The whole Brexit process is quite remarkable. Whenever I think it has plumbed the depths and reached rock bottom, some new excavation happens and down we go.
On Monday we had the farce where a sure-to-work, guaranteed win-win border deal with the Republic of Ireland fell to bits when it emerged that Theresa May hadn’t consulted with the ultra-nationalist DUP, who promptly refused to support her despite the £1 billion bribe they got to keep them voting for her government after she lost it’s majority earlier this year. Today, it’s yet more farce as we have discovered the fate of David Davis’ Brexit impact assessments.
The assessments, he assured us, were numerous and painstakingly detailed. More than fifty separate studies, he said. Work of such quality that the European Union has nothing even on the same scale, he said. Well let’s see it, said Parliament, passing a motion compelling Davis and his department to publish these reports they claimed they had.
Um. Er. The dog ate them, said Davis. Weeks passed with the Speaker of the House getting increasingly impatient. Even arch-Brexiteers started to mutter that withholding such information when Parliament had explicitly demanded publication flew in the face of the British constitution.
Only now we have his admission that the dog did not in fact eat any of the homework, but that the homework was not in fact completed at all. No impact assessments have been carried out. The sectoral analyses are not quantitative, have no numbers attached, and don’t contain any forecasts of likely impacts on any sectors of the economy at all. The whole thing consists of 850 pages of report of which Davis has read zero pages. And in any case, he regards the lot of it as being basically a waste of time and paper, as ‘forecasts are always wrong anyway’. Great.
The icing on the cake that we can both have and eat is that the Parliamentary committee that’s meant to be scrutinising this shitshow has today voted that Davis is not in breach of any constitutional norms and that his cannot be held in contempt of Parliament. The non-existence of the reports he claimed to have, apparently, frees him from any obligation to fulfil Parliament’s instruction to publish them.
Of course, with the Conservative Party taking ten places on the committee and the DUP holding one, leaving opposition parties with only eight places, it was always possible that the party line would prevail. In the immediate aftermath of the election earlier this year, Theresa ensured that the loss of her majority in Parliament would have as little effect on the day-to-day as possible by using procedural rules and slightly expensive DUP support to maintain Conservative majorities on the committees. The result is that the bodies intended for holding the government to account have government majorities and remain, unsurprisingly, quite uncritical of the negligence, incompetence and wilful political vandalism taking place on a now daily basis.
The whole thing demonstrates, yet again, that the British constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s not written on.