Avatar

AlpakaAlex

@alpaca-clouds / alpaca-clouds.tumblr.com

trans | aro-bi | polyam | vampire brainrot | he/him

Emergency: Laptop Broke

Hey folks.

I am a thirty-something disabled trans guy from Germany currently doing my second masters degree. And I have a little problem right now.

I normally do not ask for money on my tumblr. But right now I really could use a bit of help. My laptop broke very unexpectedly, even though it was just 14 months since I bought it. And it broke in a way that it is not really fixable.

I had to buy a new laptop to be able to participate in university and stuff. While I had some money saved up, I still have to pay up with my landlord, because my former roommate refuses to pay the dept she has with the landlord. While I hope I can eventually sue for the money back... Right now I do not have it.

And I just had to spend 750 bucks on a new laptop.

So, if you have any money to spare, I would greatly appreciate it if you left some on my Ko-Fi or PayPal.

It would really be appreciated. 🙏

Thank you so much!

The Case of the Missing Boy [Neve/Bellara Mystery]

Today's story for @veilguard-appreciation-week is some very early in the "not quite relationship". I love this idea of Bellara becoming Neve's assistent as a detective.

Fandom: Dragon Age - The Veilguard Shipping: Neve/Bellara (implied) Genre: Mystery

Neve has been hired to find an elven boy, who has not come home in a while. Bellara is helping her.

A Promise to the Heathen Gods - Chapter 10

As I noted last week: Yeah... I cannot quite seem to find the natural end for this story yet, because I feel like I need to resolve more of Mizrak's issues.

A Promise to the Heathen Gods Chapter 10: Old Gods & New Religions

Fandom: Castlevania (Nocturne) Shipping: Mizrak/Olrox Genre: Hurt/Comfort

Mizrak prefers to hunt on his own, but once more he finds himself being surprised by a familiar face.

If athletes are allowed to compete, they should also be allowed to win.

Every single time I see a story where a trans athlete "blows out" the competition, their performance usually ends up not being quite as dominent as claimed.

When you look at the fastest 400m times in high school competition, it greatly adjusts the context.

In running, a second can be an eternity. Most world records are only a few tenths of a second apart. And this trans athlete is a full 7 seconds away from a record set by a cisgender high school runner.

According to the New York Post, 7 seconds is a blowout.

College runners are getting times under 50 seconds. And the world record is 47.60—a full 10 seconds faster.

This trans athlete can't help it if she is in a league with a bunch of slowpokes. She won a race. She is pretty fast in relation to her direct competition. But she is not some spectacular speed demon who will dominate women's running.

Her time wasn't even at scholarship level.

And the second place finisher wasn't even close to a "decent" time.

Also...

The vast majority of the world's top sprinters are of West African descent. Just to give you an idea of the statistics, every world record holder in the men's 100m dash since 1968 has been Black.

So they are basically cherry picking ideal circumstances to make a trans athlete look overpowered—as Portland only has a 5% Black population.

If this race happened in Atlanta instead of Portland, the trans runner probably would have won 10th place and this wouldn't be a news story.

How to create a moral panic 101.

We've got another "dominant" trans athlete going viral.

While it is true that Redmond Sullivan has had two first place finishes in tournaments since transitioning, if you look at her record, you might notice this isn't as dominant as claimed.

First I have to explain fencing ratings.

You have individual ratings A through E. The As are top fencers and Es (or unrated) fencers are the worst. The number after the rating is the year.

So a rating of A25 means you are a top level fencer in 2025.

Then you have event classes. They are also A through E but have an additional 1 through 4 difficulty variant.

The easiest tournament is E1.

It has 6 competitors and none of them have to be rated. So you are competing against poorly ranked people and have a much higher statistical chance of winning.

This is like playing basketball with all of your nerdiest friends and "accidentally" forgetting to invite Steve who is 6'4".

The hardest tournaments are A4.

This requires at least 64 competitors and must have at least 12 A-rated, 12 B-rated, and 12 C-rated fencers.

This is like being a 40 year old playing Halo against a hundred 12-year-olds all saying rude things about your mom while repeatedly headshotting you with ease.

If you look at Redmond's two first place finishes, they were in E1 and D1 competitions. (A D1 requires 15 people with four of them E-rated.)

She had a decent statistical chance of winning because the competitors were few and poorly rated.

If you look at her only A4 tournament, she placed 172nd.

I'm not sure I would call someone who placed 172nd particularly dominant.

She currently has a "D" rating overall.

When fencing in men's competitions, she was rated E. And she slightly improved to a D in women's competitions—though this is only with 3 months of data. She ended 2024 with an E rating in women's events. So maybe she improved to a D and a half.

No offense to Redmond, but she is not anywhere close to a top level fencer no matter which league she competes in.

Stephanie Turner, the kneeling transphobe, currently has an E rating and has never finished a year better than a D. By all accounts, she is evenly matched against Redmond and had a legit chance at winning the match. But it was an A2 tournament and she really had no chance of placing highly so I guess she figured this was a good opportunity to be a dipshit.

She is a coward who only took a stand when the stakes were lowest.

I'd also like to point out that Colin Rugg was quick to mention Redmond's first place finishes, but failed to mention that in the very tournament with this kneeling protest, she got 24th place.

It really seems like these trans athletes aren't trying to become dominant athletes by transitioning and they are just competing because they love it.

I mean, if I ever got 172nd place I'd probably hang up my rapier and just watch Zorro movies instead.

Media Production in a Solarpunk Future Better World

Next week I am going to talk once more about stuff outside of Solarpunk, but let me end this a bit with some more utopianism about a topic I care about a lot as some of you know. Media production. No matter the type of media. Books, movies, shows, animated, live action, audio plays, music, games.

I wish it was not news when I told people, that media production has been in trouble for a long time. People who follow one industry or another might know - but yeah. Issues are the same for the most part.

To make it short: No matter what type of media you make, you are constantly competing with a lot of other folks not just for budget, but also for the ability to publish it. Sure, some stuff can be published independently easier, but even then it is often an issue to monetize it. You can totally publish movies and shows on Youtube, yeah, but monetizing it properly is hard at times. Same goes with audio stuff. Yeah, you can put music and podcasts on a lot of platforms like Spotify - but good luck to see a dime from it. Also, if you publish it yourself, you do need to do the marketing yourself, making you very depedent on the algorithm liking you.

Sure, there is some stuff that is a bit easier to do independently. Getting a book out is fairly easy - but that makes the market also overrun with slob and makes it hard to stand out in terms of marketing. And if you are doing games... Well, Steam makes it fairly easy by now to publish indie games and monetize them, but again: Marketing is fucking hard.

And that is without getting to the other problem: You need a budget to begin with. Like, sure, this is somewhat easier with books or if you are an artist yourself comics. It will eat up your free time, but a lot of folks have written books in their free time, as most people who publish books and comics never get rich with it. Yeah, most of us writers and also the comic book artists will burn out on it, but... it is possible to do.

However, you cannot do a movie on your own. You cannot do a series on your own. No matter if it is animated or live action. You will at least need a couple of actors and a couple of people to do the technical stuff. You also need sets for life action, and licenses for animation software for animation and so on and so forth.

And yeah, sure, you can make an indie game with a fairly small team and some even managed to make games on their lonesome, but... it is hard, you might well burn out, and also: Either you have some money to do it full-time, or it will probably take you ages.

Which basically is why Kickstarter exists.

This is not just a curse that afflicts small creators - even though those tend to be affected a whole lot more - but even bigger names in each industry. Especially these days.

See, when it comes to especially movie and tv production, the tendency has been more and more to make either super cheap stuff (like game shows and such) or super expensive stuff (blockbuster) with fairly few things falling in between. Basically it tends to eb: "Go big, or go home."

And as anyone who is obsessing about any piece of media: No matter how much budget there theoretically is, there is crunch. Meaning: At some point in the production people are working 14+ hours a day seven days a week. Often towards the end of the production, when the deadline is around the corner and stuff needs to be finished, because whoever gives the money, wants to put out the finished product.

Sure, if you are indie, you technically do not have deadlines of others to meet, but chances are, that at some point there will be crunch to finish a project.

And, oh boy, once your thing gets released, it will just get even more chaotic, because we are living in an online world, where anything can happen.

Now, let me get this straight: Yes, there are people who are making media with bad intentions (just look at those Daily Wire freaks). But most of the people tend to make their media with innocent enough intentions.

Does not matter. Chances exist always that someone will feel attacked by it. Oh, you have a Black main character? Great, now the right wingers will spend hours upon hours crying about it. You have a gay character who is not nice? Well, now some radical queers will complain about it how it is bad representation (does not matter that you are gay yourself and it is kinda autobiographic). You have made an adaption? Great, someone will complain it is not close enough to whatever source material it is - not understanding that you cannot translate a piece of media into another medium without changing stuff. And so on and so forth.

Of course, some things can be viable critcisms. But in these days, chances are that you will get insulted on social media, if not hounded by death threats.

Unless of course there are people who really love your stuff, in which case you will likely experience another sort of harassment. Especially if you are an actor or a musician or someone else who puts their face out there.

I hope I do not need to continue this.

And here is the thing: Humans are evolved monkey, who mainly involved to sit around and tell stories and do art. I am not even exaggerating here. From all we know our brains did in fact evolve to do that, which is why so many people do dream of doing something in the creative industries. It is literally there in our genes.

Why did we evolve that? I don't fucking know. I guess telling stories somehow gave us an evolutionary advantage.

So, basically for the most part humanity right now can be seperated into three groups. The people who actually do not want to be creative. The people who want to be but do not get the chance and are miserable because of it. And the people who did get the chance, and are likely burning themselves out, as they do. Hooray. This is working great.

Oh, by the way, even if what you do gets somehow super successful... If you are not indie, someone else will snatch most of the money your thing did away from you. Sorry.

However, here is some facts:

  1. We absolutely do have the technology for most things that are needed to keep society running to be at least partially automated. A lot of jobs that are right now getting paid are Bullshit Jobs, that just exist to exhaust people.
  2. We also could absolutely build a system in which everyone was taken care off in terms of basic needs (housing, education, food, medicine) without needing to work. Again, we are already there.
  3. Not every movie or game or whatever needs to be high budget with amazing graphics and special effects. Yes, some people will glaim this, but in the end, storytelling is a lot more important I would argue.
  4. We absolutely could take away the control from the people who right now create artificial bottlenecks in regards to what does and does not get released.
  5. Same goes for stuff like shelf-space and concert halls, that often by now gets to be dictated by a few companies. This does not need to be that way.
  6. Also, we could greatly overhaul the copyright system, putting copyright down from up to 100 years as it is right now, to like 5 to 10 years.

If everyone's basic needs were taken care of, people could just take some time of to do their creative projects without having to burn themselves out doing basically two jobs, one of which might in fact be a bullshit job.

If we produced cheaper media, a lot mroe people would get to do it - and the conditions for it would largely improve. After all, it is the fact that a lot of stuff costs hundreds of millions that make the investors now push for specific dates. (Well, also the fact that investors tend to be shitty people, but that's a topic for another day.) It could help to reduce crunch at the very least.

If we removed the endlessness of copyright, media power would be less concentrated in a couple of companies - who mainly hold that power because of the IP they own. If the IP becomes public domain after 10 years, everyone could do fun stuff with it. And if you are opposed to this, remember: It is highly unlikely to become a millionaire with a piece of media - especially more than 10 years after the initial release. Either it takes of fairly quickly or barely at all. If it takes of initially, wonderful, you can make the money during those first few years. If it doesn't: Well it is not as if you are loosing out of much. Right now the endless copyright mostly profits big companies like Disney, Warner and so on.

Also, if movies and such were smaller, there simply would be a lot less incentive to create an outcry, because there would be more of it.

Right now (especially post-pandemic, which has harmed the media industry a lot) we get maybe 10-15 blockbuster movies a year, a handful of blockbuster TV seasons, and probably around 6-12 AAA gaming titles. So, whenever one of those comes out, the internet will talk about these, because advertisement will give you FOMO if you do not talk about it. Which obviously inspires folks to have a lot stronger opinions on everything. Which then creates the toxic online discourse. Sure, you might also get toxic online discourse over some indie stuff - because there is just indie stuff that will break containment for one reason or another. But mainly it will be stuff with a lot of money behind it. Only that of course, while officially everyone is angry then at Disney or Ubisoft or whatever, they will usually then harass the actors or some other person who was in the main creative team. (Just remember how much people bullied the Korean actress in The Last Jedi. Like, not to mention that I loved that movie, but even if you hated it and if you hated her role, it was not her fault that role existed and was written like that. Same goes for example for the guy who played Jar Jar Binks back in the day, who was nearly driven to suicide for playing a character in movie.)

Having smaller budgets also would kinda stop making some people into those big stars, who then get the whole celebrity treatment which almost certainly will be a horror for anyone's mental health - no matter in which direction it goes.

I love media. I love storytelling. I love art. But right now there is just so much going wrong, which in turn leads to heaps and heaps of abuse of workers in any of the respective industry. And I think that does not have to be that way.

Most people I know who do creative work for a living love their jobs. But they also tend to struggle a lot with some aspects of it.

I personally got the chance to visit a mid-budget Hollywood movie shoot when I was just two years out of high school, and while I wanted to do this until that point, it was a very, very crunchy shoot. People were crying. People were angry and exhausted. And I stood there: "Yeah, okay, if I ended up in this situation, I would absolutely break under the pressure." And decided to not further pursue any professional creative stuff outside of storywriting.

Still. We could so so much better.

The Etymology of Fuck

Whenever there is an adult show, game or film in which the characters cuss a lot, I see a ton of people complain about it. How it is considered "edgy". Especially if one or multiple characters use the word "fuck" to cuss. I do not get that. Because frankly, most people I know use the word a lot in English. It is just one of those words. People tend to cuss. It helps us deal with emotions.

However, then this entire thing gets stupid, when people claim that in a historical or fantasy setting, the people would not use this word. Because surely characters in the middle ages didn't. I have heard this about The Witcher and Castlevania a lot for example. But weirdly also about the Hellaverse (which is a modern fantasy setting in hell).

So, here is the thing: People since at the very least ROMAN TIMES used words for excrements and the sexual act to cuss. Most languages use words for excrements and sex and genitals to cuss, and religious blasphemy. Because cussing tends to invote societal taboos.

Now, obviously, this might not be exactly the word "fuck". But I have the feeling you would not want the Witcher or Castlevania characters to speak medieval English (or even better: the respective medieval languages of their setting - so Polish and Romanesque). Would make it harder to understand. But believe you me... Those languages had obscene cusses that referenced the act of having sexual intercourse.

And just for reference: The "fuck" as a cuss with exact this meaning goes still back in English until at the very least the early 16th century. We have a written document from the time, which Trevor Belmont certainly would find sympathetic, as someone is cussing out the Catholic church in this one.

So yes. This is 100% historically accurate. *drops mic*

matt just fired half the remaining tumblr support staff lmao

from my sources adjacent to tumblr--from which i can spread rumors and insider information freely because i dont give a fuck about ever working in the tech sector--im hearing this round of firings was focused on purging the senior staff, and not just from support but from the entire remaining tumblr workforce. i'm hearing there are about 25 people left.

If this is truly the beginning of the end, it's been an honour 🫡

Fuck this. This is like the only hellsite on the internet that is still somewhat fun.

Can't we just... throw together and buy tumblr? I mean, last time it was sold it was sold for 3 million - and if they are no longer supporting it, it can't have gained in worth. I mean, we should be able to raise 1 million, right? That is actually not that much.

I am replaying Veilguard for the first time right now. I still have not decided who to romance. Taash or Emmrich? The original plan was Emmrich, but I like the dynamic this Rook has with Taash.

But also: Why are people angry with this Rook for making the Minrathous/Treviso decision

With my first Rook it made sense. He was a Shadow Dragon and was born and raised in Minrathous. OBVIOUSLY people expected him to go to Minrathous and when he didn't, they felt betrayed.

This Rook however is a Veil Jumper. He went to Minrathous (so I could see that scenario too) and now the Crows are pissed. The Crows. WITH WHOM HE INTERACTED ONCE SO FAR. Why? Why would they expect this random elven kid they had met once to show up for them? lol

Fashion and Power; Hair and Identity: An Analysis of Olrox in Castlevania Nocturne

So. I've been thinking a lot lately about Olrox's design and how he dresses.

Like we have Drolta who is serving cunt in a totally different, usually wildly anachronistic, outfit every other scene... And we have Alucard still wearing the same tattered, moth-eaten overcoat he was sporting 300 years ago...

And then we have Olrox, whose outfit is very much in keeping with the style we see worn by our model french nobleman, the Marquis:

You can see the similarities between their looks: the stockings and shoes, the cravat, the tall collar, the pleats, the contrasting trims and accents, the highlights that suggest the fabric has a silken/satin sheen.

...But for his first appearance in Boston, he's wearing something similar—but not so flashy. Which makes sense, because a lot of the above details would be too ostentatious for colonial sensibilities and just not as accessible there. His Boston look is very clearly in the same style as Julia's outfit:

The boots with the dramatic cuffs, the wide lapels, the longer coat, the way the trims and accents are much more subtle, and the lack of that satin sheen we see in the French outfits.

I point this stuff out because it tells us that not only does Olrox dress well, but he dresses according to what is in fashion around him. He's not like Drolta, expressing himself by wearing whatever the fuck he wants—nor is he like Alucard, still dressing the way a past version of himself once did, existing sort of outside of time. That Olrox has two subtly different outfits in the span of ten years seems to indicate that this is a man who speaks the language of fashion, who understands the role it plays in society, and how it is used to assert power for oneself in the right contexts.

You should write the most niche, indulgent fiction that appeals to you specifically, because it will be much more artistically authentic and valuable than corporate slop that has been focus tested to death to appeal to the widest audience possible.

Write for yourself and you will always be making authentic art that has an uncompromised vision, and you will gain an audience that appreciates that.

People need to start doing this with movies again

There is just a little problem with this: You cannot make movies without a budget. And these days nobody is gonna give you a budget for a niche, self-indulgent project, because all the big investors want is action blockbusters. You might get someone on board with some Oscar bait - preferably if you are a known director. But that's it, pretty much.

That is why the most creative movies right now tend to be horror. Because horror movies cost way, way less. (You can make a good horror movie for 1-5 million - everything else tends to start at 30 million up. Mainly because horror fans also tend to be a lot more forgiving when it comes to bad special effects.)

Evil is what Evil does [Lucanis/Rook - Action & Hurt No Comfort]

Today I have a new story for @veilguard-appreciation-week is there. Determination is not only what Spite once was, but it also is definitely the strongest trait of my Rook Thel. However, this story... goes a bit dark.

Fandom: Dragon Age - The Veilguard Shipping: Lucanis/Rook Genre: Action & Hurt No Comfort

Lucanis has a good idea why Thel has asked him towards the Tevintan countryside: someone needs to die. But neither Lucanis, nor Spite could guess that the target in question is a relative of Thel's.

Doing Science in a Solarpunk Future

Yesterday I talked a bit about the ethics of animal testing (just to reiterate: Yes, if it is for medical use, I think it just cannot be circumvented, unless you want people to die of all sorts of preventable and treatable issues). But today I want to talk about science in broader way - and what is going wrong in it right now.

Everyone who follows me who themseves is working in academia knows this, but a lot of other people don't: science is having quite a lot of issues right now. Has been having them for years and years for that matter.

Depending on the country you live in, there are a couple of different approaches to doing science. The most traditional one is obviously doing it at an university or a similar institute for science and learning. However, you can also do science for companies, and you obviously can do science under government contracts (which usually is a nice way of saying: You are doing science for military use). Mind you, university science in some countries get treated as government work - at least if it is a public university. Germany, where I live, thankfully has a provision in our laws about this (basically, the military cannot use any scientific things unless the scientist explicitly allows for it), but other countries don't.

Which brings me to the general problem. You might have heard of it: Science is kinda underfunded. Because for years and years the governments generally have reduced the budgets of universities. This hits the humanities even harder, but the MINT faculties also tend to be hit with budget cuts every so often - while the same time more and more stuff needs to be done by more bureaucratic means. As David Graeber writes in his book Bullshit Jobs: Scientists and teachers are forced to become more and more "box tickers" (so people who do government assigned documentation work, not because it is acutlaly needed, but because it is ordered).

And while we are on it: If you have not tenure (meaning: if you are not a professor), you will be paid shit either way. Which kinda sucks, because it makes fucking as hell sure that only people from rich families - or who have a rich spouse - can afford to do this.

Just as an example: I will start working for my university in a couple months. How ever, the university uses the same contracts for everyone. And those have not changed in a couple of years. Inflation happened. Right now doing the job parttime will not allow me to make enough money to pay for my bare necessities. It will not be enough to pay rent, insurance, and food. Because it is just so low. (About 950€ a month.) This works for folks who have other means of money or family who pays for stuff - but not for an orphan like me.

And while I obviously will start as "student assistent", even other folks - like PhD candidates and stuff - will get paid fairly poorly for the work they do and how important that work is to keep the university running.

Even once you have your masters or even your PhD. If you do not have tenure, universities will pay you worth - especially in MINT - than any other job you could take with that degree. Basically, they are building on the entire idea that the honor of doing science is enough payment. Just that honor does not pay bills.

But lets talk about science itself. Though the problem kinda is still the same: money and bureacracy.

I am not going to argue, that there should be some hurdles for science to make sure that the sciene done ideally is ethical and such. Absolutely. No argument from me. However, right now there is a ton of unnecessary hurdles to try and do a project. And often enough, even if you are at a university, the budget the university has for a single project, will not be enough to pay the scientists and their assistants and whatever material might be needed for it. So a lot of scientists will have to ask at other places for funding. At times you can get funds from groups that just help science for science's sake - but often this means either companies (who will then make money with anything you come up with) or government (who, if your country allows for it, might use anything in the military).

Which also brings us to the problems between MINT and humanities. While this is from Utah, there was this wonderful poster, that I feel sums it up really well:

Mind you, from my experience so far, there are quite a lot of scientists, who would like to have someone from humanities on certain projects. But those are usually not within the budget. And while all in all a lot of folks in science are screaming for more interdisciplinary research... Getting the university to finance that is often a fucking nightmare. Partly, because the different faculties basically get budgeted differently. So if you work together with 5 faculties, how might they ever budget that?

Of course, if you get to do research these days also will largely depend on three things:

  1. Are you already a very well known scientist in your field, who might even have won some accolades? Great, you might go ahead with your project.
  2. Otherwise: Will there be a way to monetize this science later on? If so, well, we will certainly find some way to do this.
  3. Finally: Will it be something super prestigeous which will enhance the name of the university and get you published in one of those very fancy science journals? If so: Amazing, this will work too. But don't you dare to find out that the thing you theorized does not work. Journals do not like "we tried this, and it did not work, because..." papers.

I think you can see the issues coming up, here, right?

In recent years there are again and again scandals of "scientist X faked their results" or "actually everyone at university Y faked their results". And this tends to be bound to the last point.

See, right now, if you get to keep your academic job is largely dependend on whether you publish a lot of papers - ideally in some well known magazine. If you are in natural science, you totally want to get something published in NATURE or SCIENCE. And if you do medicine, you should at some point publish something in the New England Journal of Medicine. You know, to enhance the reputation of the university, who kindly is paying you a bad salary (as long as you do not have tenure).

To make simple: this does not work, and it creates the wrong incentives.

Mind you, most people who are in science right now do indeed do what they do, because they want to do something for science and humanity. They love what they do.

But of course it does not need to be that way.

Which is where we get to the Solarpunk aspect of this all. Because yeah, it is easy to imagine how it could work a whole lot better.

Technically this would already start if we just had a system that took care of everyone's basic needs and a bit extra. Be it because we had communism, or because we had something like UBI. (Reminder: Yes, I am a communist, but I will take UBI over nothing, thank you very much.) In this case, at least the problem of scientists not making enough money to take care of their family would just go away. Because the families would be taken care of.

We also need just more options with folks from different disciplines to work together. We know for a fact, that the best results will happen, if diverse disciplines cooperate, because it creates a mix of ideas that will work a whole lot better for everyone, than just the same nerds with the same focus sitting together.

But of course: While man-hours are the biggest money-sink in a lot of research, we also need a better way to finance equipment. Both those kinda of equipment we already technically have as a society - and those that people want to get to work (I don't know, stuff like CERN, which was obviously a massively expensive project to be built). Because those projects might be needed to push science ahead.

Most people who work at universities indeed do it right now, beause they care about whatever they do. (Let's face it, a lot of folks are undiagnosed in terms of one flavor of one neurodivergency or another.) But this should not mean that they have to do the work in a way that endangers them in terms of allowing their families to thrive or basically forbid them of taking care of their pensions.

And of course... the bureaucracy. It needs to go. Do not make researchers fill out weekly forms for some bullshit that nobody will look at at any point.

I think we could be a lot further in certain areas of research. This goes for humanities either way (the stuff we could have found and researched in history - if you guys only knew how MANY UNTRANSLATED MANUSCRIPTS THERE ARE), but it goes for science, too. Chances are, we could have come with certain solutions to serve environmentalism and such, if folks could just do the research they actually wanted.

Anonymous asked:

Could i please get a small mammal cursed bio fact if u have one

the grasshopper mouse of the southwestern United States looks like a standard house mouse but is almost entirely carnivorous and is known to kill and consume everything from less homicidal mice to goddamn rattlesnakes, which they kill by jumping onto the snake’s back and gnawing through its spine

Avatar

behold…. a Bastard

How could U fail to mention that this fool marks territory by howling? Yunno. Like a wolf

Oh. Oh I am in love with this bastard wolf mouse.

Hat tip @lookadreygon this is actually my third child (Mouse’s) daemon I think 🤔

I needed to google it. So, here you go. The Howling Mouse.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.