Avatar

leaving so bassoon?

@official-bassoon / official-bassoon.tumblr.com

Not an oboe. Not a trombone. Certainly not a clarinet, though clarinets are cool, too. And last, but not least, most certainly not a bong. I don't play anymore but still reblog band and orchestra posts from time to time. Main is @i-want-to-be-manhandled
Avatar

new motherfucking poop flavor

Thhis is real. Unedited.

Grossest “Pr Stunt” basiNBRrobbiNs has pulled.

Juvenile. Is this really true? Could it be?

Sadly yes is true.

Avatar
reblogged

Ya know sometimes I feel like minding my own business as a musician but then I remember the guy next to me playing on black moldy reeds and just needing to tell him that it was horrid

It’s sorta like the whole celebrities not showering thing

Change your reeds, kids!

Avatar
reblogged

University of Kansas music educator Martin Bergee thought that if he could just control his study for the myriad factors that might have influenced previous ones — race, income, education, etc. — he could disprove the notion of a link between students’ musical and mathematical achievement.

Nope. His new study, “Multilevel Models of the Relationship Between Music Achievement and Reading and Math Achievement,” published in the Journal of Research in Music Education, showed statistically significant associations between the two at both the individual and the school-district levels. That the study of more than 1,000 mainly middle-school-age students showed no such association at the classroom or school levels only shows how rigorously it was conceived by Bergee, professor of music education and music therapy, and his co-author and doctoral student Kevin Weingarten, current a visiting professor at the University of Washington.

The study has implications for school board members considering budgets that affect music programs. It adds to the body of scientific research showing linkages between music and math/reading. And in his conclusion, Bergee even suggests some specific reasons for why that might be.

“There has been this notion for a long time,” Bergee said, “that not only are these areas related, but there's a cause-and-effect relationship — that as you get better in one area, you will, per se, get better in another area. The more you study music, the better you're going to be at math or reading. That's always been suspect with me.

“I've always believed that the relationship is correlational and not causational. I set out to demonstrate that there are probably a number of background variables that are influencing achievement in any academic area — in particular, things like the educational level of the family, where the student lives, whether they are white or non-white, and so forth.

“Those variables are in the article, and there are lots of them. My intention was to was to show that the relationships are probably spurious, meaning that background influences are the main drivers of the relationships, and once those outside influences, like demographics, etc., are controlled for, the relationship essentially disappears.

“But hang on. Much to my surprise, not only did they not disappear, but the relationships are really strong.”

Bergee apologizes for the complexity of the study’s design, but said, “It's not an easy thing to determine, because there are influences that can happen at different levels. It can be an influence at the level of the individual person, but there are also influences that can happen at the classroom, school and school-district level, and those are hierarchical. That involves a complicated set of analyses.”

Even though he was prepared to write “a completely different conclusion,” Bergee said he has thought a lot about what the findings show.

The authors write that: “Perhaps music discrimination at a more micro level — pitches, intervals, meters — shares a cognitive basis with certain patterns of discrimination in speech. Similarly, perhaps the more macro skills of modal and tonal center discrimination share some psychological or neurological space with aspects of math cognition. ... Results of the present study ... at least point to the possibility.”

“Based on the findings, the point we tried to make is that there might be, and probably are, general learning processes that underlie all academic achievement, no matter what the area is,” Bergee said. “Music achievement, math achievement, reading achievement – there are probably more generalized processes of the mind that are brought to bear on any of those areas.

“Therefore, if your goal is to educate the person – to develop the person's mind — then you need to educate the whole person. In other words, learning may not be as modular as it is often thought to be.”

It implies more than introducing children to subjects, Bergee said: “Develop them in these subjects. See that learning is taking place. See that development is, too.”

Bergee said his study wasn’t intended to show that learning music will necessarily improve a child’s math or reading scores.

“It would not be impossible, but really difficult to do a truly definitive study,” Bergee said. “My inclination is that it would not show a strong effect, but that's what I said about this study. I actually don't know.

“If you want a young person's — or any person’s — mind to develop, then you need to develop it in all ways it can be developed,” he said. “You can't sacrifice some modes of learning to other modes of learning for whatever reason, be it financial or societal.”

as much as music should be learnt for music's sake not just because it helps you with The Useful Stuff, i'm glad to see him proven wrong

Avatar

What instruments do you play?

Him: yes

[Tiktok: white text asking “Musicians, what instruments do you play?” Cuts to a man asking the question aloud. Cuts to another man in a pink shirt who proceeds to play ‘Fireflies’ by Owl City on a seemingly unending series of instruments, initially only doing one note of the song per instrument.]

Avatar
Avatar
exeggcute

one of my favorite this american life segments of late is about the people who played orchestra pit for phantom of the opera on broadway and how, like, a sizeable majority of them had literally been playing the show since it opened in 1988 (on broadway. I know it opened in 86 on the west end, you random pedants, but I am specifically talking about broadway musicians) because their contracts stipulated that they'd have jobs throughout the show's entire run... but nobody anticipated that phantom would become the longest-running broadway show of all time.

and none of these people wanted to walk away from a guaranteed job, so very few of them ever quit. they just kept doing the same show eight nights a week... for twenty or thirty years... and by the time it finally closed last year most of these musicians (who had been working together for DECADES) hated each other and really really fucking loathed phantom. I can't stop thinking about it. it's indescribably hellish to imagine but also the funniest thing I've ever heard in my life.

can you imagine.

Avatar
reblogged

so i've just finished writing this piece for my compositional portfolio based on a,,, creative interpretation of the myth of icarus and i'm having far too much fun with it

someone stop me sending this to my supervisor tomorrow

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

With our new bell masks in band I can hit a low A without an extension

i love this for you, a+

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.