It seems like super tall ballerinas are getting much rarer—at one point it seemed like the Bolshoi had a minimum 5’8” height requirement for women (back in the day….) while nowadays a woman approaching six foot seems to be considered almost un-partnerable. Curious about why you think that is/if there has been as big of a shift from the ideal prima being tall to small as it seems on the outside.
I'm not sure it's been tall to small, but more tall to average?
There's still plenty of tall, leggy ballerinas but it's becoming much more common to see dancers who look tall due to exaggerated proportions, then dancers who in the 170-175+ height range. I think it has somthing to do with the 'technical revolution' that's been happening. There's a push for more turns, crazier jumps etc as that's what competitions and the media has been largely rewarding.
It's physically easier for shorter dancers to do more pirouettes, shorter limbs are quicker and lighter to move and easier to place. This is not about weight or anything at all, this is just simple physics. How many tall, leggy guys do you see doing a dozen pirouettes or chucking triple tours or 540s. Think about gymnastics or skating for instance, all the quads are physically more possible with shorter, more compact body types.
Rewarding people who can do the technical feats results in a talent pool that favors average height dancers, I would say around 165cm (5'5"). Why not short dancers, if we're comparing to gymnastics? Ballet is comparatively less extreme, and also balances aesthetics more clearly. There has long been the perception (and has been often proved wrong) that shorter dancers do not have the line or the elegance of taller dancers, so the ideal has ended up someone in the middle as a compromise.
You are right that his espeically becomes problematic for taller girls because it becomes difficult to find them partners. Especially for classical ballet, it's much easier if the girl is shorter than the guyA 5'10 girl will likely be taller or the same height as a guy who is 6'1" or 6'2." Not only are tall guys in high demand but a lot of the taller guys are now less attractive hires, because they lack the coodination to do the crazy tricks. Directors ideally want guys who can DANCE, in addition to partner. Sometimes it's simply hard to find or hire a partner for a very capable girl, so she just doesn't get hired.
However, taller guys with solid partnering skills get hiried all the time just to partner taller girls. But the numbers have to make sense, if a small company has just that one tall guy It's not smart to hire 5 or 6 girls if you only have one guy that can partner them- there's hiring and financial contrasints as well. Lots of factors here