I’m an criminal defense attorney. I’m not a youtuber, because I actually practice law (and I think that’s important to note with the youtubers that are commentating…they want to be future courttv correspondents, they don’t want to practice. practicing law is harrowing and a lot of people try to find a way out of it bc of the pressure. for example, I bet heard’s lawyers are absolutely torn up by the response to their work…which has been normal at its worst and stellar at its best, but everyone’s commentating on it like they have any idea how to conduct a cross examination. and JD was kind of a hostile witness, I’d be absolutely over him. basically the lawyer youtubers are trying to gain a following by taking the popular stance so they don’t have to go back to their shitty firms.) anyway, I wouldn’t have wanted to be johnny’s lawyer in a criminal court. after examining the evidence (the real kind that was proffered to the court), I think he would have been convicted for simple battery for the boston plane incident, and potentially felony battery for the james corden incident. to me, both of those could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. even in incidents that seem clear to me that she hit or has hit him, it isn’t apparent to me that any of his claims could reach a criminal standard. his allegations are vague and they all have practically built in defenses in her favor that cause doubt. mostly because he doesn’t even really allege anything specific, just “she has hit me” okay, when? where? did you or did you not shoot down your own “proof” by admitting to it being your own doing? if there are so many videos why haven’t they been admitted into evidence? why is the metadata on your audio and pictures from random times not corresponding to your testimony? doubt doubt doubt
This is extremely informative. Thank you!
