists -- and everything you create feels like it's in someone else's voice, cloying and loathsome, and you can't think because of this damn noise.
  2. Look outwards and regard those you feel threatened by, and stir with anger as the drone modulates into something less dissonant and more seductively harmonic, and picture yourself lashing out in revenge for imagined attacks. "Fuck them," you think, "for what they did to me. Or...okay, maybe they didn't, but they would."  And then you remember that screaming "Fuck you preemptively!" at people is not a sane or harmless thing to do. But the drone is still there, and you still can't think.
Avatar

6 Types of Love

Avatar
nocbot-blog
Eros a passionate physical and emotional love based on aesthetic enjoyment; stereotype of romantic love
Ludus a love that is played as a game or sport; conquest; may have multiple partners at once
Storge an affectionate love that slowly develops from friendship, based on similarity
Pragma love that is driven by the head, not the heart
Mania obsessive love; experience great emotional highs and lows; very possessive and often jealous lovers
Agape selfless altruistic love; spiritual

Five Additional Types Of Love (Based On Poorly Construction Neologisms)

Shippa love by proxy; where you desire the object of your love to start being a thing with *that* person *over there*

Cringea a love that you feel kind of gross about for a bunch of reasons but that you keep indulging when no one is looking

Habos a desperate, protective love of something that's just been *there* for so long that it seems important and necessary, regardless of whether it's actually making you feel good or not

Pentatempos an all-consuming love of the best thing you have ever seen, to be replaced by a new thing in five minutes

Matra a love for one who is a precious, precious babby

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.