Avatar

Slow Cheetah

@fromthewetsand / fromthewetsand.tumblr.com

I go by both Arthur and Thaleia, and I was born in 1990. You do the math as to how old I am because updating once a year is too much effort. While this is mostly just reblogs, you can find what I have to say in the tags #my life and #my thoughts. they/them pronouns preferred.
Avatar

all goofing aside I genuinely don't understand the urge to reimagine Taylor Allison Swift as a secretly queer icon when the pop music scene(TM) is like. literally overflowing with women who actually like women. Gaga and Kesha and Miley and Halsey are right there. Rina Sawayama and Hayley Kiyoko and Rebecca Black and Kehlani and Victoria Monét and Miya Folick if you're willing to get slightly less top 100. Janelle and Demi for them nonbinary takes on liking girls. like what are we doing here. like I'm not even saying you can't enjoy Taylor but why would you hang all your little gay hopes on her.

Isn’t Lady Gaga bisexual?

yes that is indeed why she's on the list of famous women who like women

why have multiple people reblogged this with some horse-assed "um actually most of these people are bi or pan" did I fucking stutter I said they like girls. what is your point. I'm going to kill you.

POV: you make a good post and then encounter tumblr reading comprehension

btw to just clarify for anyone who sees this reblog of this post

op is basically saying something along the lines of "yea ik taylor swift is bi but like. why is she y'all's only lgbtq+ pop icon when there are all these other lgbtq+ people in the pop scene???"

i might have worded this badly but hopefully i got the main point across

hi op here I certainly did not fucking say Taylor Swift is bi

Avatar
cealvan

Op is saying that liking Taylor for being QUEER or Lgbtqia+ is not a bad thing, but to also know she is not the only one.

He did not call anyone in the original post lesbian bi or pan.

He did call two people NB

you have to be fucking with me there's no way

Avatar
reblogged

potentially triggering but ultimately harm reductionist statement about how people treat those with suicide ideation below, just a warning!

it's pretty fuckin rich that people tell suicidal people that they're "being selfish" by wanting to die, because it could not be more selfish to expect someone to just continue suffering through a life they do not want simply because their death would make them sad.

the people who say that kind of thing never want to offer any genuine help to the suicidal person that will change their life circumstances in a lasting way. they never want to house them, get them medical care, pay off their debts, introduce them to new friends, nurse them through a years-long trauma recovery process, get them a pet, drive them to a support group every week, buy them their groceries, clean their house, listen to them talk about their tough feelings for the millionth time.

lasting healing within a dramatically different and better life is never what they want for the suicidal person. they just want the person to not do anything that would make them sad. and not look too sad when they are around them, either, because even if they do white-knuckle their way through a painful existence, they are expected to also make it look easy.

but it's funny, isn't it, that by pushing away all thoughts of sadness, all thoughts of suicide, the person who says such a dismissive thing to the suicidal person is revealing how much they are on the brink of despair themselves. if, when faced with a suicidal person, your number one goal is to prevent their suicide for the sake of your own emotions rather than to improve circumstances for the suicidal person themselves, well, your own emotional grip on reality must be quite tenuous indeed. if you think the most important emotionally reality about a suicide is how it impacts you and not the person that has done it, well, you really must think that it's normal to expect other people to just constantly silently suffer for one another.

there's almost a bit of sick envy that i sometimes hear when people claim that they suicidal are "selfish." the statement almost seems to betray that everybody thinks of suicide at one point or another, that everyone has been in enough pain before that they've wished for it to end, but that since they have endured, they expect everyone else to endure the same for them, so that they don't slip into despair again as well.

it's so offensive because it is such a deeply missed opportunity. instead of batting away the statements of a suicidal person as if they were the greatest, most evil taboo, a person could really sit with them in their despair and say hey, I have felt that way too.

If only we lived in a world where acknowledgement of suicide ideation was not so taboo. Even psychologists and psychiatrists treat it as this untouchable thing, they freak out and jump into action and rob you of your body autonomy if you are willing to voice that you have thought of it. but virtually everyone has thought of it at one point or another, and some live with thoughts of it all the time forever but still have basically decent lives that they experience as worthwhile.

the legal apparatus that exists to prevent suicides at all costs have made it too risky for any kind of healthcare professional to allow the frank acknowledgement of suicide ideation to happen. hell, even the protections that have evolved online to supposedly "protect" suicidal people by filtering out content about suicide and redirecting those browsing for information about it to suicide prevention resourcse has, counterproductively, served to make the state of suicidality even more unspeakable. it cannot be spoken about, cannot be posted about, cannot be acknowledged, is not permitted, is never allowed to just be.

and that harms suicidal people so much.

we are so deeply selfish and cowardly in how we approach suicide and suicidal people.

This is so refreshing to hear. Recently I was on a trans focused reddit thread about if you would sacrifice all of your memories to be reborn as the opposite sex. (r/asktransgender for the curious. I just checked, and OP deleted the post so I don't think I can link it here) and a bunch of people in the comments were saying yes emphatically. I called this out as basically suicide and got the anti suicide reply bot while dozens of other people who WERE effectively suicidal didn't. By masking language about suicide, we don't make it disappear. The language just changes. Just like all the "unalive" bullshit on tiktok that has also spread elsewhere.

Avatar
reblogged

I think grammatically, I prefer themself, but I often default to plural subject verb agreement. It's difficult to say what I actually say in the moment.

Avatar
Avatar
sophelstien

in this essay, i want to discuss harrowhark's religious beliefs as an integral aspect of her character, how that intersects with the political landscape of the locked tomb, personal identity, and what i believe to be the text's major indictment of christianity as a social, political, and ideological force. when reading this essay, i want to pull a quote from the end of ntn to keep in mind:

the main ideas i want to take away from this quote, to start, are about harrow's identity (the child of the nine houses, the reverend daughter, mother, and father), how that identity demands action from her, and her drive to find something divine within the contexts of ninth religion.

religion is inextricable from culture—to varying degrees, but on ninth, the religion is their culture. it is a theocratic state: daily life is in accordance to religious custom and all citizens are required to attend religious services; all time, money, and energy is spent on the upkeep of religious iconography, vestments, and treasures; and the heads of state are also the heads of the church. the society's ultimate goal serves a religious purpose: to guard a sacred tomb and the corpse inside of it. they are separated from the other houses through deep cultural rifts and class disparity, require strict adherence to their culture even for outsiders, and maintain a deeply orthodox society. the ninth house is a cult of religious extremists who dedicate themselves entirely to death. their culture is stuck in a dark past they do not understand. they are obsessed with the apocalypse, concern themselves solely with a corpse whose identity is hidden from them, and they blindly dedicate themselves to this worship.

this is the society that created harrowhark. harrow was beget from mass death, and from infanthood she was raised to dedicate herself to the death that created her and the death that is the core of her society. it is her entire identity. it is also at odds with who she truly is at her core; the moment harrow is able, she commits her religion's biggest taboo—rolling away the rock that is to never be rolled away, despite its prophesied apocalyptic consequences. harrow becomes a heretic at age ten, defying the foundational tenet of her religion, and then she is punished and shamed so thoroughly for it that she keeps it a secret into her adult life. the consequences of this are permanent, and they are personal. it shapes her forever.

(also, she kisses the corpse, the corpse who she decides is a girl. in-universe, the sin is breaking into the tomb, but allegorically, this is entirely about lesbianism, falling victim to temptation and desire, and defying the law of the patriarch—that is, the church. she also refuses to conceive, which is the only thing that can save her society from finally dying. harrow's lesbianism is a major aspect holding her back from being truly dedicated to the religion she is so obsessed with. her lesbianism is stuck between her teeth; it is something she can pass over, but she can't ignore it. she rolls away the rock and it ruins her life, and it shapes her life, and it's something she is deeply ashamed of and it's what made her a leader and a lyctor. she is being pulled in different directions, one where she is a devout religious leader, one where she is a traitor to her faith, one where she is a monster made out of a genocide, and one where she is a victim of the religion as a whole. her identity is scattered yet firm. she cannot let any of this go. she is pathologically obsessed.)

to be honest, this post is about more than just harrowhark. this post is also about christian reformationists, both in this fandom and in our society as a whole. in the quote that i pulled, harrow mentions that she might be able to find a new god, but this time in alecto; to me, this rings of politically progressive christian reformation and redirection. how can harrow find a "new" god when every other aspect of her religion is the same? does picking a new object of worship, but still working within the religious scaffolding created by john, change or heal her? does it have an impact on ninth society? does it stop the cancerous spread of necromancy, which is the core of the empire and its faith?

harrowhark cannot reform this religion. she cannot reconcile an extremist, death cult version of christianity with any lifestyle that encourages...well, life. if harrow does dedicate herself to the body in the tomb, she is still defining herself through death, but instead of the death of 200, it is the death of billions, the entire planet. not only can she not reform ninth religion, she can't reform house religion, either, because its main tenet—necromancy—is entirely focused on death and how to exploit it. and, beyond that, no one person can reform a society; john felt that he alone was qualified to change the world, and the john chapters themselves are heavily critical of the myth of jesus christ and the "chosen one" narrative. no one person can change society, there is no chosen one, and anyone who thinks they are is a demagogue whose power will spiral out of control. to me, the john chapters and harrowhark's rejection of his narrative is a scathing criticism of christianity's fundamental ideology: that the divine power of god is channeled through individuals, and that those individuals are special and elevated above the rest of humanity—and, therefore, the people who worship those individuals are superior to those who do not. john believes in his own superiority, has set up a society to keep him all-powerful, but harrowhark, in all of her contradictions and self-suppression, is finally disillusioned enough to walk away—but walking away is simply the first step, not the last.

so, the fandom's tendency to celebrate harrow's stated goal at the end of ntn to find her own religion still within the context of ninth's religion, but ✨on her own terms✨ reminds me of a very real and pervasive phenomenon of queer people joining "progressive" churches and no-true-scotsman-ing christianity; those other christians are wrong, my church doesn't do those things and therefore christianity as a whole is absolved—completely disregarding the foundational ideological underpinnings of the faith, its historical (and modern!) usage as a tool for conquest, and its inescapable hegemonic force over western society and thought. if harrow chooses alecto as her new god, nothing changes. ninth religion and its extremist, bioessentialist beliefs will still be a part of harrowhark, and she will forever be totally defined by a religion that prioritizes death over life, even if she finds someone else to worship. i don't find this satisfying, and as political commentary, i don't find it productive.

i have discussed this before, but i believe that tlt's political core is about radical change. john failed to reconcile 21st century issues because instead of aiming to dismantle the system that caused his predicament, he worked inside of it and tried to use its own tricks against it; when that failed to the worst degree, he rebuilt that society with its same issues intact. i don't think that tlt is going to have a happy ending, but i do think that harrow and john, as protagonist and antagonist, are diametrically opposed to one another, and i can only hope that she will make a choice that will ultimately tear john down.

so this brings me to my last point: there is a deeply political dimension to harrowhark's choice regarding her religion. religion is often framed as a personal choice, which, in some ways, it is; but religion is also hegemonic, and by choosing to participate in a major world religion, one upholds hegemony in some way. and harrow is not just a follower of the religion, she is the reverend daughter, a religious leader who was actively fulfilling the role of a theocratic dictator. she used her position as a religious leader to oppress people beneath her—in fact, harrow textually uses her religious authority to perpetuate homophobia against gideon. she quite literally silences gideon using this theocratic authority. to me, the core of gideon and harrow's relationship arc in gtn is two very traumatized, thoroughly dehumanized people realizing that the other is a human person. their power imbalance that grew from a society split between indentured servants and people with a divine right to rule begins to break apart when they realize that they are not their society, they are simply shaped by it. harrow, of course, regresses in htn due to her lobotomy, and we see in her narration that she absolutely thinks of herself as her society—she is not a person, or even 200 people, she is the ninth. once again her personhood and humanity is robbed from her due to this divine belief that she represents a political body. all that is to say: if harrow chooses to maintain the religion as it is, she gains no autonomy, at odds with a central theme of the series, and she perpetuates the same cycle that hurt her and so many generations before her. and perhaps that what tamsyn muir will choose to do! but if she does, i don't think it will be framed as a positive, but as a tragedy.

and one last thing before i go—a note about ianthe: ianthe is not religious. she refuses to say the group prayer at the beginning of gtn, she blasphemes casually and pointedly throughout htn and ntn, and she obviously does not respect john as a god the way harrow does. i bring this up because ianthe is the saint of awe. she is a religious leader in every way that harrowhark is, but it looks very different, because she is thoroughly academic and political about it, no faith required. lyctors are god's inner circle, and they carry out his wishes—and we see ianthe do just that. ianthe comes down to lemuria with the strength of the cohort behind her and declares martial law. she has been given the divine right to do this. there is no untangling religion from politics from culture from military from legislation. just like ours, this is a world deeply shaped by enormously powerful religions. even people who are working within the system while being ostensibly atheist are abiding by and perpetuating religious rule. there are cultural variations, but everyone in the nine houses share the same basic beliefs: that their leader is a man who became god by bringing necromancy to mankind, and he should be worshiped and served by spreading this practice and ideology. in the minutia of the ninth, they practice this by maintaining the tomb, but in the grand scheme of the empire, this is practiced through brutal expansionism and colonialism. these practices are inherently tied to the religion, and necromancy is their religious praxis.

there is a near-ubiquitous agreement in this fandom that one of tlt's major themes is colonialism. despite this, there is a tendency of both cultural christians and practicing christians to become extremely defensive when the religious aspect of that colonialism gets brought up. it is framed as a personal choice, and therefore all political implications become invalidated by the divine. but i think that tlt is incredibly critical of christianity and its integral role in colonization, as well as its long-lasting ramifications on the psyches of people raised within it who cannot possibly meet its standards. i have no idea what is going to happen in alecto—i don't make a habit of theorizing, because whatever tamsyn muir chooses to do will be beyond what i can imagine, i think—but i don't think harrow is going to completely abandon spirituality as a whole. spirituality and faith is a central aspect of her character, and religion is something that has shaped all of us, for better or for worse, even if you weren't raised in it. my hopes, though, are that we get a deep questioning of the faith, its power, and its merit, and that, in some way or another, harrow achieves the autonomy she has been denied for so long.

Avatar
Avatar
saintjosie
Anonymous asked:

Being transfem really exposes just how completely full of shit society is about breasts, huh? Like apparently there was some nebulous point sometime after I started E where it stopped being okay to have my tits out in public because....... reasons i guess? Just an arbitrary event horizon of indecency

you don’t think i’m a woman? that’s fine i guess that means i can go topless everywhere now

Avatar

In 2011, Andrea Jones's request to have her gender changed on her driver's licence (why does that even need to be on there) was denied.

In protest, she stripped to the waist in the DMV car park as, if she was a man as they insisted, this would be fine.

She was arrested for indecent exposure, which this only was because she was female, but was charged as a man anyway and spent three weeks in jail.

This was thirteen years ago but it still boils my piss. To be labelled a fraud and a faker until they can use the truth to brand you a criminal, and even then rewriting the law to invalidate your existence as they do so.

Avatar
Avatar
bowserwife

The entire idea of the egg as "someone who is trans but ~doesn't realize it yet~" instead of "someone who would clearly be happier if they chose to be trans" has broken a lot of people's brains

No one is trans. Everyone is trans. Most people live their entire lives not realizing that being trans is just An Option for them that they could take at any given time--and furthermore, most people will resist this knowledge even when they're beaten over the head with it. We should be asking everyone, absolutely everyone: "Did you know that you can do whatever you want?, and also "Are you really sure that you know what you want?" And we should ask them over and over again until they also want to destroy this gendered nightmare.

Avatar
Avatar
eskildit

okay question: how did you imagine the dish abigail and magnus served at their anniversary dinner?

what food is this. i ask myself this on every reread what food is this. 

because i am who i am, i of course imagined it as something like zereshk polo,

rice (white and fluffy boiled grain) with barberries (tiny tart fruits) and topped with pistachios (chopped nuts)

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
liesmyth
Anonymous asked:

Do you think the Nine Houses follow a Marxist, Keynsian, or Austrians economic model

this ask made me SO happy you have no idea! some vague thoughts

The Houses obviously have to do careful resource allocation. I doubt they have a free market economy, at least not on a system-wide scale. I could see some of the Houses — like the Third or Fifth Houses, which are by all accounts wealthy and with a very large population — develop some kind of internal capitalist economy within the House itself. Namely, private actors who control and own properties, wealth accumulation, competitive markets etc. But ultimately I think even those are subject to strong (local) governmental oversight because, again, they live on space installations in a situation of constant resource constraint. I bet there are quotas for everything.

However! No way ALL the Houses have a market economy. I'm thinking especially those Houses that are very small and/or have a "mission" which means that societal development is carefully planned, and probably the economy is also centrally planned. (Ninth, Eight, Sixth, maybe Second and/or Fourth).

On an overreaching scale (within the Home System) I don't think "the Empire" (as in, John) is overly concerned with the yearly economic development of the Houses, partly because he's been historically absent for decades or even centuries at a time. Verging sharply into headcanon territory, I think the closest thing the Houses have to a real centralised government is military leadership (High Command or the Fleet Admiral, who's the head of the Second House) and when it comes to issues that concern multiple Houses but are more "civilian" in nature, is kind of a free-for-all. I'm thinking about how Harrow thought that writing to ask for help would result in the Fifth or maybe the Third cannibalising the Ninth House — it looks like there's an informal council of House leaders, but no properly organised central government.

Trade: travel and commerce between the Houses is regulated. You can't just take a spaceship and move from the Eight to the Second, for example — movement of people as well as goods depends on a ship schedule that runs on "routes" and I'd bet there's an immigration/emigration quota that's maybe decided between specific House leaders, or maybe a third party. My best bet is that one of the Houses (possibly the Third or Fifth) OR an ad-hoc organisation (which includes multiple higher-ups from said well-off Houses) are the ones who regulate shipping and travel, and either have an ownership stake in the shipping system or administrate it in the name of the Emperor.

The shepherded planets: putting the "imperialism" in "Empire". The Houses definitely exploit their colony planet for resources, as per AYU (talking about the "contracts" that the Empire signs with the occupied planets). However, it's also worth noting that 1) for at least 5000 years, the House system was self-sustaining and hadn't made contact with any other population; and 2) stele travel is kind of a hassle, and only seems to be limited to Cohort ships that we know of.

What I'm getting at is that I think the economy of the Houses is not dependent on their war of conquest — imo it's more of a mission of conquest for conquest's sake, see Corona thinking that the economy of the Houses doesn't quite add up, and Augustine talking like the ongoing expansion of the Houses is a whim of John's and little else. Basically, it seems to be a way to oppress the occupied planet for occupation's sake, and I wouldn't be surprised if the resources the Houses extract from the conquered planets go straight into financing yet more war and occupation and very little (if any) of any wealth they may accumulate makes it back to the Houses.

It COULD be that there's a necromantic equivalent of the East India Company, and my bet would be on the Second administrating it — Harrow doesn't seem to rate them at all, which tracks because Harrow's primary concern is Houses that could be a threat to the Ninth, and the Second being focused on exploitation that's external to the Home System could be an explanation for that. I've also seen speculation that making money from colonialism is the Fifth House's purview (*) but EYE think it makes more sense if the House that are more strongly associated with running the war effort are also the ones making money from it. Or it could be a joint operation.

Anyway. Sorry I haven't answered your actual question! GUN TO MY HEAD, if I had to pick ONE economic model to map the Houses onto, I wanna say soviet type economy (think: centralised planning, no inflation, little to no unemployment, tendency towards black market, little to no innovation). I have thoughts about what the consumer needs market looks like in the Houses but nobody needs to hear that. Also, it's def very limited

If anyone has thoughts PLEASE feel free to jump in, I'm always thinking about the logistical side of space imperialism in the necro empire!

Avatar
Avatar

I’ve got Silas Octakiseron rotating in my brain today. He arrives at Canaan knowing what Glaurica told him about Gideon and the Ninth house and wanting to be a lyctor. At that point he seems to hate both Gideon and Harrow.

Then he does one trial, which we know is Anastasia’s trial since he gets the black key from it. He does not go into the lyctoral room to learn the theorem behind the trial; in fact, he later says that he no longer wants to be a lyctor at all and that he believes none of them should. At some point his attitude towards Gideon also changes from hate/disgust to still disgust but a willingness to address her as a victim of the Ninth house and to encourage her to betray Harrow.

It begs the question: what the actual fuck was Anastasia’s trial??? Whatever it involved, it obviously reinforced his opinion of the Ninth as a house of horrors, but it also turned him off the entire idea of lyctors and made him decide that turning the holy land of Canaan house to a trial ground was heresy (even tho Jod is the one who did that!).

There is also this quote from when Silas and Colum are arguing:

« Brother Asht, said Silas, quite gently, « your heart is true »
« Every day we spend here I’m less sure about that, » said Colum.
« I share your feelings, but —»

What!!! Did the trial have them do!!!!! That it shook the both of them that way! Silas and Colum are the least likely people to balk at a necromancer using his cavalier the way that the other trials seem to involve… so what could have been so spectacularly different in the Ninth’s trial that it spooked them so??

Also once Gideon leaved their rooms she thinks that she owes Colum a big one. This doesn’t come back because the next time they meet Colum and Silas die, but I believe that it still might become relevant later down the line in Alecto. After all, Silas in Harrow’s dream bubble was hella pissed to be there, offed everyone that he could find who weren’t « really » there but just dream-bubble-NPCs (like Corona) and left, but we never actually see Colum in the dream bubble. It I remember correctly, I’m not sure he’s even mentioned by name. My belief is that Silas went looking for him.

Now, whether Colum is beyond the river — beyond the stoma — or elsewhere remains to be seen, but I think that we’ll see the both of them again in Alecto. And if I’m right, then I think that at a crucial moment, Colum might appeal to Kiriona to cash in that favour.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
direquail

I think what bothers me most about how John is talked about in the fandom is the implication that a different (implied: better) person would've done things differently and somehow more right than he did.

When the text goes to lengths to explore how suddenly coming into an incredible amount of power in a fatally constrained situation cannot lead to a good outcome.

If you're putting John in dialogue with the concept of the "magical girl", which Muir has said he is (a little tongue in cheek, but)--these are young, often profoundly unready people, who often get taken advantage of by the people who give them their powers. And like, yes, John is not a teenager, but I think that's part of the point, is that at no point is a person really prepared to become as powerful as he did--even before he merged with Alecto. Even when he was fully in control of his powers, even when they were given with honest intent and trust, even when he used them with the best of intentions and tried to do the right thing, there was no way for him to be prepared, especially given the situation he was in.

And it's funny to talk about how bad John must be in bed, but also, this isn't a scenario where John is some self-deluding Elon Musk-like villain or loser. He is genuinely trying to do the right thing, in terms of rescuing the Earth's population, rescuing the Earth Herself, and doing it ethically (see: M--'s insistence that they perfect the cryo containers until they could transport pregnant women).

I really do think this is something people are blocking out, because it is one of the uncomfortable parts of Muir's message with the series. But ESPECIALLY because the people "critiquing" him as an embodiment of patriarchy and empire are failing to see that part of Muir's critique is of human vulnerability to power: That is, that power corrupts.

And this even has echoes with Gideon & Harrow's story! Harrow begins the series in a deeply unequal dynamic with Gideon! And she does horrible things, not just because she is traumatized, but because she is traumatized and has the power to act her desires out on Gideon. She might have the motive (trauma), but that's not enough without the means (power).

And, yeah, I do have a semi-salty angle on this because people are frequently loath to think critically not just about axes of oppression but individual relationships of power when it applies to them and to people they like. ESPECIALLY when there is a very vocal segment of the fandom that is enthusiastically pro-harassment. It's very convenient to villainize John and actively dis-identify with him, because otherwise, you'd have to face the question of whether you'd do any better in his place. But the thing is, the mission of revenge he embarks on is a lot closer to many peoples' hearts than they'd like to consider.

That's the whole point.

Avatar

The Locked Tomb Series Official Reading Order:

- The Iliad

- The Bible

- The Apocryphal Book of Judith

- Dante's Inferno and Paradise Lost

- Don Quixote

- Annabelle Lee by Edgar Allan Poe

- Revolutionary Girl Utena

- Homestuck

- Umineko

- Gideon the Ninth

- The Mysterious Study of Doctor Sex

- Lolita

- Harrow the Ninth

- Harrow the Ninth Again

- The Barbie Movie

- As Yet Unsent

- Nona the Ninth

Avatar
Avatar
prokopetz

I think one of the starkest illustrations of how incoherent Hasbro's goals for Dungeons & Dragons are is that they made the writers take out all the direct references to dragon-fucking in 5E in a bid to render the IP more advertiser-friendly, but still insisted upon keeping a bunch of stuff whose narrative context strongly implies dragon-fucking front and centre in the brand identity, so now the Player's Handbook has gotta play coy about where dragon-blooded sorcerers come from.

"Perhaps one of your ancestors [MADE A BARGAIN] with a dragon, or perhaps you're the first of a new sorcerous bloodline as a result of a [BARGAIN] with a dragon". Yeah, I bet it was quite the "bargain".

Avatar
archis-kaito

Unbelievably huge dragon d[ISCOUNT]

Avatar
roach-works

sometimes the bargain is 'i wish to purchase a liter of your blood for unspecified purposes' and sometimes the bargain is 'i bet that'll fit'

Avatar
Avatar
ierotits

international people start calling our country aotearoa instead of new zealand challenge

aotearoa is the te reo name for our country, commonly translated as "land of the long white cloud" as the story goes Kupe was guided to our whenua by following a long white cloud in the sky. new zealand is a name which was forced on us by colonizers who stole our precious land less than 200 years ago. by reverting back to the māori name you are metaphorically giving the land back to the tangata whenua, the people of the land, and we can begin to normalize using the proper names for things that should have always belonged to māori

heres a link to a good pronunciation, i recommend practicing saying it along to the video. but please remember that even if you cant get it perfect, say it anyway!! its better to try and get it slightly wrong than not try at all

here’s another pronunciation guide that goes into more detail about how vowels are pronounced in te reo and the structure of the correct pronunciation!

while you're at it, sign te pāti māori's petition to officially change the country's name! anyone from anywhere can sign, please support this kaupapa to restore naming rights to tāngata whenua!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.