About Luke, the Jedi and “attachment”...
So The Book of Boba Fett - Episode 6 came out and it was *muah* chef’s kiss.
But a lot of viewers seem to be disappointed with how Luke Skywalker is training Grogu. In the episode, he (and Ahsoka) both seem to adhere to the notion that a Jedi shouldn’t have attachments, like the Prequel Jedi did.
Why would he do such a thing? Aren’t the Jedi teachings what made Anakin fall in the first place? Well, the thing is… there’s nothing wrong with the Prequel Jedi’s teachings.
Luke training Grogu the same way the Prequel Jedi did is really not that surprising.
Bit of a long answer, but I put lots of pictures and GIFs to make it enjoyable :)
1. Lucas says the Jedi teachings aren’t the problem.
[Lucas quotes about Jedi teachings & attachment can be found on this post]
First off, the notion that “the strict Jedi teachings are ‘wrong’ and the Jedi failed Anakin” and that’s what the Prequels are all about is purely fanon.
Cuz that’s sure as hell not what George Lucas says they’re about… no, what he says the Prequels are about is:
- How a democracy becomes an Empire (aka, Palpatine’s rise).
- How a good man becomes evil (aka, Anakin’s fall).
[Quotes on what the Prequels are about can be found on this other post]
Secondly: the Jedi rules are, indeed, strict… but that’s not a bad thing.
Because while anyone can be a Jedi, being a Jedi is not for everyone. Fact is, being a Jedi is a hard thing to do.
It’s all about selflessly serving others, saving lives the best way you can and doing your duty.
It’s not a hobby, it’s a whole way of life. So you can’t be a “part-time” Jedi… if you wanna be one, you need to commit to the Jedi path.
So the Jedi rule of forgoing attachment doesn’t mean forgoing relationships or emotions. A Jedi can love, a Jedi can have friends.
But seeing as being a Jedi is about duty and greater good over your own selfish desires… if the time comes where you need to choose between saving 1,000 people in a burning building and your best buddy… you gotta do your duty and prioritize the 1,000 people.
That’s what that “no attachment” means. Duty over personal attachments.
And Grogu & Din Djarin’s relationship is a tight one, right?
If there’s a burning building, Grogu will likely prioritize saving Din, because he loves him. And viceversa. Which is a very normal reaction (because they’re basically father and son), and it wouldn’t - at all - make Grogu a bad person…
… but it would make him a bad Jedi (which could lead to him falling to the Dark Side, like Anakin).
And that’s why Luke is making him choose. The Jedi path is a very difficult one and while Grogu’s already been initiated… his heart isn’t in it. He misses Din.
2. Luke and the Jedi Order.
So after this episode of Book of Boba Fett came out, there’s this outcry of fans on Twitter saying two things:
- ‘Luke would never teach the “non-attachment” rule because it’s his attachment for Vader that allowed to change his father.’
- ‘The fact that he is teaching it is like the old Prequel Jedi would is indicative of his inevitable failure, in TLJ.’
Both statements also do not align with Lucas’ vision.
First off, it doesn’t help that Luke from the Legends continuity is okay with attachment and even gets married (which George Lucas never liked).
But also… it’s not Luke’s attachment for his father that allowed him to turn Vader back to the Light Side. It’s his love. A very selfless form of love: compassion.
Luke is furious at Vader, for taking his hand, killing his friends, threatening Leia. But despite that rage, he makes the hard choice… and rejects it.
And in doing so, he turns his back on the Dark Side, the easy path.
He lets go of his anger for Vader and chooses his love for Anakin.
Which inspires Anakin to do the same.
Lucas makes it very clear that there is a very big difference between selfish love (attachment) and selfless love (compassion). A Jedi lives off of the latter.
A Jedi can and should love selflessly. And that’s what Luke does.
So the notion that somehow, “Luke rose beyond the dogmatic teachings of the Jedi and found a middle path” is so inaccurate it hurts. I mean, I already talked about it in this post, but let’s look at the facts:
- He faces Vader while ready physically and mentally, instead of letting his emotions rule him and rushing into danger. AKA, practicality over heroism.
- He sacrifices himself and lets Vader capture him, so that Leia and the others can carry out the mission.
- He tries to talk to Vader, get him to see reason.
- Rather than murdering him in a fit of rage, Luke lets go of his anger and stays true to the Jedi way.
That’s all standard Jedi stuff.
Like, look at how Lucas describes what a Jedi normally does (left), versus what Luke does (right):
See what I mean? There’s pretty much no difference.
Luke isn’t “better than” or “rejecting the rules” of the Jedi who came before him. He’s following the Jedi path.
Which brings us to Luke in TLJ.
In TLJ, Luke says that following the Jedi path is a mistake, and that the Jedi teachings lead to failure.
I think a lot of people forget that… well… Luke is wrong, in TLJ. As Rian Johnson puts it:
Bottom line, Luke fucked up. Right here:
He saw a horrible vision of the future and considered killing his nephew. So points to him for not going on a rampage, like he did with Vader in ROTJ… but still. Big mistake.
And his reaction to this mistake is blaming it on the Jedi teachings and the Jedi path… when it’s his own personal failure.
He’s saying “I failed because I’m a Jedi Master, and as long as there are Jedi you’ll always have Sith so I’m taking myself outta the equation” and bla bla bla, when, actually, he messed up because he’s human and even the wisest humans are flawed and make mistakes.
Luke’s arc in TLJ is understanding that he failed…
… and learning from his failure.
Which is why he acknowledges that the Jedi teachings had nothing to do it with it and the Jedi should not die out.
So Luke in Episode 6 of Book of Boba Fett is VERY consistent with both Lucas’ view of the Jedi’s teachings and Luke’s character.