This is conceived as an informal and spontaneous annex to my more extensive blog, Grand Strategy: The View from Oregon.

Subscribe to the Grand Strategy Newsletter for regular updates on work in progress.

Discord Invitation

26th April 2017

Post with 1 note

Two Forms of Technological Soteriology

image

Recently in Easter and the Brotherhood of Mankind I discussed the close coupling of eschatology and soteriology in the western tradition. This is something that I have been meaning to address for a long time, but I haven’t had the words for it as yet. (The words are still inadequate, but I hope the idea came through nevertheless.) In the course of this exposition I noted that science presents us with a grand cosmological eschatology, but no associated soteriology. I received a comment on that post from Gregor L. Hartmann, who rightly pointed out that transhumanist hopes for a life everlasting (albeit technologically embodied) constitutes a technological soteriology.

In another essay, Technologies of Life Extension, I reviewed a range of different possibilities open to the transhumanist for life extension, which implies that transhumanism is not one, but many. And, even beyond the many different possible forms of life extension, there are many different possible forms of life enhancement (something I touched upon in Transhumanism and Adaptive Radiation). So I’ve thought a lot about how transhumanism could transform the life of the individual ways, but I had initially failed to see this as a form of soteriology consistent with and predicated upon scientific civilization and a scientific conception of the cosmos.

Now another form of technological soteriology has occurred to me, perhaps as obvious as the example of transhumanism, and that is simply for the individual to identify himself or herself with the project of elaborating the scientific conception of the cosmos. This can take a form as adventurous as becoming an astronaut and exploring new worlds, or a form as intellectual as continuing to elaborate the scientific vision of the cosmos and the place of human beings within it. In other words, there are many forms of technological soteriology even within the idea of identifying oneself with cosmological eschatology.

Since the project of science is essentially infinitistic, the soteriology of coupling one’s life, or the life of one’s species, to the scientific project, is also infinitistic. This observation brings out a contrast that hadn’t previously thought of: perfections are usually conceived as finite goods, and the role of the idea of perfection in traditional soteriologies is prominent (and has a political parallel in Comte de Maistre). While perfection may be a distant goal, if an individual attains perfection, they have arrived at their destination, and there is nothing further than remains except to continue to exist in this unchanging perfection (which would be one way to describe eternity in heaven).

The soteriology of identification with cosmological eschatology admits of no unchanging perfection. Scientific exploration and discovery can continue without end, as can the elaboration of scientific knowledge based upon this exploration and discovery. This infinitistic ideal possibly differentiates technological soteriology from its finitistic alternatives more definitively than only ontological commitments of the finitistic or infinitistic worldviews. 

Another point: the soteriology of identification with cosmological eschatology is equally valid for the individual or for the species, so that this soteriology can offer the same hope to both the individual seeking to identify with the scientific project and an entire species that seeks to identify with the scientific project. That hope is the possibility of making a real contribution to the scientific enterprise, and so securing a permanent legacy for oneself or one’s species. Also, this soteriological conception is not limited to the contributions of a single species or a single kind of conscious: even an artificial consciousness could contribute meaningfully to the scientific project, and so receive in turn the meaning that derives from participation in a great enterprise that transcends not only the individual, but also possibly transcends a civilization and even a species.

There is, then, in this conception of soteriology also an element of transcendence, and with the traditional trifecta of eschatology, soteriology, and transcendence we can definite not only a comprehensive scientific worldview, but we can also articulate a comprehensive conception of hope within this worldview, and that is much more that I thought possible only a short time ago.
image

Tagged: transhumanismGregor L. Hartmannsoteriologyeschatologytechnologytranscendencehope

  1. geopolicraticus posted this