Fah The Fool

✨ Young SRK supremacy ✨

Stills of Shahrukh Khan from Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham, Dil wale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge and Veer Zara

Devdas (2002)

Dir. Sanjay Leela Bhansali

Language: Hindi

https://www.instagram.com/p/CWdC3ffpiZ4

Girls will be like Idk why im so unproductive recently and then you ask whats going on in their life and they list eight lifestopping crisies and then say ‘yeah but i should be fine :/ ’

[ID: a short comic. the left panel shows a person from the waist down walking, holding a red handbag, with text reading ‘A person steals $2,500 of stuff from a company. Felony, up to 20 years in jail, right to vote revoked’.

the right panel shows a businessman in a suit holding up two large bags of money, with text reading ‘A company steals $140,000 from employee paychecks. In most states, not a crime, grace period to reply, can still buy politicians’. a small bubble by the businessman reads ‘Bonus: interest-free payments’.

the bottom panel reads ‘Criminalize wage thief. Why do we even have to say this?”

end ID.]

“Most theft is wage theft. Meaning, the dollar value of stolen wages is greater than the value, each year, of all burglaries + robberies, shoplifting, auto theft, combined. Yet, wage theft is not a crime.“ —Dave McKenna

i dont know what an NFT is and im too afraid to ask

imagine if you went up to the mona lisa and you were like "i'd like to own this" and someone nearby went "give me 65 million dollars and i'll burn down an unspecified amount of the amazon rainforest in order to give you this receipt of purchase" so you paid them and they went "here's your receipt, thank you for your purchase" and went to an unmarked supply closet in the back of the museum and posted a handmade label inside it behind the brooms that said "mona lisa currently owned by jacobgalapagos" so if anyone wants to know who owns it they'd have to find this specific closet in this specific hallway and look behind the correct brooms. and you went "can i take the mona lisa home now?" and they went "oh god no are you stupid? you only bought the receipt that says you own it, you didn't actually buy the mona lisa itself, you can't take the real mona lisa you idiot. you CAN take this though." and gave you the replica print in a cardboard tube that's sold in the gift shop. also the person selling you the receipt of purchase has at no point in time ever owned the mona lisa.

unfortunately, if this doesn't really make sense or seem like any logical person would be happy about this exchange, then you've understood it perfectly

it’s literally november which means next month is december which means it’s literally 2022

yo it’s literally november 3rd. what’s next the 4th? and then. no it can’t be.

studying in the law library • pembroke college, cambridge • summer 2018

😂😂😂😂 shaking his head.

I don't care about this saccharine Christian myth about guardian angel's and all that, but this comment? This comment wins:

god and jesus watching me trying to bang my guardian angel

Tumblr really has changed. There’s not a single Supernatural gif or even a reference to dean/cas on this post. are we really all too proud to remember our past?

Every time I hear about something from California it's always the worst thing I've ever heard

UC Kowloon

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/29/business/ucsb-munger-hall/index.html

Hey I'm an architectural designer and I think its smarter for us to assume this is about taking away tenants rights more than it is about some wannabe architect(we shouldn't call him an amateur because if you're not licensed using the term architect is fruad) designing a tenement house.

I want to discuss building code: the bane of Landlords and developers alike and essentially our only protection against tenements being recreated. The reason this is called a huge experiment is more than likely that the billionaire is trying to come up with a case to remove the natural light and ventilation requirements for California and probably the International Building Code as well.

If you didn't know all apartments are required to have a certain amount of natural daylighting and ventaliation, here is a snip of California's code regarding that:

Daylight is also another important factor and that's calculated by room usually, if it's designated a living space you have to provide windows.

Per example have you seen the tik tok of the insane apartment in New York city? Its so crazy because in new york bedrooms and living rooms require a certain amount of light to be legally sold. If you lack these chances are you're in an illegal unit. So they angled the walls to capture windows within minimum space requirements.

So back to the windowless dorms. (And yes dorms are different than residential housing but nation wide the rules are still apply to these occupancies). If you're rich enough you can basically sue for a variance to get around code. Usually this allows you to get away with designing more on a site but judging by the fact that he's also a Developer who has done this before in michigan: an area with weaker city inspectors/reviewers and donates to schools for the sole purpose of creating his downright evil psychological experiments...odds are pointing to the fact that he wants to "prove" legally that you can torcher people and still charge exuberant fees on space you couldn't sell before.

This all rightfully received outrage, please feel free to email the school, the zoning department, the mayor, the municipality, as well as the office of any future architects who are willing to create this and let them know this is not ethical.

I read the article and Munger (who is Warren Buffets business partner btw) claims the tiny windowless rooms are to encourage students to use the common space more which is the dumbest excuse I’ve ever heard. Like looking at the rooms it’s clearly attempt to prove that you can stuff a small university into a windowless dorm building with tiny ass bedrooms and only two exits in the whole building. Like it’s such an obvious attempt to recreate tenement housing. UC Santa Barbara students need to organize against this fast because they want to have people living there in the next few years and possibly build more as Munger is EXTREMELY confident this venture will be successful. Student organizers can be powerful, don’t let yourself be placed in this building if it is built, make sure it’s an abject failure and a stain on the campus so nobody ever tries it again. Here’s a quote from the original architect who quit because the design was unethical (Munger has since hired some fancy design firm to do it all for him):

McFadden wrote in the letter that the population density of Munger Hall would be slightly lower than a portion of Dhaka, Bangladesh, one of the most densely populated cities in the world. There are only two points of entry and exit.

"The project is essentially the student life portion of a mid-sized university campus in a box," McFadden wrote. "Munger Hall is an experiment in size and density with no precedent in student housing at that scale."

They plan on having over 500 students per floor? Beyond his attempts to use this in a potential future challenge to building codes it’s also just insanely unethical for the school to agree to this. I feel like UCs will basically just agree to any terms they’re dictated these days as long as they get a few hundred million out of it. This is the UCI School of Alternative Medicine fiasco except 100 times worse

As a side note, of the UC schools, UCSB is notorious for having THE absolute WORST housing.

also even if the majority of students are vaccinated, this sounds like they’re basically building a petri dish festering with disease