Avatar

Her Satanic Majesty

@semperty / semperty.tumblr.com

I'm only here to be salty over Daenerys Targaryen
Avatar

No but this idea that Dany has to learn that politics is complicated is so funny. The girl is born in Westeros but grew up in Essos, traveled through the Free Cities, is sold to the Dothraki and becomes an independent Khaleesi, survives the Red Waste, travels to Qarth, and conquers Slaver’s Bay. The cultural richness of her identity alone confers much substantive political nuance to her character. On top of that, you’d have to be very stupid to think that ruling Meereen, a city-state with a slavery based mode of production built on the vestiges of an ancient empire, with a nobility from the slaver class and an underbelly of thousands of colonized slaves and smallfolk taken from all across the continent, isn’t complex. Meereen, with its thousands of people, and the 80,000 freedmen who follow Dany to meereen. So essentially Dany is ruling nearly 100,000 people at the moment. Doesn’t exactly get more complex than that.

Avatar

Fuck this misogynistic fandom

This is actually insane of them to say considering that they are literally regurgitating what slaveowners in Essos say about her:

"Sweet?" Qavo laughed. "If even half the stories coming back from Slaver's Bay are true, this child is a monster. They say that she is bloodthirsty, that those who speak against her are impaled on spikes to die lingering deaths. They say she is a sorceress who feeds her dragons on the flesh of newborn babes, an oathbreaker who mocks the gods, breaks truces, threatens envoys, and turns on those who have served her loyally. They say her lust cannot be sated, that she mates with men, women, eunuchs, even dogs and children, and woe betide the lover who fails to satisfy her. She gives her body to men to take their souls in thrall." (ADWD Tyrion VI) 
-
Wed her or fight her; either way, I will face her soon. The more Quentyn heard of Daenerys Targaryen, the more he feared that meeting. The Yunkai'i claimed that she fed her dragons on human flesh and bathed in the blood of virgins to keep her skin smooth and supple. Beans laughed at that but relished the tales of the silver queen's promiscuity. "One of her captains comes of a line where the men have foot-long members," he told them, "but even he's not big enough for her. She rode with the Dothraki and grew accustomed to being fucked by stallions, so now no man can fill her." And Books, the clever Volantene swordsman who always seemed to have his nose poked in some crumbly scroll, thought the dragon queen both murderous and mad. "Her khal killed her brother to make her queen. Then she killed her khal to make herself khaleesi. She practices blood sacrifice, lies as easily as she breathes, turns against her own on a whim. She's broken truces, tortured envoys … her father was mad too. It runs in the blood." (ADWD The Windblown) 

Dany antis often do replicate, word for word, what the slavers who fight her say, but it’s jarring to see it happen so openly! 

The idea that Dany’s “internal sense” is thrown off because men sexualize her and objectify her and try to rape or brutalize her is victim-blaming her for the actions of men. It’s also reifying the trope of the “seductress/enchantress” femme fatale who lures men into her grasp, the trope that the very slavers invoke in their rumors about her. She is a teenage girl who has been exploited her entire life. How is it her fault that grown men are predatory toward her? 

Not to put too fine a point on this but grown men are predatory toward other girls and women in the series too. Sansa is an obvious example, but so is Margaery. Her family schemes to marry her off three times. Arianne is also sexualized by multiple men around her, and her father made her feel like all she’d be good for is being a consort to some lord. Arya faces rampant threats of sexual violence throughout her time in the Riverlands and Harrenhal. For all that men are horrific toward Brienne for her gender non-conformity, men try to rape and exploit her too. Cersei is another obvious example, treated as a pawn and object by all the men around her, even when she’s Queen Regent. The way people talk about Melisandre and her “undue influence” on Stannis is yet another example. 

Every female viewpoint character has to deal with entitled men trying to prey on them. And it’s not just the female viewpoints––it’s multiple girls and women in the series who deal with male predation and entitlement. 

George is depicting patriarchy in its ugliest and most clear form. While he has been critiqued for going overboard, and perhaps there isn’t a clear historical consensus on just how downtrodden women in feudal medieval Europe were, patriarchy is, and was, a fact of life. A lot of what he depicts is accurate to the behavior of men. 

What guts me, though, is that this demonstrates two running trends in the ASOIAF fandom with respect to Dany: first is of course the violent misogyny, the victim-blaming and slut-shaming, the scapegoating of Dany for how men treat her, but second is how people isolate Dany from the themes and tropes of the story. This redditor is acting like Dany is in a unique position of being exploited by men, when, as I demonstrated above, ALL of the female viewpoint characters are preyed upon by men, and MOST non-pov female characters in the series are as well. They have to isolate her like this to make a misogynistic, bioessentialist argument about how her trauma will lead to her going mad. That requires them blatantly ignoring that she is one of dozens of female characters in the series who deals with similar treatment from men. 

It’s also blatantly false, because Dany calls out the men around her. From her very first viewpoint chapter, she’s suspicious of Illyrio and refuses to trust him. She stands up to her brother Viserys and later recognizes that he abused and sold her to Drogo. She explicitly calls Jorah out for trying to groom her and sends him out of her service when she finds out about his betrayal. She knows that both Daario and Hizdahr take advantage of her in their own ways, even though she loves Daario and marries Hizdahr to bring peace to her city. She fights back when Prendahl na Ghezn calls her misogynistic insults. She takes advantage of men’s misogyny by deceiving them (Kraznys) or using it to negotiate strategies (as she often does in her military and political councils). She is one of the most lucid viewpoints when it comes to recognizing patriarchy and male entitlement, and there is no indication that she’s been “befuddled” into thinking that the world will “worship her” because men sexualize her. 

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
llutik

“He told me the moon was an egg, Khaleesi,’ the Lysene girl said. ‘Once there were two moons in the sky, but one wandered too close to the sun and cracked from the heat. A thousand thousand dragons poured forth, and drank the fire of the sun. That is why dragons breathe flame. One day the older moon will kiss the sun too, and then it will crack and the dragons will return.”

Avatar

There was this thread on r/asoiaf the other day that was complaining about how ASOIAF stans seem to lose all creativity when it comes to theorizing about Dany’s endgame. The OP argued that people are so sure that Dany’s story can only end in death even though nothing is set in stone and the story would still be very good if she lived to the end.

Predictably, the comments in the thread proceeded to double down on why Dany is 100% “doomed” and marked for death, which is very funny because not only did they completely miss OP’s point, but they started citing statistics that I have personally never heard of. How can anyone except George R.R Martin know what is 100% Dany’s endgame? Are there some mathematic equations I need to be aware of? Can someone share with the class please…

See, I agree with that OP big time. It’s a bit annoying to go through fandom spaces and have to see the same old posts about how Dany is an instrument of death and so she needs to be put out at the end of the story. Others will try to argue that she will die a hero as a means of being a bit more charitable. It seems that everywhere I go, Dany’s endgame always ends in death. There really is an obvious lack of creativity when it comes to speculating about her endgame.

I have an issue with using death to define Dany’s story because she is so much more than that. People get so caught up in the “bride of fire” and “daughter of death” aspects that they forget about what Dany actually does. She goes around liberating people! Yes she brings death…to those who harm others and deserve it. She is not bringing death wholesale to innocent people but she is bringing death and destruction to corrupt institutions. That’s the whole point of her character. She is a liberator. She is a savior! She is a dragon and the dragon cleanses. To the slaves she is the Breaker of Chains. To those who have glimpsed of the coming Long Night, she is the Prince(ss) That Was Promised. To all, she represents hope for the future. Hope for life and liberation from death.

Dany gained so much power throughout her arc so far and she could have taken a ship straight to Westeros, but she used her new found abilities to free people from slavery; she chose to liberate them from death. Really, that’s how I view Dany’s campaign against slavery. Slaves aren’t treated as people; their humanity is discarded, they have no will, no future, no hope. It’s almost like a death of the person though they may not physically be dead. Then in comes Daenerys Targaryen, a young girl with nothing but her dragons and her compassion, who says to them “you may not matter to them but you matter to me and I will save you”. Where the slaves didn’t have free will before, Dany gives it to them. I’m remembering the unsullied who didn’t even have names but Dany gave them the ability to pick and choose their own; which seems like such a small act but means so much more because names are important in humanizing people. She represents new beginnings.

Dany’s crusade across Slaver’s Bay is a big deal. She didn’t have to do it but she did it anyway. There was no personal gain for her but she did it because she cares so deeply about people. And then she gets to Meereen and decides to stay there because her “children” need her. She cannot and will not abandon strangers to a fate of death. And the people know that.

I’m just thinking of this quote:

“I am no lady,” the widow replied, “just Vogarro’s whore. You want to be gone from here before the tigers come. Should you reach your queen, give her a message from the slaves of Old Volantis.” She touched the faded scar upon her wrinkled cheek, where her tears had been cut away. “Tell her we are waiting. Tell her to come soon.”

- Tyrion VII, ADWD

And this one too:

“I told you, I know our little queen […] this Mother of Dragons, this Breaker of Chains, is above all a rescuer. The girl who drowned the slaver cities in blood rather than leave strangers to their chains can scarcely abandon her own brother’s son in his hour of peril.”

- Tyrion VI, ADWD

These people have never even met Dany but to them, she is hope and freedom and life! She is salvation, and that’s the point. She has spent much of her arc fighting slavery which is in preparation for her ultimate destiny as a savior to defeat the Others. Because they not only bring death to the land but they also threaten to enslave humanity through death. However, they cannot triumph over the Breaker of Chains; the great savior that is Daenerys Targaryen! That’s what her story has been building up to. And it’s not that Dany is saving people and peacing out (e.g., dying in a sacrifice). The point is that she herself persevered. And because she persevered, her people will too. It’s that her constant survival ensures that of others.

Dany grew up penniless, homeless, hungry, and even started out as a 13 year old slave to Khal Drogo. She could have given up but she didn’t because through everything, she is resilient. She is determination and perseverance in the face of death. When she walked into that funeral pyre she could have died, but she lived and emerged as the Mother of Dragons - these dragons that have been instrumental in freeing slaves and will ultimately be important in the Other’s defeat. She “died” in that pyre and was “reborn”, and this rebirth is moving her closer to ensuring that the rest of her people overcome death as well.

That’s why it’s more thematically meaningful for Dany to survive the Long Night, in my opinion. She, more than anyone, represents what it means to constantly fight against the odds. She represents what it means to go through all the worst life can throw at you and then not only come out on top, but turn around and use her own survival to ensure that of others’. She has lived through so many trials and persevered; she is the very embodiment of what it means to survive. Because her survival means that where death could destroy, it didn’t. Instead, life prevailed.

If she survives the Long Night, she remains a constant symbol - a beacon if you will - of what’s to come which is better days. Those who are suffering can look to her and see how she went through hell and lived. This would go a long way in boosting morale especially in the aftermath of the Long Night. Because think about it, the people fought against the Others and overcame death, but now they have to survive what comes next. I think Dany is needed because she has already gone through this cycle and will not only be an important figurehead during the War for the Dawn, but she will also be important as the people try to find a will to live beyond death (winter and the Others).

The last book is called A Dream of Spring so I assume this means that it will still be winter - though the Long Night may be over. People will still be hungry, they will be homeless, and they will be tired. They will not know what comes next only that they have to move forward and survive through this new hardship. And you know who has personally experienced these things and knows what it’s like? Daenerys Targaryen! She has survived through it all. So imagine just how powerful it will be for those who survive the Long Night to look at young Daenerys and go, “you know what, I think we’ll get through this one too”. And it will be even more poignant for Dany to lead them to that rest and restoration. Because it’s not just the people who need rest after fighting for so long, Dany does too:

“It is such a long way,” she complained. “I was tired, Jorah. I was weary of war. I wanted to rest, to laugh, to plant trees and see them grow. I am only a young girl.”

- Dany X, ADWD

People take the “dragons plant no trees” part that comes after to assume that Dany will remain stagnant for the next two books and it really is a pity. Someone pointed out a while ago (and I cannot for the life of me remember who this was) that Dany tends to pivot at the end of each book. As she continues to grow and develop as a character, her plans and priorities change. So it’s a bit sad how people assume that she will constantly be in a state of warfare. Because at the moment, Dany’s didn’t isn’t over yet.

Her campaign in Essos must continue and she still has the Others to fight in Westeros. So for now, she cannot truly settle down to plant trees. But she has been learning! She tried to do that throughout ADWD and I don’t see why that learning arc will be discarded at the end of the story. Especially when we consider that few others have actually been learning to lead. The only other character who has is Jon Snow but funny enough, many in this fandom think that he too is doomed to die. I’m not sure why George R.R Martin would kill the two up-and-coming leaders in the story who best answer “what was Aragorn’s tax policy?”

Ultimately, when all is said and done and there are no more wars to fight, I think Dany will finally find her peace and will learn that dragons can plant trees and watch them grow. As all the other heroes in the story, she will probably come out of the Long Night battered and bruised, but everything will be okay because she will still be alive; just like that Bran scene at the end of ACOK, which to me is the very definition of bittersweet. A better ending for her in my opinion isn’t dying in the cold of winter, but rather living and healing and finding a way to build a house with a red door, even though she cannot return to the one she knew as a child. Not only that, she can also provide this house with a red door” for the homeless, beaten, and bruised who survive the Long Night. It’s certainly possible that Martin could write Dany’s death in a way that is poignant and beautiful, but my personal preference is that she lives because of what her survival means for the larger themes in the story.

This whole post has been so jumbled and I’ve rambled a bit but I hope it made sense in the end lol. But anyway….the point is, I’m 1000% Team Dany Must Live!

Avatar
reblogged

A while back, when House of the Dragon came out and people realized that Dany’s theme was playing every time they were talking about the prince that was promised, many people tried to claim that it wasn’t Dany’s theme, it was a Targaryen/dragons theme. So I’ve been wanting for some time to write about where exactly the “Prince that was promised” theme comes from, and prove that it comes from a Dany theme, not a theme about the Targaryens in general or about the dragons.

To begin, let’s clarify which is the dragons/Targaryen theme: it’s the theme “Mother of Dragons”. More especifically, it’s the famous “aa-AAAAHH” that appears almost every time we see the dragons (there’s also a version of the aa-AAAH that can be heard very softly every time the dragon eggs appear). You can listen to it from 0:00 to 0:40 in the following video:

Meanwhile, Dany’s theme is “Love in the Eyes”. There are several little parts in the theme that develop into other themes throughout the show, all about Dany. One of the themes that was derived from Love in the Eyes is the theme “Breaker of Chains”. I’ve been listening to Dany’s theme “Love in the Eyes” to find out exactly which part of it Breaker of Chains comes from, and I’m pretty sure I found it.

The part of Love in the Eyes that originates the theme Breaker of Chains is the part from 1:00 to 1:20. Specifically, the wind instrument that is playing (there are also percussion and strings playing, but the part that originates the “Breaker of Chains” theme is the part of the wind instrument). Listen to “Love in the Eyes” from 1:00 to 1:20, and then listen to Breaker of Chains from 1:42 to 2:35.

As you can see, the theme “Breaker of Chains” comes from that specific part of “Love in the Eyes”. And given that it comes from “Love in the eyes”, this means that “Breaker of Chains” is indeed a theme specific to Dany, not a dragon/Targaryen theme.

Now watch the clips where they talk about Aegon’s dream in House of the Dragon: the scene where Viserys talks about Aegon’s dream, and the scene where Rhaenyra reads the dagger with the prince that was promised prophecy.

In both scenes, the theme playing is “Breaker of Chains”, which is distinct from the theme of the dragons. The theme of the dragons does play together with the “Breaker of Chains” theme in the first scene, but in the second scene, when Rhaenyra reads the dagger (“from my blood come the prince that was promised and his will be the song of ice and fire”), only Dany’s theme “Breaker of Chains” plays.

To me, this makes it very clear that the music of both scenes is referring to Dany, not just the Targaryens or the Dragons in general, because it’s not just a general dragon/Targaryen theme that plays, it also plays a theme that is specific to Dany, “Breaker of Chains”, that comes from “Love in the Eyes”.

Avatar

Happiness Will Come To You.

when tho

When You Least Expect It. Probably Late March

Avatar
wizardshark

reblog for happiness to come for you in late march!

Avatar
zac--efren

I reblogged this last year and I hung out with blink-182 backstage on March 30. Reblogging again because it worked the first time.

Avatar
scientiablr

honestly, last year one of the best days of my life happened in late March

Avatar
Avatar
finitefall
Anonymous asked:

I do think a lot of Alicent's fans do have trauma fetish and love seeing white women portrayed as willowy victims who can't make one good decision because they're buried under the weight of patriarchy while overlooking their actions that uphold said patriarchy. We are conditioned to believe that a white, traditionally feminine, upper-class woman’s trauma is more relatable, more saddening, and more palatable than anyone else’s. Alicent’s fans often talk about her as if she’s the most tragic character in the series, or the one who’s suffered the most and thus cannot be critically analyzed, because if you were to do so it would be like kicking a hummingbird or puppy. The very fact is, though, that her fans assign her qualities of “softness” and “sadness” and “purity” and “infallibility” that they don’t assign to any of the other female characters. We know that Cersei, Daenerys, Arya, and many other female characters go through equally horrifying things. So what makes Alicent “soft, pure, the true underdog, the true compassionate person” when contrasted against Daenerys or Arya ? Is there any good or rational reason that Alicent is the female character we’re supposed to feel saddest for according to her fans, or the character who is viewed as “the saddest” and “the purest” and “the softest” ? No, there really isn’t. It’s simply because of misogyny and how Alicent embodies white and passive feudalist womanhood.

You know nonnie, I absolutely agree with you. We saw it with Sansa, and now we see it with Alicent. While there are exceptions, most Sansa stans are now Alicent stans for a reason. What's tragic is that our criticism of Alicent is called by her stans white feminism misogyny, which is also ironic. There have been posts written by other, more insightful people than me about Sansa and white feminism: Sansa as the embodiment of white femininity and white feminism by @brideoffires and Sansa Stark, the benevolent white woman fantasy by @masterthespianduchovny are two of them. Show!Alicent is similar in a lot of ways: pretty, pure, soft suffering. I'm not talking too much about it myself since a) I'm white myself and I’m sure people are gonna ask me what makes me different and b) BIPOC women have more insight than I do and are the ones we should listen to when it comes to this.

Avatar
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

it’s so funny how they claim dany can’t be a true revolutionary because she’s a monarch, while stanning the starks and acting like they have a “benevolent monarchy” or something. the reality is that dany does more than any other character to overthrow the violent status quo than anyone else in asoiaf (and more than 99.9% of people in our world to). like the real reason they prefer the starks to the targaryen’s is because the starks are the embodiment of the status quo.

what's even funnier is that they cry and throw up about 'targ imperialism' but don't care that starks kept their rule of the north for thousands of years because they used violence to subjugate all other houses (and genocide children of the forest and settler colonized their land, but that's of course is never mentioned); all that just because aegon's conquest was in a more recent memory i guess. if your imperialism happened 500 years ago instead of 300, that's fine i suppose.

these bozos think that just because the nobles of the north hate the boltons and want to reinstall the starks (and part of those hatred is because most of them lost relatives or friends during the red wedding), that means that everyone in westeros loves the starks, the starks should just be granted independence on a whim because they 'deserved it' for being so nice and smallfolk of the north also want the starks to return. in reality, they don't give a shit because normal people don't care about who rules them as long as they are left alone. regular people might've liked ned but he is dead now and mostly they just want to live their lives.

this is funny because they for real think that as long as the nobles are nice to the smallfolk, they are fine and it doesn't matter they're feudal lords. except for when their last name is targaryen, in that case every good deed for the smallfolk is irrelevant (like jaehaerys giving the realm 60 years of peace and prosperity, alysanne providing clear water for the citizens of kings landing, aegon v giving smallfolk rights, aegon iii doing his best to keep the peace and fix the realm's problems while being terribly traumatized his entire life etc) while every war means they're the worst ever and all of that is irrelevant. even though we see the full extent of the power struggle between the five kings of the realm and we know that before the targaryens wars were even more common.

let us also not forget that in the show, daenerys not only wished to end slavery and reclaim the iron throne, she specifically said she wants to 'destroy the wheel', aka the feudal system itself. and that's somehow wrong too because revolutionary violence bad

Avatar
Avatar

Sansa Stark feeds her abuser to the hounds, it’s revenge.

Daenerys watches her abusive brother die, it’s madness.

Arya Stark bakes the Freys sons and feeds them to their father for their betrayal, it’s justice and revenge.

Daenerys executes the Tarlys for their betrayal, it’s madness.

Jon Snow executes the men who killed him including a child, it’s justice.

Daenerys burns the Khals who wanted to rape her, it’s madness.

Ned Stark wants to execute Jorah, a slaver, it’s the law.

Daenerys executes slavers, it’s madness.

Tyrion Lannister roasts thousands alive with wildfire, it’s war.

Daenerys burns thousands alive with dragonfire, it’s madness.

Every character has the privilege of having their actions justified because of trauma, abuse, age, revenge, law and justice EXCEPT DAENERYS TARGARYEN.

Avatar
Avatar
lov3bone

This is money cat. He only appears every 1,383,986,917,198,001 posts. If you repost this in 30 seconds he will bring u good wealth and fortune.

Avatar
reblogged

The reason people want Dany to go mad is that she has the resources to solve everyone’s problems but she’s also an obstacle for a lot of the fandoms preferred endgames for their favs. Having her be a crazy evil tyrant lady is a convenient way to get her out of the way so that other characters can use her resources and still get their happy ending.

That’s why there are so many theories that involve other characters (usually the favorite characters of whoever made the theory) taking control of her dragons, and that’s why the show put the main conflict (the war against the WW) as a secondary conflict to the war over the iron throne. Use dany and her resources and then put her down like a mad dog so that the rest can get a happy-ish ending.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.