holy shit that's so fucked up. not replacing a job yet, but still
like. they're literally putting words in a real dead woman's mouth using a computer
and yeah a human first-person interpreter is a similar thing but like...humans can think critically about Mrs. Potter and her sociocultural context way more than a machine can. humans can approach her and her life with far more understanding and nuanced consideration than a machine can. not every interpreter would, and both systems still bring the biases of the interpreter or the programmers to the table (as all historical interpretation does), but a good human interpreter could still do this job far better than an unfeeling machine
Maybe they set up parameters so it just generates responses about the wedding and clothing? I really, really hope that's the case, at least.
(Also- it's replacing a single chonk of text today. It could be used to replace ALL exhibit text in the future if we're not careful, and that is someone's job. or a significant part of it)