Avatar

Whatever?

@percysowner / percysowner.tumblr.com

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

hey can i ask what tweet was deleted that everyones talking about?

This one:

Hellers are still pissed the ugly old angel wasn’t in it obviously.

Avatar
Avatar
nancylou444

Why the fuck did he delete it? Has he no balls? William Shatner wouldn’t have deleted it. I sure as shit wouldn’t delete something that pissed THEM off.

Block THEM, keep the tweet.

He did block a bunch of them but, you know how they are, stomp on one cockroach and they make more sock accounts. XD I think he got tired of the drama and his notifications blowing up.

He also liked every bibro and Wincest reply before deleting. (¬‿¬)

Jim, a couple hours ago:

XD

Avatar
percysowner

I’m sad that he felt he had to delete the post. It was such a nice picture and a treat for REAL fans. Why couldn’t those jerkwads just leave it alone? I did read some of the comments and they were vicious.  He was doing something good and they ruined it.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
missjackil

If you are still doing asks. What is the worst thing the show did? Could be a character they added or killed or a storyline they did or didn't do

Avatar

In my opinion, something I’ll forever be pissed about is how they made up a random President in S12 when Obama had been brought up since S3, several times. Now, I know they wouldn't want to use Obama for such a storyline or any storyline, but that’s not the point, the point is they didn't need the President of The USA to knock up his aid to create a Nephilim. They could have very easily had Vince knock up his groupie, BOOM Nephilim, and have someone from the FBI recognize Sam and Dean from the News (as the News did report the event) and they would have been taken to Fed prison and they still could have done First Blood, but no, they invent a random character, break canon, never tell us what happened to him after, never even saying his name past “The President” again yet its ok to move right on to Trump the next season. It makes me think they think the audience doesn’t pay attention and we “wont notice” 

SPN Writers: We should have Lucifer possess the POTUS and get someone pregnant, make it look like Sam and Dean tried to kill him and we could have a fun jailbreak episode!

Singer and Dabb: Oh no, we can’t involve Obama Writers: No we’ll just make up a generic white guy to be POTUS for a single episode. The audience won't know the difference.

S&D: Sounds good to us!

GRRRRRR!!

Another thing that makes me mad is bringing back Sam and Dean being Lucifer and Michael’s vessels yet not close that arc. Not even give Sam the honor of killing Lucifer, give that to Michael, Dean and Jack. The arc with the vessels could have ended with Swan Song since fate was broken, but it got brought up again and sounded like a big part of the story since s11 and moreso since s13 but we didn’t get closure to that and it makes me mad.

Other things annoyed me like making Chuck a douche, but those piss me off the most :(

Avatar
Avatar
percysowner

The weird thing is they could have picked another high level person in the government, if they wanted. It could have been the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff because how many people know off hand who the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is? And since Trump has fired a ton of people, a different one would have fit in just fine. Plus that is someone the FBI and CIA would acted upon if they thought Sam and Dean tried to kill him

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
dv-samgirl

So was it Eileen, or some other woman?

I am guessing someone else, because they left the hunting life behind.

Does yound Dean know about monsters? He did have the anti possession tattoo.

Avatar
lih67

Young Dean had the tattoo? I need a rewatch. I missed that.

I don't think it was Eileen. Her face wasn't shown and had it been Eileen they would've shown her.

I think, since it wasn't Eileen, that Jack didn't resurrect the au hunters.

It was someone else.

Avatar
percysowner

The fuzzy woman in the background looked like she could have been Eileen. Also Eileen wasn’t an AU hunter, she was someone Chuck brought back. Now I don’t think Jack did bring back the AU hunters, but it’s not 100% clear. I know they said they wanted to bring back a lot more characters, but getting people from the US cleared for Canada was hard, so they cut out a lot of people they wanted us to see.

People who like Eileen and want her with Sam can think that, people who don’t can guess that he found someone else. I do think he would find an ex-hunter because they are the only people who would understand him.

Avatar
reblogged

This one is for the reeeally old-school fans.

Do you remember kroki_refur?

Well they have started uploading alllll of their stunning fic on AO3. So go have a nostalgic evening with vintage S1-4 Wincest!

Passenger is a personal fave and one of the all-time "best" possession stories out there. Hopefully part 2 will show up soon...

Have fun!

Avatar
denugis

kroki_refur is great. I wish their picspam meta and episode reactions weren’t lost forever.

But note a correction -- the vast majority of their fic is gen.

Avatar
percysowner

She was great. I really missed her when she stopped her picspam Meta. I’m glad her stories are available now.

Avatar
reblogged

“you’ve protected me from dad, from Lucifer, from everything”

… did I just remember seasons four and five… and six… and seven… and eight… and nine wrong or something?

Avatar
percysowner

1) Sam knows that this is how Dean views himself, so appealing to THAT delusion of himself makes sense.

2) Sam has been gaslit since season 4 and he may actually BELIEVE Dean’s version of how great Dean was. He has lived with Dean’s “I do everything for you, you always let me down” view of their relationship.

Basically I bought the speech even though I think it is not what I saw happen.

Avatar
reblogged

Am I missing something?  How is what Dean said to Sam, “protecting” him?  He didn’t tell Sam about the plan because he knew Sam would be pissed and not on board with it. I’m seeing all this talk about Dean protecting him but I saw Dean lying because he knew Sam wouldn’t go along with him. 

Avatar
percysowner

That’s Dean’s MO. He convinces himself that whatever he is doing is to “protect Sam”, so that he doesn’t have to examine his ethics.

He also only forgives people when they are dead or dying. He forgave Sam for Ruby only when Sam decided to take on Lucifer and throw himself into the Cage. He forgave Sam for daring to have a life while Dean was in Purgatory only after Sam almost died doing the Trials. Billie and Jack are right that Dean won’t forgive Jack until Jack atones by dying.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
nancylou444

You all were in such a hurry to get back to ‘normal’ that you forgot that NORMAL is still a long way from now. 

Anybody surprised that people are getting sick again? 

I’m going to blame all increases of corvid-19 cases on protestors (and rioters) and the idiot mayors, governors, and 1200 health workers that let them because apparently being politically correct is more important than health.

Most definitely. 

You want to protest, fine, but wear a fucking mask. 

Avatar
percysowner

Actually most of the protesters DID wear and ARE wearing masks. The numbers are coming out and there has not been a spike in COVID-19 cases in cities where there were major protests. The cities that have had spikes are ones where bars and restaurants opened. Some of those did have protests, but many cities without large protests have has spikes because of reopening and not using masks.

Avatar
reblogged

@awed-frog​-

I read her essay. As you may know, I’m a CSA/rape survivor. And since her essay is largely a discussion of trans issues within the context that sexual violence against women and children exists, that it is mainly perpetrated by men, and that she herself has a history of sexual assault and domestic abuse, and has been feeling triggered recently, my reply is from within that context:

Fear is not an excuse.

Sexual violence is a terrible thing to go through, and having PTSD is really, really hard. But the fact that someone else hurt me doesn’t give me license to then go out and hurt other innocent people because I’m afraid.

In Rowling’s fear, she is misrepresenting epidemiological data, spreading misinformation that increases discrimination and violence against trans people, and advocating for legalized discrimination. She doesn’t like it that trans activists have said she’s “killing trans people” with her hate, but guess what? The attitudes she both has herself and is furthering in others, are in fact killing trans people. I picked these studies semi-randomly; numerous others reach the same conclusions. The data is not reasonably open to debate. Transphobia kills, and support of trans youth and adults decreases suicide attempts and completed suicides, as well as other negative health consequences. Rowling can pretend that she supports “real” trans people, but supporting trans people literally means treating them as the gender they say they are, which is what she is advocating not doing.

You ask that people who have reblogged insults about Rowling treat this essay with intellectual honesty. I have reblogged insults against her, so here is me treating her essay with intellectual honesty:

last December I tweeted my support for Maya Forstater, a tax specialist who’d lost her job for what were deemed ‘transphobic’ tweets.

The ‘transphobic’ tweets in question, included “a long series of tweets, [in which] she repeatedly misgendered Credit Suisse senior director Pips Bunce, who identifies as gender fluid, referring to her as “a man who likes to express himself part of the week by wearing a dress,” ”a part-time cross dresser“ and ”a white man who likes to dress in women’s clothes.” “a link to a piece comparing the use of proper pronouns to the date rape drug rohypnol, and her commentary in defense of not using people’s preferred pronouns”. (x) The judge in her case wrote that her views are so extreme as to be ‘not worthy of respect in democratic society’.

Her [Littman’s] paper caused a furore. She was accused of bias and of spreading misinformation about transgender people, subjected to a tsunami of abuse and a concerted campaign to discredit both her and her work. The journal took the paper offline and re-reviewed it before republishing it.

Her paper contained serious methodological errors, including biased sampling, and failure to survey transgender youth or their care providers, but only their parents, as well as using language throughout likening transgender status to a contagious illness. The paper was republished only after extensive rewriting by the author to address these and other issues.

I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class and offering cover to predators like few before it.

What is this “cover to predators like few before” Rowling is so concerned with? She specifically mentions the “dangers” of giving “men” who “think they are” women access to women’s public restrooms. There is no evidence to support safety or privacy concerns around transgender people’s use of the restrooms matching their stated gender (a, b, c), and she gives no other examples of what she deems to be the dangers of men dressing as women to prey on vulnerable women and girls. 

Her essay is very long; contains many other prejudices, vague fears, and misrepresentations presented as objective data; and I am tired. Very, very tired.

You want me to stop calling you a TERF, Rowling? Let my innocent, harmless daughter go to the goddamn bathroom.

Avatar
percysowner

Oh, Jesus, not the bathrooms AGAIN! This was the rallying cry against the Equal Right Amendment. I mean Jeez, every ladies room I’ve been in has a stall that locks. You lock the door, do your business, go out wash your hands and leave. It’s not a God Damned dark, unlit alley where no one can see you. It’s a public place where someone can walk in at any time, so, not private and scary.

The bathroom argument is the stupidest thing imaginable.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
lih67

FUCK THIS SHIT.

Avatar
percysowner

From the Discussing Movies Twitter description

Your leading source in UNRELIABLE NEWS and one of a kind content. Home for healthy and liberating discussion on all things PARODY culture.

It’s a stupid joke.

Avatar
reblogged

My in-universe reaction to Maxim and Rebecca is that she emotionally and psychologically abused him for years, and I don’t blame him for finally snapping.  My out-of-universe reaction is that it was fucked up on du Maurier’s part to signal that Rebecca was a bad woman by making her a promiscuous femme fatale stereotype.

Avatar
percysowner

Honestly, I have mixed feelings on Maxim. I don’t think he’s a reliable narrator about Rebecca and her actions. I mean he killed the woman, he’s not going to say she was great to him. Plus he marries a meek, quiet woman who will do whatever he wants, lets the housekeeper run roughshod over her, lets everyone tell her how WONDERFUL Rebecca was and watches as that just chips away at her self-esteem.

Certainly, in Maxim’s universe, Rebecca was an abusive monster, I just wonder what her view on their life would be.

The cliche that a totally non-violent, good, kind man would suddenly be pushed into having to murder his horrible, sluttish wife sounds way too much like how every other man who murders their wives talk or how men who beat their wives talk. It’s always “she made me do it”

It’s a great book, but I’ve never been clear on whether Maxim was really the victim here. After all, he’s still breathing and Rebecca isn’t.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
nancylou444
wow and this latest episode of SPN fetched a 0.2 in ratings.

This is the final season and the ratings SUCK.

Avatar
jo1027

Maybe because the episodes have sucked. The writers don’t care what they do to the show. And it appears the people who usually watch have given up as well.

SAD

Assuming that the scripts would have been the same, one has to wonder IF the show would have gotten renewed for a 16th season with these crappy ratings. 

We will never know. 

Avatar
missjackil

All CW shows episodes are .3 and under. SPN is still #3 so maybe y’all just ont understand whats going on with the ratings system overall with everyone watching later, or on their phones. #3 is still #3 

Avatar
percysowner

It is hard to say if they would have gotten renewed. I know for a while the Netflix deal was that what Netflix paid per episode varied by how many seasons the show had i.e. if you had 4 seasons of shows, they paid (example not real numbers) $350,000 per episode 5-10 seasons $500,000 per episode. 10 and up more than that. under that type of pricing, Supernatural was making so much money that it would be worth keeping it on the air because 300 episodes at those rates pretty much pays the new seasons.

Avatar
reblogged

Some of the random thoughts that didn’t make it into my 15.10 opinion post:

- Comedy is subjective so maybe this episode cracked y'all up I don’t know but I fail to see how any of it is funny

- Among the many comedy attempts that fell flat is Garth naming one of his kids after Castiel. It makes no sense for Garth to do such a thing, and I fail to see what’s funny about it. My only guess as to why it was done is so Dabb wouldn’t have to listen to the Cass stans bitch and whine about Castiel not being in the episode.

- Just like last week this episode was stupid, and I once more felt like I was losing IQ points as I watched it. 

-  It’s a shame that Jared and Jensen’s comedic talent was wasted in such a way in this episode

- This somehow manages to be worst and better than last week because the boys are together and neither feathers not Eileen is in it which is an improvement but the content of it is so bad that it’s somehow worst than last week.

- Among the things that annoy me is that what happens in this episode is most likely going to be undone in the next one making what happens here even more pointless, unnecessary and a cheap shot at the main characters/leads.

- Fuck you Andrew Dabb

Avatar
nancylou444

Yes off hand I can’t remember Garth ever meeting Castiel, so why the hell is he naming his kid after him? This is like Charlie calling him “dreamy” after reading the books.

I thought it was creepy enough that he would have names the boys Sam and Dean, but naming one Cass is ONLY for those fans.

Avatar
arkvark2

Did Garth met Castiel in last season’s mid seasons finale (The Spear?) when they went against Michael? Garth ended up in the impala trunk.

I just looked at the transcript and I don’t see any scenes where they are together. Even if they met off screen, I doubt they had memorable moments to the point of Garth naming a kid after Cass. 

Avatar
lih67

Yeah I’ve been thinking about this and at first this argument makes sense. Garth and Cas have never met as far as I remember so while it seemed cute and funny that he named his kid after Cas it did sort of felt like it was coming out of left field.

Obviously he heard the name Cas or Castiel from any person who has met Cas. There’s not only Sam and Dean but also Bobby and Kevin or even au!Michael.

In the end though Garth doesn’t have to meet Cas to just like the name. I will use myself as an example. I am named after a fictional character and a well-known Spanish singer/entertainer. My mother never met the singer and obviously she never met the character but she likes the names so those are my names.

I also like the following names myself: Micah, Malachi, Gabriel, Isabelle & Edessa. I have never met anyone with these names before but I love these names and should I ever have a kid those are the names I’m going to use. In the end Garth didn’t need to meet Cas in order for him to like the name enough to give it to his kid.

Anyway, it’s all just imo and it’s not like I don’t get the irritation of the naming. I just think there is a very simple in-verse reason for it. Garth just liked the name.

Avatar
percysowner

Garth and his wife had twins, it’s possible that they decided that he would name one and she would name the other. Castiel could mean something to her. It was done for comic effect, but really we don’t know why they chose the names they did.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
katsidhe

15.08 Final Thoughts

Hey guys, it’s the year 2019 and we have New Cage Canon!

I’m always a little uneasy whenever an episode brings up anything that could impact Cage Canon, because of all past Big Canon Things, it’s the Thing I’m most protective of. But damn if they didn’t knock it out of the park.

  1. All the awards to Jake Abel, who brought his fucking A game.
  2. Michael and Adam are now perhaps the very first example of benign angelic possession on SPN, with full consent and timeshare rights—even if they certainly didn’t begin that way, and even though their bond was formed in extreme circumstances, and with a large power differential. And yet. Michael is protective of Adam and offended on his behalf; Michael seems more than willing to let Adam go his own way, and even to accompany him in, like, getting an odd job or something?? Hahaha what was the plan there?
  3. Makes a stark contrast to Sam and Lucifer, don’t it? Two very, very different relationships, forged in the same place. I LOVE IT TO PIECES. It’s so interesting.
  4. Michael clearly saw Sam at least on occasion, knew what was happening to him, and from Sam’s reaction to him, didn’t intervene. Not that I would expect him to. But 15.08 also makes me think Michael never really harmed Sam, either, which is something I’ve been on the fence about given the relative dearth of evidence in either direction up to this point.
  5. How much did Michael blame Sam? How much did Adam? Did he ever ask Michael to intervene? How much did he resent Sam, how much did he pity him?
  6. What did Michael and Adam see when Sam left? When Lucifer left? Michael clearly had some inkling that the Winchesters were involved in releasing Lucifer, and any idiot could infer that Dean and Cas were the ones who freed Sam, but how much was conjecture versus knowledge?
  7. All this interesting Michael content was nearly enough to make up for all the boring Michael we got in s14. Seriously, though, it’s so nice to have a new flavor of archangel around.
  8. I liked Dean’s apology too—I liked that it wasn’t predicated on their familial connection, but rather on the acknowledgement that yeah, you left behind some serious collateral damage.
  9. Rowena and the throne—for all her claims that this is what she wanted I kinda don’t think it is. Her lifelong quests for power were all about security and control—over and over, in s10+, Rowena’s ambitions were all about seizing power so that she could protect herself. And damn if this isn’t a hefty dose of more of the same. Taking Hell’s throne was in the interest of self-preservation—it certainly wasn’t something she planned, and her only other option was suffering.
  10. Great episode for Cas. It’s really nice to see him use his status and his history.
  11. The idea to lock Chuck up as he once did to Amara is so predictable that I’m surprised it wasn’t proposed earlier. It’s not at ALL a departure from form; indeed, it follows Chuck’s scripts so perfectly that I can’t help but believe that it must be sanctioned by him.
  12. Color me preemptively Bored for the Purgatory trip. You guys think we’ll see Dean and Cas stab things in a desaturated forest??! Yawn. Next.
  13. I LOVED Sam’s general and explicit discomfort with both Michael and Adam, I love how quickly he shut down any discussion of the Cage, and I really, really want him and Adam/Michael in a room again. Also, I wonder if he’s regretting not going to Michael in s11…
Avatar
percysowner

I’m just hoping we don’t get more “Benny the BETTER brother” in the Purgatory story. A little Benny goes a long way for me, but I know others really like him, so I am expecting him to show up. I just don’t want the better brother part.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
quickreaver
Anonymous asked:

10

“Most disliked arc? Why?”This will surprise exactly no one who knows me: the beginning of Season 8: Sam hits a dog, gets a girl, doesn’t look for Dean.I’ve tried to make peace with the Sam character assassination in that arc, rewatched it, talked with trusted advisers and had a beer, but … nah. I just can’t. It was horrible storytelling. Showrunner Carver didn’t want to take a stand on why Sam did what he did. He didn’t want to stand firm on a psychotic break. He didn’t want to stand firm on “But we agreed not to look for each other.” All of it came off as half-assed and befuddled. Just because Sam opted to try college (and leave the family business) in S1 doesn’t mean that in that moment (S8), he would’ve done that again. Knowing what he knew, he didn’t even give a stinkin’ Talking Board a try?? No seance? Nothing we’ve seen in the show, to date? He just … moved to Texas and became a handyman? Really? And even though of course we had to get Sam and Dean back together, to carry on with the show, he left Amelia high and dry. Carver gets credit for co-writing Mystery Spot, but after his tenure as showrunner, I can’t help but believe he did none of the writing and just served as a SPaG/format reader for the script. Because the Sam that turned into a virtual machine to try to get Dean back in S4 looked absolutely nothing like the character who ran away and turned his back on The Job in S8. Turned his back on Kevin, too. If they’d wanted it to look like Sam had a breakdown, they showed almost none of it. He hit a dog, and we the viewer are left to wonder: was that a symptom of Sam’s mental health, or was that just a way to introduce a love interest?It was poorly executed, imho. I will die on this hill, even though I know it worked for some of my beloved fellow fans!  

Avatar
Avatar
percysowner

I could not agree more. I have read that originally the idea WAS that Sam had a nervous breakdown and Amelia may well have been an hallucination. Then, supposedly, the writers got nervous about Sam having mental health issues after he had had them in seasons six and seven, basically they felt 3 seasons of Sam being emotionally fragile would reflect badly on him. I think they were idiots, but that is what Carver went with. It’s too bad, because I think the Sam became totally broken without Dean made a lot of sense.

Avatar

MARIANNE WILLIAMSON IS EXTREMELY FUCKING DANGEROUS

You almost certainly didn’t watch this week’s Democratic presidential debates. I sure didn’t. Aside from being more than a year out from the election, they’re not helpful, because the format of these early debates is almost aggressively bad. But I have read the news coverage of the first debate, and I am extremely alarmed to see self-help evangelist Marianne Williamson getting positive responses – despite some entirely justified comparisons between her campaign and Donald Trump’s.

The actual reason Williamson feels like a Democratic Trump is that she’s a scammer who has a decades-long history of shockingly dangerous rhetoric about and exploitation of marginalized people.

Like Trump, Williamson is “skeptical” of vaccine science - that is to say, an anti-vaxxer. Unlike Trump, she is able to stick with a consistent position for more than five seconds. Williamson has a documented history of manipulating vulnerable people to reject the medical care they need in favor of her particular brand of crystal-mongering “positive thinking.” In the 1980s, she profiteered off the AIDS crisis, telling HIV+ gay men to think of the disease as their “Angels-In-Darth Vader-Suits” and promising that she could coach them to overcome it with acceptance and positive thinking. Please, please pay attention to gay men who lived through that era about how fucking monstrous this is.

She is hostile to psychiatric medicine. In practice, that mostly means she lectures people to stop taking their meds. But she, like the right-wing propagandists at InfoWars, also blames mass shootings on antidepressants. Seriously. And she sells eating disordered rhetoric dressed up as new age woo.

Naturally, she has dismissed criticism on this point as fake news.

Like Trump, she’s a talented con artist, which means that she knows how to capture voters’ attention by appropriating and regurgitating language on an issue that’s important to the party’s base. With Trump, it was his campaign promises to protect Social Security and Medicare. With Williamson, it’s her comments about reparations and racial injustice. Racial injustice is important and reparations are good. So are Social Security and Medicare. Someone who exploits people as a career is still dangerous even when they say the right things; that’s how they get in a position to exploit people. Whoever she stole her reparations commentary from was correct in their diagnosis. That doesn’t mean she cares about people of color more than any of the other marginalized groups she’s latched onto – which, incidentally, is exactly as much as Donald Trump cares about Medicare recipients.

Williamson has spent decades exploiting the predatory psychology of the “prosperity gospel,” but applied to health instead of finance: if you were pure enough of mind and heart, everything would be fine for you! Oh, things aren’t fine for you? Well, I can enlighten you, for this low, low fee! It’s Trump University, except she victimizes cancer sufferers instead of aspiring real estate agents.

Unfortunately, she is also like Trump in that the press fucking loves her and is giddily shouting over the people she endangers.

The issue here is not only that she is a bad person who should not be president, although that is obviously true and we’ve all seen how that shit can get out of hand. It’s also that just being on the stage with decent people legitimizes her. Her airy-fairy magical thinking receives praise for “recognizing the gravity of our moment” and becomes an excuse to denigrate the serious candidates who are offering compassion for people’s problems along with rationally defensible public policy ideas to solve those problems.

Her presence is distracting and cruel to important parts of the Democratic coalition. The July debates were supposed to be about health care. If disability activists, LGBTQ voters, or women who have suffered from a dangerously disordered relationship with their bodies tuned in to hear about health care, they could not avoid the painful reality that someone on that stage thinks their health care needs would disappear if only they’d think happy thoughts. And now, if they want to learn about health care policy, they have to get their information from reporters who have publicly legitimized or even praised this person.

This is unacceptable. It needs to stop now.

When she is off the stage, we will be able to have an interesting and possibly even useful conversation about the respective vulnerabilities in the progressive and conservative coalitions to toxic con artists, and the similarities and differences between the dangerous charlatans who were drawn to each party. That will only be possible AFTER she takes her toys and goes home, which in turn will only happen when she stops making the debates with even 2% in opinion polls, or when the campaign becomes a liability for her brand instead of yet another scam. Make sure people know exactly who she is – especially if they’re starting to fall for it.

Avatar
Avatar
loki-dokey

How many Supernatural fans are there on Tumblr?

You are only allowed to reblog this ONCE. Any more than once and this is completely ruined. 

Reblog if you’re a Supernatural fan so we can see how many of us there are out there!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.