I admire fandom meta and commentary writers so much. and they fill an invaluable niche in this social environment. but despite my sporadic efforts to the cause, I know I'm never going to cut it as one because
a) disagreement sends me into a spiral of anger and self doubt and lashing out and existential crisis about 'i could prove them wrong, but at what cost? their happiness and mine?', instead of inflaming me with passionate self-righteousness which I can then turn into mocking rebuttals.
b) rereading even my most unpopular fics fills me with a sense of joy and 'isn't this neat :) truly prose is my most favourite medium for art' whereas rereading even my most popular meta posts makes me want to set my entire blog on fire.
I'm saying blaming a popular meta writer for being too arrogant is basically like blaming a surgeon for being too flippant and self asured about putting their hands in your guts. or blaming a butcher for being too callous about murdering animals. or blaming the president for being corrupt. like, you could and you wouldn't be wrong, but what's the point?
like do you think anyone would put up with such a thankless shitty task otherwise? would you be able to deal with hundreds of rude replies, people missing your point entirely, parasocial affection and offense and envy, people looking to you to enact shaudenfreudic takedowns on your detractors, on a social media site designed to make you behave compulsively and seek attention be it positive or negative, if you weren't a little bit fucking arrogant and immune to criticism?