Avatar

The Enemy of Mine... Isn't He of Your Kind?

@victoriousscarf / victoriousscarf.tumblr.com

Graduate degree in history. Is never technically closed to prompts or requests. Loves random questions. Hobby knitter, writer, and cat enthusiast.

That heated mattress pad is paying for itself in blissed-out cat pictures.

Because my condo has a lot of tall, elderly windows, I get great natural light year round but also it takes a lot of energy to heat the whole place in winter. To save power and actually create somewhere consistently warm, I've taken to setting the thermostat low, closing the bedroom door most of the way, and running a space heater during the day. My home office is in the bedroom so it's where I spend most of every workday in any case, I don't have to constantly bundle up in my own home, and it has materially lowered my heating costs.

I do need to eat, of course, so a couple of times a day I go out into the colder condo for a snack or a meal. Bear in mind it's not like the place is subzero, I keep it livable, but it's definitely much colder and the cats are aware of that. Polk refuses to leave the warm bed, but Dearborn has now taken to escorting me whenever I leave the bedroom. She follows me and watches me while use the bathroom or while I eat in the kitchen, and if I'm not actively eating she starts trying to herd me back into the bedroom. It's extremely sweet, but she is a tiny cat and can't put a sweater or socks on, so her most effective tool is my guilt that she is also cold and is bravely suffering in order to make sure I don't freeze to death while I'm reheating a bowl of pasta.

Oh fuck, they're taking it in shifts.

Dearborn always comes with me during the day when Polk refuses to leave the heated bed, but I just realized that if it's after dark and I'm in the kitchen, Polk is actively monitoring the situation.

These little punks think I can't be left unsupervised when I leave the Warm Box like the fool I am. They've got a rota.

I feel like there's a certain type of "ex-evangelical" progressive who obviously supports mandatory progressive causes like abortion access and LGBT rights, but then in practice supports them "so strongly" that they can't compromise on anything. And if that means that they can't vote for candidates who support those issues because they aren't "good enough" and those issues get set back, well... That's a trade-off they're willing to make!

If there's one pro-choice candidate and one anti-choice candidate and you campaign against the pro-choice candidate because you don't think their support is strong enough, knowing that the alternative is the anti-choice candidate... I feel like you're not that pro-choice?

Or if you have one candidate who wants to maintain LGBT rights and one who wants to roll them back, and you oppose the pro-LGBT candidate because they don't want to... add 3 new sex markers to government IDs, but the other candidate wants to make it impossible to change the sex marker on your government ID at all... I don't think you're actually being very supportive of LGBT rights?

They are all clearly acting like they think they'll get the candidate they want next time. But next time the fight won't be over three new sex markers on IDs, the fight will be over civil rights. We are actively moving backwards.

"You are functionally a conservative". It doesn't matter if they believe in supporting queer rights. They probably do, but it doesn't matter. Because their choices, their actions, oppose those rights.

A candidate isn't perfect? Yeah, welcome to politics, where "Not Good Enough vs Horrible" is a good day. As long as Not Good Enough wins. Because there's ALWAYS Horrible options, always candidates that want to make things worse, and there's NEVER candidates that do everything you want. But one that wants to make things better? That's valuable. You're not going to solve everything today, but you can make things better tomorrow. And if you keep that up, keep making things better, things DO get solved.

When someone tells you that a progressive candidate isn't progressive enough? Well, yeah. That's probably true. And when they say that you shouldn't support what progress they would work toward? That letting the REgressive candidate win is better than an imperfect progressive?

You wish that officer a nice day, and you tell them to fuck ALL the way off.

Can't be sincerely dark without being called edgy, can't be sincerely emotional without being called melodramatic, can't be sincerely silly without being called stupid. They're gonna hate every emotion you put in your art no matter what so make it anyway and be as sincere as you can be

Art by Yinka Shonibare

1-2. How to Blow Up Two Heads at Once (Ladies) 3-4. The Age of Enlightenment: Adam Smith 5-6. The Age of Enlightenment: Gabrielle Emile le Tonnelier de Breteuil, Marquise de Chatelet

shonibare is an absolutely fantastic disabled british-nigerian artist who combines african textiles with european colonial fashion and props to specifically question and critique the eurocentric history of african exploitation, and the way european wealth was extracted from african people and land. tumblr hates reblogs with links but i highly encourage everyone to look up his wikipedia and personal website. ive seen some of his pieces in galleries and they’re life sized, gorgeous, and incredibly haunting.

2004, Scramble For Africa

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.