For anyone who cares to wonder why I have been so quiet these months.... read on.
kellpod reblogged
“Rooting for [Johnlock] brought tremendous joy into people’s lives, but it also unleashed real darkness into the world” but not the first 115 years that people theorized it, just the last few when those women on the internet started talking about it
kellpod reblogged
Anonymous asked:
What’s the 221b con drama? I’ve never heard of this
Here’s a collection of a few more highly detailed accounts. I’ll leave you to your own conclusions, but at the very least an 18+ panel was filmed and posted online without permission.
If we’re going to play the link game, then maybe you should check out this link so you can get both sides of what happened before jumping on the “hate Grace” bandwagon. I’ve seen the 2 videos that were uploaded during that time and there was no drama in either one. The person basically strips down the “sources” and claims that the 124 links given in the page are “by nature, the anonymous opinions, reactions, generalizations, speculations, and recollections of people who dislike Grace. People who not only dislike Grace, but spend their time discussing the various reasons they dislike her. And then archiving them in a wiki article.“ I recommend that you read the link, since it’s highly detailed as well.
kellpod reblogged
hunterzolomon-deactivated201811
#dad mode activated
kellpod reblogged
面白かった！
wow 💖💖💖
kellpod reblogged
kellpod reblogged
He can’t wait to go to doggy school…
At first I thought it was going to be, like, a car but when it was actually a bus it made this video even better!
the most wholesome content
Source: babyanimalgifs
Anonymous asked:
Who is that anon anyway, telling tjlcers that they can't believe in a conspiracy if they don't like what Moffat and Gatiss are doing? I mean srsly people it's not like they're rules to follow when TJLC was created
Like I would never tell anyone, “No, you should play along with Mofftiss, because they’re up to something and it could be good,” or “don’t shit on my pro-Mofftiss post just because you got issues with them,” or “if you leave TJLC you were never a TJLCer in the first place.”
People come and go. I don’t hold it against those that give up. I do however don’t like it when some of our own drags another because they were done™. And I especially hate it when someone who “used to be” part of TJLC/johnlock attacks one of us. But the whole “losing faith/moving on” thing? That’s perfectly relatable.
Like, my dude, if I don’t want to “play along” with some stupid game of Mofftiss’, then what the fuck has it got to do with you.
Anonymous asked:
If you hate Mofftiss so much then why are you still stating that you stand for TJLC lmao
lol Nonny wow. I gotta be honest with ya. I’m loving all this examining of someone who has different views than you.
I will always be a TJLCer. I’m not going to stop just because of what happened. I don’t trust Moffat and Gatiss and it makes me wary to speculate that they could be up to something, whether good or bad. I shipped Johnlock way before this damn show. I don’t expect to be swept off my feet in the future by Mofftiss but I will never stop believing that there was something fishy going on and that the show was headed for johnlock. I will admit, there’s always something fishy going on. But there are going to be days when I’m s-l-i-g-h-t-l-y interested and then there are going to be days - like today - when I’m sort of done with the bullshit. I’m allowed to have my own opinion, just like you with yours.
Sorry if you’re not on a high enough level to understand that. If you can’t, that’s not my problem. *shrug*
Omaze shouldn’t have Una Stubbs cook anything for those people. Granted, we all know she’s awesome at it, but she’s a queen, so let her sit in the most luxurious chair and IDK, maybe have Loo stand in the kitchen wearing a cherry patterned apron while everyone else sits in comfy chairs, listening to Ben tell stories. At one point, Una whispers just loud enough for Moffat to hear, “I wish Martin was invited”
Anonymous asked:
lol lol So there was this post that exists, regarding this issue that Eurus saying Sherlock having a secret sister is tied all the way back to Sherlock incorrectly deducing John’s sibling, and it’s about the reveal regarding Eurus’ gender I'm choking on my own laughter
They always find a way to make it all about themselves, don’t they, Nonny?
Anonymous asked:
I wish we had seen John's sister. I read her in so many fics and hoped for an appearance in season 4, but instead we were given an X-men crossover
Anon…..bro…. me too, you have NO IDEA. A lot of us did, we expected Harry to show up in s4. Can you imagine what one conversation would be when John says, “I’m not gay,” and then Harry pops in all, “Of course not, brother, but you’re not straight either”
Anonymous asked:
Tom Hiddleston showing up in S4 as Sherlock's brother would have been enjoyable. I'm with you as one of the people who groaned when fans wanted him to be on the show, but after Sian's performance as Eurus, Tom would have been a creepy as fuck villain and he could do it without the dumbass mutant powers lmao
Tom could be dressed up as Loki and it would make more sense.
kellpod reblogged
Not to bring back annoying topics such as Eurus and Mofftiss’ lying, but when they said that “we should have listened to the subtext” how the hell were we supposed to think there was a sister? I’m talking about, how analytical and in depth we johnlockers have been since the beginning, and there’s a hell of a lot more subtext and hints about johnlock than…. Sherlock having a sister. More like, a thousand to one.
Other than Mycroft’s “You know what happened to the other one,” I still don’t get how we can be told we weren’t paying attention. The concept of show with Sherlock having a secret sister somewhere is lunacy. Especially when you think about how overwhelming they made johnlock appear throughout the series.
We did listen, so fuck you.
Right? It makes no sense. There were no hints to the Xman sister, other than the “other one” throw-away comment. And many people did speculate the other one WAS a sister.
As @one-thousand-splendid-stars mentioned in the comments about the “sister, there’s always something” comment in ASIP, that line so pointed to Sherlock assuming it was a brother and not a gay sister. So fuck Mofftiss and their warm past.
I remember some also thinking it was another brother, and that got a lot of people hoping it could be Tom Hiddleston making a future appearance, which made my eyes roll. I never thought in my wildest dreams that Mofftiss’ purpose in adapting a modern version of Sherlock would be to show him how he became the man he was, and it’s because of his psycho sister, as if who he was was wrong. It was a huge slap in the face to those who saw themselves like him in various ways. Not to mention the final nail in the coffin, Mary saying in the video that “who you are, it doesn’t matter.”
What Mofftiss did is akin to someone telling you about this BIG dinner they’re preparing for you, mash potatoes and gravy, biscuits, turkey, apple pie, all the fucking works - only to have you come over and sit at the table and be served a pathetic salad on a paper plate. When you ask about the dinner they planned, they stare at you like you’re fucking mad.
one-thousand-splendid-stars replied your post: “Not to bring back annoying topics such as Eurus and Mofftiss’ lying...”
Mycroft comment and “Sister! There’s always something!” from ASiP we’re literally the only things. And even that could have been Johnlock subtext because the first error made on the show is assuming someone is straight
That was the whole point, John correcting Sherlock that Harry was actually Harriet and also a lesbian. [Sherlock = actually gay] Sherlock had assumed John had a brother since the significant other was “Clara” and of course, it’s natural for some people to believe it was a straight relationship because at first assumption Harry is a man’s name. [casuals thinking Sherlock is straight] Turns out, we and Sherlock were wrong and told that John’s sibling was not only a sister, but gay.
Moffat’s whole “If you’re not reading the subtext then hell mend you” is complete and utter bullshit, since there’s literally NO SUBTEXT about Sherlock having a sister.
They were right about the rugpull though. They surprised all their fans by shitting on their own show. Sherlollians eat up on that quality material.
Not to bring back annoying topics such as Eurus and Mofftiss’ lying, but when they said that “we should have listened to the subtext” how the hell were we supposed to think there was a sister? I’m talking about, how analytical and in depth we johnlockers have been since the beginning, and there’s a hell of a lot more subtext and hints about johnlock than.... Sherlock having a sister. More like, a thousand to one.
Other than Mycroft’s “You know what happened to the other one,” I still don’t get how we can be told we weren’t paying attention. The concept of show with Sherlock having a secret sister somewhere is lunacy. Especially when you think about how overwhelming they made johnlock appear throughout the series.
We did listen, so fuck you.