I read A Well-Trained Wife: My Escape From Christian Patriarchy (significant trigger warnings for rape and abuse and all forms of intimate partner violence and religious trauma), by Tia Levings, who’s also interviewed on the Prime documentary about the Duggar family, Shiny Happy People (trigger warnings for rape and CSA and religious trauma). A lot of things to think about and unpack.
One of those being: I already knew that there was a lot of themes of gender essentialism and tradwife ideology in omegaverse fic, but I didn’t realize the extent to which it was connected to Christian fundamental ideology.
The high level, extremely basic understanding I have of the structure of Christian fundamentalism is that there is a hierarchy. God above men, men above women, women above children. Women belong to their fathers until they are married and then they belong to their husbands. Their only place is at home, doing domestic labour and having as many children as they are physically able to.
There is currently in the world a very real and increasingly widespread idea that women must be submissive to their husbands. That the female ideal is to be a submissive wife. Christian fundamentalist content slips references to Taming of the Shrew as a signal of a certain world view - the idea that women should be trained into submission through physical abuse.
It’s not submission in the way people consensually do kink, where the submissive person ultimately has all the power and is able to choose what happens and when it stops. Tradwives, in the Christian fundamentalist ideology, are not allowed to say no. They’re not allowed to get divorced. They’re not equal to their husbands. There is no such thing as rape within a marriage because a man is entitled to sex any time he wants it and if a woman resists, the problem is that she’s being disobedient. Men are the sole decision makers. Physical abuse of wives and children is encouraged. It is necessary to break willfulness. It is necessary to provide correction. While it may be the case that, if given all the freedom and choice, some women would choose that life, in a context where it is not possible to say no and there are no other alternatives to choose from, actual consent is impossible.
In my observation, omegaverse has shifted from being a mechanism for the previously more common sex pollen trope (mating cycles having the same impact) and themes of body horror, social commentary, and reflections on biological expressions of self. To, now, becoming a common place, baseline setting for fanfic. And it makes sense: there’s a lot of porn fodder. There’s a lot of complexity to play around with - power dynamics, biological determinism, any number of different fetishes.
But omegaverse is invented. We can write it any way that we choose. So we should be aware of the choices we are making and the fact that many of the choices common to the trope are ultimately upholding a patriarchal world view. That an omega (wife) is submissive to the alpha (husband) they have bonded to (married) and will feel a biological imperative to reproduce and "give their alpha pups" (quiverfull), compelled to obey the power of an alpha's voice (the rule of their husband). That there is a biological necessity for this. That all of society would agree omegas are weaker than alphas.
If someone wants to take the extreme gender binary presented in this world view and write some breeding kink because that’s what tickles their fancy… great! You do you! I'm just suggesting that we have a responsibility to be aware of the larger real life context to what we’re writing - and the world views are we endorsing, explicitly or implicitly.
There is nothing inherently and biologically submissive about a person in a body capable of giving birth. While there are many valid reasons why people may wish to write literally any dynamic (including: it's hot, nothing deeper than that), we should be aware of the ways that we may have internalized patriarchal messaging. Christian fundamentalists are trying to convert people to their worldview. We receive messages designed to indoctrinate from all sorts of places. It's in traditional media, it's in social media. It's in politics. It's in commencement speeches.
We can do and write and read whatever we want (an opinion not shared by Christian fundamentalists), but we should be aware that we are making choices. We should do so intentionally, with enough information to understand what we're choosing to portray.
We are not required to take patriarchal worldviews as inherent in our world building. Gender essentialism is just as fictional as omegaverse.