Avatar

Author Rhiannon Frater

@rhiannonfrater / rhiannonfrater.tumblr.com

Full-time writer of books with female protagonists dealing with monsters of all kinds. I am best known for my zombie trilogy, As The World Dies, from Tor. I reblog what interests me, so yer warned!
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
flanaganfilm

Is there any one thing that you've written/directed that scares you more than anything else you've created? Or perhaps something you've created that you thought was so scary it shouldn't be made public and you cut it?

Avatar

The scene that scared me the most in my career was the baseball boy sequence of DOCTOR SLEEP. I knew the story needed the scene, it was an essential moment, and I was following the blueprint that Stephen King had laid out in the novel, but still... I'd thought we could sidestep a lot of the trauma by filming around the actual violence. I figured keeping all of it off screen and only focusing on a closeup of Jacob's face would help soften the impact, but Jacob delivered such a realistic and heartbreaking performance that the scene felt even more brutal than I'd thought it would be. (I always try to mention here - Jacob was absolutely fine. He had prepared the performance with his father in the weeks leading up to the shoot, and he hopped up off the ground after the first take with a big grin on his face. He knew he'd leveled all of us, he high-fived his dad and sauntered over to the craft service table while we stood there speechless and with tears in our eyes.) That scene affected all of us very deeply, and it remains the scariest thing I've ever filmed. I cut it back several times in the edit, and even that didn't do anything to dull the impact. When I showed the film to Stephen King, he said "I love the movie... but that baseball boy scene is a bit much though" and I didn't know what to say besides "... you wrote it!" I'm glad it's in the movie, and it is an essential part of that story - but man, that is tough to watch. My wife still hasn't seen all of it. During early test screenings, she'd leave the room before it started playing. I find myself looking away from it, even to this day.

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
orkazh-arts
"Every time someone steps up and says who they are the world becomes a better, more interesting place." 🫶🏳️‍🌈

My tribute to Andre Braugher, thank you for Captain Raymond Holt ❤️✨

Avatar

1. The Republican Party turns out for EVERY vote. Primaries, local elections, midterms, you name it. Most dems show up once every four year and then get defeatist when things don’t immediately change. It took the Republicans YEARS to overturn RvW but it has been a long game goal of theirs. YEARS of voting, and you’re gonna opt out after one vote. Okay.

2. Primaries are when you vote for who you want. Elections are when you vote for who you can. If you’re not voting in the primary, you’re letting the moderate centrist do-nothing candidate win.

3. Local elections affect your daily life. That sherif in Texas who is refusing to enforce the abortion ban? Local election. Gerrymandering, voter suppression, so much of this is trickle up from local politics.

4. Call your damn representatives. Even if it feels hopeless. The gun control reform that just passed (as minimal as it is) was bipartisan because people showed their reps that they wanted change. Get vocal as a voter and prove courting your vote matters.

5. If someone in your area is running for office and needs votes, be a signature for them. Not everyone can afford to pay to run. You want to support better candidates, put your name behind them (only in your district and always read what you’re signing first).

6. The two party system is shit. We know that. But the democrats are a big tent housing a lot of different opinions and trying to cater to them all. Republicans are generally united in one mission of dismantling everything and protecting only their own. This is also why Dems don’t have the same type of “super majority” and can’t easily whip the same voting results. And anyone who thinks Obama had a super majority for enough time to codify roe does not understand politics. He had about 18 days of actual in-session time, split into two different sessions.

7. Purity politics isn’t going to get you anywhere. The candidate is a bus stop getting you closer to where you want to be. They’re not the end goal, and a smart voter knows that.

8. Voter suppression is huge in America. Help other voters register and get to the polls. It’s not always indifference keeping people from voting. Do something to help disenfranchised voters.

Let me repeat: The two party system is shit. We need to get rid of the electoral college. We need ranked choice voting. We need to get rid of Citizens United. Our country is an oligarchy. Always has been. Not denying that. But Living in these ideals of what we should be without creating any change now isn’t going to get you anywhere. Being defeatist and abstaining from the process is cutting off your own nose to spite your face. Its saying “the other team is scoring too many goals, so instead of playing, I’m just gonna sit on the sidelines. That’ll teach everyone.” No, you’re just gonna keep losing. Maybe, instead, vote in the primaries and choose better teammates.

Y’all kill me with these “hot takes.” They ain’t even half baked.

Now, if you want to talk about the other things we should be doing IN ADDITION TO voting, like general strikes, organizing, etc. Then that’s a different conversation we should also be having.

Avatar
stele3

Also no, there is no such thing as “one more vote.” Vote every time. Vote consistently. Vote national. Vote local. It’s the absolute MINIMAL amount of civil engagement you can do. If you can do more than vote, do more, but at least vote every single time.

Avatar
nyxelestia

A lot of people really think democracy is something they only have to do once. It's not. It's something we do constantly - because greedy and power-hungry and malicious people are constantly trying to take advantage of society. Evil never stops, so neither do we.

Avatar
labelleizzy

Evil never stops, so neither do we.

VOTE.

Avatar
lierdumoa

"Just wash one more dish bro I swear then we won't have to do dishes anymore bro come on just one more load of laundry bro and then I promise all the clothes will be clean ok just trust me bro the chores will definitely be done okay just sweep the kitchen floor and take out the trash this one last time it'll work I swear you'll never have to do chores again I promise."

Grow the fuck up.

Vote in every election. Over and over again until you die. It's a chore. That's how chores work.

Avatar
reblogged

A chainsaw appeared on my bed so I took it. I kept thinking of what I could chop with it. I was thinking so much about it that I woke up without getting to use it.

Deadites

Avatar
Avatar
thegoatsongs
The Spectator [19th century British magazine] thought that while Stoker made admirable use of “vampirology,” the story might have been better had it been set in an earlier period. “The up-to-dateness of the book—the phonograph, diaries, typewriters, and so on—hardly fits in with the mediaeval methods which ultimately secure the victory for Count Dracula’s foes.”

On the subject that contemporaries thought that Dracula was too up-to-date for a vampire story.

Avatar
petermorwood

TL;DR - the 1897 novel "Dracula" by Bram Stoker wasn't just vampire horror, it was also a techno-thriller.

*****

Excuse me, did I just see diaries dismissed as too up-to-date and modern for the atmosphere of "Dracula"?

Samuel Pepys (1633-1703) kept a famous diary from 1660-69 and would like to have a word with someone about that.

*****

"Dracula" was first published in 1897, and Bram Stoker had been researching it since about 1890 (he had Other Things To Do) so for my own amusement I went looking for the sort of Excessive Modern Technology that "The Spectator" criticised.

*****

Mina Harker (née Murray) can write in shorthand, which at that time was usually done in pencil. Stenography fountain pens were also popular (Jonathan Harker uses one) but faded away, while steno pencils are still sold to this day.

I have been working very hard lately, because I want to keep up with Jonathan’s studies, and I have been practising shorthand very assiduously. When we are married I shall be able to be useful to Jonathan, and if I can stenograph well enough I can take down what he wants to say in this way and write it out for him on the typewriter, at which also I am practising very hard. He and I sometimes write letters in shorthand, and he is keeping a stenographic journal of his travels abroad.

She uses two typewriters in the course of the book. The one in England mentioned above and in subsequent chapters is probably a desktop model, perhaps an Underwood or Remington suitable for a solicitor's office...

However, as played by Winona Ryder in the film "Bram Stoker's Dracula", she uses a smaller Oliver...

...whose design, deliberately or by accident, seems to echo Gary Oldman's Dracula hair.

Mina specifically describes the other machine like this:

"I feel so grateful to the man who invented the “Traveller’s” typewriter, and to Mr. Morris for getting this one for me."

This suggests it's a much smaller and lighter portable, probably with a carrying-case; maybe a Blickensderfer like one of these...

...whose ads emphasised its travel utility.

*****

Jonathan Harker keeps his journal in shorthand, and says so:

"Here I am, sitting at a little oak table where in old times possibly some fair lady sat to pen, with much thought and many blushes, her ill-spelt love-letter, and writing in my diary in shorthand all that has happened since I closed it last."

And he's using a pen not a pencil, because he also says so:

"When I had written in my diary and had fortunately replaced the book and pen in my pocket I felt sleepy."

He can't have done that with a regular dip pen and inkwell, so he's carrying something with an internal ink supply and a cap against leaks - in other words, a fountain pen, only finalised in its modern form in 1884.

Whether Harker's had a proper steno nib for shorthand (or whether such nibs had even been invented yet) I don't know, but the pen itself would have been something like this Swan by Mabie Todd, which he'd have filled from a bottle using an eyedropper (modern Opus 88 pens use this filling system even now):

...or maybe a Wirt fountain pen (filled the same way) as praised by Mark Twain:

*****

Finally, Dr Seward's phonograph recorder was probably an Edison like this one...

...powered by a large lead-acid battery of the kind now found in cars. The one pictured has a small close-to-the-mouth "confidential" speaking horn and pneumatic (air-transmission) earphones, appropriate to a doctor using it for confidential patient information.

It made recordings on wax-covered cylinders which could be erased for re-use by shaving off the engraved wax.

"He (Dr Seward) stood up and opened a large drawer, in which were arranged in order a number of hollow cylinders of metal covered with dark wax... I (Lucy) took the cover off my typewriter, and said to Dr. Seward: “Let me write this all out now...” He accordingly set the phonograph at a slow pace, and I began to typewrite from the beginning of the seventh cylinder..."

So "Dracula" is a novel whose plot development depends in several places on state-of-the-art contemporary tech.

That sounds like a "techno-thriller" to me... :->

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.