Pinned
Reblogged
And for Patreon, these are the new tiers!
I noticed that people were here either for the behind the scenes and extras or commission perks, so i restructured the tiers to reflect that!
So tiers are now Donations/Coffee, Behind the scenes with everything else, and Commissioner tier!
The donation is self explanatory!
The mosh pit you get everything i make, it's a everything bagel tier with NSFW.
If i make it, it goes there.
The Front Row is the commissioner tier. Queue priority, discounts, separate forms with secret options, etc.
This tier usually pays for itself with the 10% discount! the new thing is, even with the queue closed, you can now submit, once a month, a commission request.
It'll be the first time I'll be trying this, since i can see it not working if a lot of people abuse it, but i have the best clients in the world and my output speed is quite reliable (from sending the concept sketch, the longest i took to finish a comm was 15 days?)
I think i am ready >:3c
Reblogged doubleca5t
Learning Magic the Gathering from my partner has been kinda hilarious cuz I find a lot of the cards will be either:
Treznor, the Eternal Flame: *3 paragraphs of text* -> Widely maligned, considered basically useless
Grey Rock: adds 2 mana -> $14,000 per copy, outlawed in 12 countries
Reblogged
Crop top deliciousness! Commission work for @simonbitdiddle 😌💦
#ffxiv #ff14 #FinalFantasy14 #FinalFantasyXIV
Anonymous asked:
Bruh I literally showed a friend a painting from the literal 1900s once and they accused it of being AI, literally so many people cant tell but are so smugly sure that they can and I have seen sooo many artists even without realistic artstyles be falsely accused, its infuriating
At some point people just think "if i can't do it so no other human can, therefore its AI" and honestly, this makes me want to commit acts of [redacted]
It's... Getting hard to ident AI but it STILL can be identified. Randomly accusing people of being AI is so disheartening, it pains me to see my fellow artists getting this shit.
Reblogged
Not telling y'all that you should be able to identify AI slop (but it is a valuable skill, you totes should), but if you're to be accusing artists of being AI left and right at least go and do your homework, or at least do the bare minimum and use AI identification tools like Hive Moderation, so you 1- don't ruin someone's lifehood 2- don't make a clown out of yourself maybe
Like, i get it, AI slop and "AI artists" pretending to be genuine is getting harder and harder to identify, but just accusing someone out of the blue and calling it a day doesn't make it any better.
The AI clowns shifted to styles that have less "tells" and the AI arts are becoming better. Yeah, it sucks ass.
They're also integrating them with memes, so you chuckle and share, like those knights with pink backgrounds, some cool frog and a funny one liner, so you get used to their aesthetic.
This is an art from the new coming set Final Fantasy for MtG. This is someone on Reddit accusing someone of using AI. From what i can tell, and i fucking hate AI, there is NO AI used on this image.
As far as i can tell and as far as any tool i've used, the Artist didn't use AI. which leads to the next one:
they accused the artist of this one of using Ai. the name of this artist is Nestor Ossandon.
He as already been FALSELY ACCUSED of using AI, because he drew a HAND THAT LOOKED A LITTLE WEIRD, which caused a statement from D&D Beyond, confirming that no AI has been used.
Not to repeat mysef, they're accusing the art above, that is by Nestor, to have used Ai.
REAL artists are not machines. And just like the AI slop, we are not perfect and we make mistakes. The hands we draw have wonky fingers sometimes. The folds we draw are weird. But we are REAL. We are real people. And hey, some of our "mistakes" sometimes are CHOICES. Artistic choices are a thing yo.
If you're to accuse someone of using Ai, i know it's getting hard to identify. But come on. At least do your due diligence.
Btw this is what I meant when I said the knights in pink background with one liners. Sick of this shit. All AI.
All those pixelated wizard memes are also AI
All of these are also AI generated Idfk why the wizard meme enjoyers also wanna cockslobber AI so bad but right now if you see a fucking wizard meme it's probably ai
Isn’t it weird how every situation always lapses in harrasment of artist? As if it wasn't enough getting robbed and threatened by ai anti-art , now artists have to endure be insulted and accused.
Missing clothes or any detail is not evidence of ai! Thats absurd. It means the artist forgot them or just didn't want to do it.
Modification to design is by no means sign of ai use! That's absurd. That's due to stylistic/design choices.
Strange hands or unaccurate folds/wrinkles in fabric are historically a complain of beginner artists because they're so hard to learn.
So you can't go looking for those details to try to identify ai anti-art, let alone ruin an artists based on that when all the imbeciles board the difamation train without a second thought (refer to the oldest definition of "imbecile")
Ai anti-art is evident in how stiff and synthetic (in a derogatory way) it looks, how dirty and hard the light. It indeed looks like the vomit after pixels shake that it is.
Sorry, i can't let this one pass.
This is simply not true.
We don't accidentally draw structures that fade into the crowd and bodies hat morph into other bodies. Yeah, we may portray perspective with inaccuracy either by accident or purpose but art is made with intent, and the lack of intentionality is an AI trait.
This type of behavior on structures isn't an artist accidentally making a mess. An AI doesn't know when or where a perspective ends, so it decided to end it in the middle of a crowd.
Same on those hair ornaments. It KNOWS it was supposed to be there, but it doesn't have the intentionality of knowing what they were supposed to be. So it looks like a garbled mess.
A real artist may mess up the shape of those hair ornaments, but they know what they were supposed to look like.
On this one, the hair blends into the clothes, the flower become a frill, the skirt become a piece of hair and turns asymmetrical. there is no intentionality here.
This is a level of fuck up no human artist make. Because human artists know what they're doing. They make HUMAN mistakes. This is not a HUMAN mistake.
--> I am not shaming any of you for not being able to discern Ai art from human art. This wasn't the intent of this post. <--
What I'm saying is that identifying AI slop is a good skill to have, and if you're to ACCUSE someone of being AI, you MUST know what AI art is and how to identify it.
AI slop "artists" are, and i can't stress enough, pretending to be human. They're doing all they can to pretend to be regular artists, so they can sell prints, merch, and have tables at cons, that so far don't let them.
Accusing the RIGHT AI SLOP OF BEING AI IS A GOOD THING. Accusing the wrong person will fuck their lifehood.
Stay safe and please stop putting AI slop on my dash.