Avatar

A Group Which Almost Became Historic

@capable-of-being-terrible / capable-of-being-terrible.tumblr.com

Will / he-him / trans disaster bi/ #1 fan of jean prouvaire
Avatar
Avatar
breadvidence

Please mind the #wineposting tag. Regardless: are you asking, "Should I watch this adaptation of Les Misérables?" I'll give you advice, though I suspect if you are reading this blog post you have watched all of these anyway (and quite possibly a few more, besides!).

'25 (Fescourt): Probably! If you are a Brick fan none of the adaptation choices will startle you, but having visuals to go with key scenes is a treat. This is a loyal piece. Toulout as Javert, Gabrio as Valjean, Milovanoff as Fantine, and Nivette as Éponine all give excellent performances. Be prepared for a lukewarm Cosette. You might struggle with silent film conventions, length, and French intertitles.

'34 (Bernard): Probably! This is a fairly loyal adaptation of the Brick that makes internally consistent choices where it deviates from its source (sometimes it has goofy continuity errors—politely ignore). Baur as Valjean and Gaël as Cosette give fabulous performances. Moments of silliness do not detract from the quality. Another long haul.

'35 (Boleslawski): Probably not. As an adaptation of Les Misérables this film is bad. That being said, Charles Laughton is a lauded actor, and you can't say he didn't put his whole laughussy into his performance. Because it is accessible and prominent, a lot of LM fans will have seen this film, and you might benefit from shared context if you're in fandom. Speaking personally, I'm glad I saw it, but I'm not sure you will be.

'52 (Milestone): No. Most likely based on '35 rather than on the book, this film is also a bad adaptation of Les Misérables. There are no notable performances. Because it is accessible, this is another adaptation many fans are familiar with, but understanding jokes about Valjean's boyfriend Robert and Javert's sentient hat probably don't justify sitting through the movie.

'58 (Le Chanois): No. Not the English dub, at least. "Bland" is the word of the day. Contemporary French audiences wildly disagree with me per Wikipedia.

'72 (Bluwal): Strong maybe. If you are an intense fan of the Brick, yes. Its use of a narrator to draw from the novel directly and its focus on the Amis makes this adaptation unique on this list. You might not end up liking it but you will have had an experience. If you have zero investment in Les Misérables but are still reading this post for some reason: no, do not watch this.

'78 (Jordan): At some point I will talk about this film and not make a gay joke but today is not that day. If you are not queer, get off my blog, you cis straight, begone. Everyone else: yes, watch this movie, c'mon. Perkins. That performance. At some point I need to make a serious post about queerness and '78 but right now all I've got is Javert's literal on-screen boner. Jesus Christ. Not a great adaptation of the novel but a virtuoso example of unintentional homoeroticism.

'82 (Hossein): No. This is an odd little adaptation without the charisma of a '35 or '78, somehow not as bad as either of those but not as good either. The GIF of the Amis walking in heavy wind is the best this film has to offer.

'98 (August): No—but I stared into my wine glass for a long, long time before typing those two letters. If we are judging adaptations by how they handle the source material, this is a disaster. As a film? I'm sure entertained. I call it bitchslap Les Mis. I should note here I am also a huge fan of Uma Thurman. Possibly I should recuse myself. I don't know, pal. IDK.

2012 (Hooper): I dwell bitterly on the fact that this is our film version of the musical. Brick fans are restless, musical fans are restless. People who first encountered Les Mis via this version are making feral noises. I'm afraid. I'm moving on.

2018 (Davies): It's really unfortunate that I am at my most drunk while commenting on this adaptation. Sure, watch it, it's one of those BBC series that has watchability sheerly because of production value and proximity to contemporary narrative/film expectations/standards. Personally I hate it. My partner is so tired of the tone in which I utter the syllables "Oyelowo".

The Musical: yes c'mon. Bootleg that good bitch.

Avatar

Victor Hugo is so frustrating bc he will write the most insanely beautiful heartfelt fiery and unshakable speech about the necessities and honor of revolution, only to turn around and say: but of course, reallllyyy, the world will slowly get better anyway. like. Why are you not listening to Enjolras? He is knocking pounding stamping his feet on the inside of your brain trying to get out and you don’t listen to him?

Avatar

lesmisofficial-wrapped…we need to collect all the dumbass things they posted on twitter this year

okay here we go and as a bonus i have ranked them in order of stupidity

coming in at number four we have this one from last week. it’s stupid and inaccurate to attribute the lyrics from the musical to victor hugo instead of herbert kretzmer, but it’s not as horribly insensitive as the other posts on this list. embarrassing that there are multiple people on instagram and twitter correcting them yet the tweet is still up

for number three, we have this one that was tweeted after the queen’s death and then deleted a few hours later. because les mis is totally a musical that celebrates and also mourns the monarchy….

spot number two is taken up by this one. “suck it, working class, your protests for rights won’t stop us from performing our musical that…focuses on the struggles of the working class and is all about fighting for freedom and a better life?” huh. again, it was deleted, but good lord

and last but not least, plategate. not only is it again celebrating the monarchy, but it depicts the image of a starving child on a plate AND it was the only thing they posted around the time of barricade day. they deleted it thank god but like. come on. you couldn’t have figured this one out on your own?

jesus christ. here’s hoping something fucking changes next year!

Avatar

yeah. enjolras and grantaire are foils (belief vs. cynicism). but so are enjolras and combeferre (logic vs. philosophy) and enjolras and valjean (justice vs. mercy) and enjolras and javert (revolution vs. rule of law) and enjolras and eponine (privilege vs. poverty) and enjolras and montparnasse (altruistic beauty vs. selfish beauty) and-

Avatar
Avatar
libraryfag
there have been, perhaps
a thousand different versions of this story.
names lost to the wind,
people lost to history
flags that have fallen to the ground
and martyrs unknown
fallen cynics who woke too late
and leaders who nearly died alone
there have been far too many versions of it
the people who rise
while the tyrants cuts them down
and they have their sacrifice
and each like bricks pile together
eulogising the lost life
each knowing the suffering of the one before
each understanding the strife
are we making a fort, then,
you ask the brick and stone
it shakes almost as if laughs
no, we're building a home.

this is beautiful, thank you /gen

Avatar
Avatar
kainosite

Jean-François-Elysée Boutin

Jean-François-Elysée Boutin enters the ranks of the Lesser-Known Badasses because he’s a black guy.

Lest the more conservative members of our fandom think this a case of affirmative action and start screaming about political correctness (I see you there, Ayn Rand), allow me to refer you to the Journal des débats:

“The color of the accused was the most remarkable circumstance of the case judged today by the Court of Assizes.”

Yeeeeah.

In fact, the papers cannot shut up about it.  Even the briefest articles about the case feel compelled to mention Boutin’s race, often in contexts where it has no relevance whatsoever.  But as you’ll see in a moment, it probably did have a material impact on the case.  Indeed, it may be the whole reason why Boutin is here.

Avatar

Jean Prouvaire

A poignant emotion clouded the joy of the disencumbered barricade.
The roll was called. One of the insurgents was missing. And who was it? One of the dearest. One of the most valiant. Jean Prouvaire. He was sought among the wounded, he was not there. He was sought among the dead, he was not there. He was evidently a prisoner. Combeferre said to Enjolras:–
“They have our friend; we have their agent. Are you set on the death of that spy?”
“Yes,” replied Enjolras; “but less so than on the life of Jean Prouvaire.”
This took place in the tap-room near Javert’s post.
“Well,” resumed Combeferre, “I am going to fasten my handkerchief to my cane, and go as a flag of truce, to offer to exchange our man for theirs.”
“Listen,” said Enjolras, laying his hand on Combeferre’s arm.
At the end of the street there was a significant clash of arms.
They heard a manly voice shout:–
“Vive la France! Long live France! Long live the future!”
They recognized the voice of Prouvaire.
A flash passed, a report rang out.
Silence fell again.
“They have killed him,” exclaimed Combeferre.

Les Miserables 4.14.5 (Hapgood translation)

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.