It really isn't that complicated, and the entire affair is actually very simple when you lay it out as such: Israel is trying to exterminate the people of Gaza, as much as it finds practical.
You can explain the exact rhetorical game played by the White House, you can exclaim with incredulity that a hospital is attacked while messages of peace are loudly blared, and you can run around in circles forever - or you can see that, yes, they know, everyone involved knows exactly what is happening, and that is exactly why they are doing it. They bomb the hospitals and block the food because they want to depopulate the area by force. They call everyone out into the open with promises of aid and then bomb them because they want to kill as many people as possible.
Now, the economic reasons for *why* millions upon millions of generals, politicians, corporate executives, and plain settlers have all united in the shared goal of committing genocide are important, because they demonstrate clearly what moves will and will not be taken next - but sitting there politely and untangling all the statements put out to say 'look, actually, the guy who killed thousands might have said something that could be interpreted as racist' or 'inconsistently, the pilot who just bombed that school claimed there was a resistance fighter, but the picture is from the next intersection' is just willingly engaging in the game they want you to be playing against them.
I'd rather be playing a game I can beat them at, one they've demonstrated themselves to be very bad at, and one they keep on losing at whenever they're forced to play it. 🔻
