Art Copyright © Tyler Spangler
Shop: society6.com/tylerspangler
Art Copyright © Tyler Spangler
Shop: society6.com/tylerspangler
Life is a one time offer, use it well.
saturday nite looks 🌙
“Mom, I’m gay.”
I love this video
It still gets funnier every time
ok we waitin’ on the announcement… is that the announcement?
I LOVE THIS SO MUCH
How to flirt 101.
my dog took a bullet for me
I’ve literally never seen an aminal move their butt around like that in my life
Cat: *shakes booty*
Dog: OH HELLLLLLL NO
In summary: The notion that only a couple of relevant genes affecting one trait–like a handful of genes involved in, say, bone growth for height variations–may be falling into the bucket of old and rejected scientific hypotheses. Scientists are now finding data that support a newer hypotheses that there’s actually a network of genes–some even unrelated to the characteristic in study–that can affect a single trait or disease. For example, the scientists in this article talk about how they may have identified as much as 100,000 genetic variants that affect just height alone. Each of those variants may have a very small or even seemingly irrelevant affect on height, but the effect ripples and builds.
Or, as a better metaphor from the article:
Put it this way: The Atlantic is produced by all of us who work here, but our lives are also affected by all the people we encounter—friends, roommates, partners, taxi drivers, passers-by etc. If you listed everyone who influences what happens at The Atlantic, even in small ways, all of those peripheral people would show up on the list. But almost none of them would tell you much about how we do journalism. They’re important, but also not actually that relevant. Pritchard thinks the same is true for our genes.
Fascinating article and worth a read. If the hypothesis turns out to be true, then this is about to become a significant paradigm shift in biology.