Avatar

Ferbie's Digs

@ferbiederbie / ferbiederbie.tumblr.com

how's it goin'
Avatar
Avatar
kaity--did

Weaponized incompetence my ass just weaponize it back. Once my dad tries to pull the “but I don’t know how to clean the counters as well as you” on my mom and she said “ok honey I’ll show you” and she made him stand in the kitchen and watch her clean the counters. Then she pulled out a bottle of chocolate syrup and proceeded to spray the entire kitchen in chocolate, hand him the sponge and said “okay now it’s your turn”

Avatar
ohbeesneeze

Weaponized Pettiness is an appropriate response to Weaponized Incompetence.

Avatar

I recently had to make an emergency move to Virginia after learning my ex-roommate was abusing my dog when I was at work. I am working on getting a job, but need assistance keeping myself afloat between then and now, so I'm now open for commissions.

Avatar
Avatar
nicolauda

Rhianna Pratchett confirming her father wouldn't be a """gender critical""" activist (whatever the hell those GCs stand for) if he were still alive

The GCs are Terfs. A specific type of transphobe. Quite a few British celebrity got recruited to their ranks and they have the money and clout to do a lot of damage unfortunately.

Terry passed away before Rowling started her downward spiral and played a significant role in creating the current toxic atmosphere around Trans rights in England . It is good to see that his daughter ,who is also a writer, stands up for human rights.

That’s despicable trying to “recruit” someone who’s DEAD. Not to mention there’s NOTHING in Pratchett’s books—including the ones of essays, articles, and speeches—to suggest he join in if he was alive.

And obviously his own kid would know his private opinions so hopefully the assholes will see her tweet and back the fuck off.

(GC stands for “gender critical”, when you see that it usually means that you’re talking to/about terfs who are trying to rebrand their image).

For those of you who are wondering who else the original tweet is referring to, they are talking about Margaret Atwood, a very prominent feminist author (probably best known for The Handmaid’s Tale). Because she is a feminist the terfs assumed that she’d naturally side with them, and it came as a massive shock (for some reason) when she very publicly opposed and humiliated all of  terfdom.

But yeah I don’t know how terfs can possibly get through Discworld books without any kind of self-awareness but apparently they do. I’ve also seen them talking about how the Wives in the Handmaid’s Tale are all trans women (solely based on the fact that they are infertile). If you know anything about the plot or even the basic premise you’ll know how ludicrous that suggestion is.

Terf rhetoric basically revolves around throwing shit at the wall and then crawling around in anything that sticks, but the underlying transphobia is always present.

Rhianna Pratchett is the best.

“Terry Pratchett” is now a trending topic on twitter and everyone is just slamming the people who claim he would be transphobic. It’s been really nice to see

Also there’s this

I’d already seen most of this on Twitter, but the Tom Hatfield tweet was new to me and got some laughs.

Also, this is the one that made me get all teary:

Avatar

I recently had surgery, and at the time I came home, I had both my cat and one of my grandma's cats staying with me.

- Within hours of surgery, I wake up from a nap to my cat gently sniffing at my incisions with great alarm.

- I was not allowed to shower the first day after surgery, and the cats, seeing that The Large Cat is not observing its cleaning ritual, decided I must be gravely disabled and compensated by licking all the exposed skin on my arms, face, and legs.

- I currently have to sleep with a pillow over my abdomen because my cat insists on climbing on top of me and covering my incisions with her body while I sleep (which is very sweet but not exactly comfortable without the pillow). She also lays across me facing my bedroom door, presumably on guard for attackers who may try to harm me while I'm sleeping and injured.

That's love. 🐈‍⬛🐈❤️

cats are so very unclear on what is wrong with us but they want to help

Last time I had a really bad migraine my cat curled herself round my head and purred sympathetically, and actually stayed there through two of her normal mealtimes. It wasn't until I was able to stagger to the kitchen and grab a protein bar for myself that she gave a very small, polite miaow to the effect of "while you're up... could you get something for me too?"

Avatar

hey good news

there's a specifically designated role in the naked mole rat ecology for "guy who runs off into the wilderness and fucks their way into a stranger's house"

Y'all have no idea how absurdly strange naked mole rats are as creatures They're cold-blooded mammals that live in a eusocial structure with a queen and drones, similar to ants, bees, termites and no other mammal on the planet. They barely need to breathe, with a respiration rate low enough to let them thrive in burrows with 2% oxygen, and survive with 0 oxygen whatsoever for about 20 minutes with zero lasting effects.

They live for over 30 years, which is absurdly long for a rodent, don't grow frail with age, and are basically immune to cancer because their telomeres just never shorten.

Naked Mole Rats are rodents that attempted to evolve into bugs, failed, and unlocked the secret to immortality in the process.

Avatar
Avatar
gahdamnpunk

When Zuko apologized to uncle Iroh in the tent cause he was so ashamed of his actions and what he’d done to the only person who unconditionally believed in his ability to do good >>>>>

So okay, I’ve given this rant before but this is another good time for it.

Structurally speaking, ATLA did something important with Zuko that, in a purely mechanistic sense of narrative development, I think a lot of people don’t notice immediately, and that even fewer people who want to emulate what was done with him get.

Which is Zuko is made a protagonist VERY early, and the show goes out of its way to continually place Zuko into situations where the audience empathizes and roots for him.

This happens in literally the second episode of the series, if we count the two-part premiere as a single episode, which I think we should. The A-plot of that episode, “The Southern Air Temple,” is Aang reckoning with the genocide of his people… but the B-plot?

The B-plot is the introduction of Zhao, and more specifically, his introduction in a way that is calculate to shift the audience, whose introduction to Zuko did NOT engender a ton of sympathy to him, directly and forcefully onto his side. They want Zuko to kick Zhao’s ass.

This continues all through book one and book two. Remember, Zuko is never, ever the main villain of this series. That’s initially Zhao, followed by Azula and Ozai. (Plus various temporary players like Long Feng.) Whenever Zuko isn’t placed into direct conflict with the other protagonists, he’s always written and presented in a way that is careful, VERY VERY careful, not to make him too monstrous, and to make us root for him. He’s placed right next to Iroh, who is designed for people to like, and that reflects back onto Zuko; we want Zuko to be better than he is because we want Iroh to have good things.

Put aside for the moment whether any specific character, including Zuko, deserves their redemption. If you’ve decided you’re going to do that, you have to erect the proper narrative scaffolding around them, and it extends to far more things than “did this person not do things that were too horrible” and “is this person genuinely sorry and is working really hard to atone.” There’s a difference between protagonist and white hat, but if you want someone to eventually wear that white hat, you REALLY need to establish them as a plausible protagonist early on.

Avatar
sqbr
ID: Screenshots of tweets. tash @sapphicshulkie: everyone wants what he had… but they’re not good enough writers. Pictures of Zuko in book 1 scowling and in book 3 smiling. If Beale Street Could Twerk @camerouninema: The thing is Zuko spent 50 episodes earning his redemption and they made sure he learned very harshly the consequences of his actions and he was deeply deeply sorry. Most villain redemptions are… not that

Ohhh interesting. I partly disagree but this has clarified something for me.

Like the stuff about fleshing the character out properly, having them not be TOO monstrous, having things happen which make them look sympathetic etc, sure. All that definitely works together to make Zuko more likable to me.

But I’m less sure about him being a semi-protagonist from so early. And it hadn’t occurred to me that some people just Cannot connect with antagonists who are not initially framed as (semi-)protagonists, and so to them it’s bad writing to not do this. For me, having a character come out of left field as a protagonist is a feature not a bug.

Avatar
anghraine

It’s fine to be influenced by how characters are framed and prefer narratives which suit your preferences. But I wish people were better at drawing a line between “suits my preferences”, “inherently good writing”, and “inherently morally superior character”.

I strongly agree (and the argument the Twitter OP makes is one I find intensely annoying and simplistic tbh). Not every redemption arc has to be Zuko’s all over again. Not every redemption arc has to even resemble Zuko’s in its structure or goals.

For me, the most obvious character to contrast him with is Catra from the new She-Ra. One of the things I really admired about Catra’s arc is that it doesn’t completely take the Zuko path.

Zuko, whatever his flaws, is one of the most sympathetic Fire Nation characters in the show, contrasted with much worse people he’s linked to or contrasted against, and clearly marked as hero material from early on in ways that make him easy to like. But Catra, for much of her arc, is a more difficult personality. She’s surrounded by Team Villain characters who are considerably nicer and arguably better-intentioned than she is (e.g. Scorpia, Entrapta, even Kyle and Rogelio and Lonnie).

Certainly her redemption isn’t unexpected, and the narrative does work to build sympathy for her in other ways (see: Shadow Weaver). But once Shadow Weaver leaves the Horde early in the show (to spend the rest of the series cooperating with the heroes), Catra is frequently the most toxic Horde figure around apart from Hordak himself.

One thing that is getting me about this is the need I keep seeing in commentary from others to fit Zuko nearly into a specific slot at the start of the story: he’s either an antagonist, or a (semi-)protagonist, or a villain, or, or,

But the reality is that Zuko is multiple things all at once. He is an antagonist, he’s an anti-villain, and he is (arguably most importantly) the show’s deuteragonist. He is all of these things at once. He wears several hats. This is what makes his character so compelling, his arc so successful, and it’s why we are still arguing over it and how Bryke even did that magic to this day.

The two-part pilot episode introduces us to Zuko as an antagonist, and the The Storm introduces is up Zuko as an anti-villain. These three episodes combined introduce us to Zuko as THE deuteragonist: Aang’s deuteragonist, the character whose journey at various points parallels, mirrors, and finally intersects with throughout the show.

This is why “redemption” is only one small facet of Zuko’s full character arc, and I don’t think the redemptive element can fully be explored from a meta perspective unless we’re all willing to unpack what we mean, individually, by redemption. Zuko IS on a quest for redemption at the start of the show - to redeem himself in his father’s eyes, by capturing the Avatar. And within his own arc, under Ozai’s dominion, Zuko always had more elements of heroism than villainy. What Zuko needed from Ozai wasn’t redemption, but self-determination and freedom.

In his arc with Aang, within Zuko’s role as deuteragonist - this has always been about Zuko’s capacity for heroism growing to work in tandem with Aang’s own. Zuko was always on his own hero’s journey running in a parallel circle alongside Aang’s.

Avatar
Avatar
yimra

Marvel Syndrome

Josh Whedon disease

so uh. Ursula Vernon is an acclaimed and accomplished writer (also known as T Kingfisher) of multiple genres, including fantasy and horror - lots of horror. she also wrote and illustrated the award-winning webcomic Digger. I knew this screenshot couldn’t be showing us her whole opinion, so I pulled up the actual tweet, and I was right! she goes on to explain that many in her crowd loved it, including her husband, but that it wasn’t for her. even more relevant than her original thread, though, is this response she had to someone who was asking in (apparently) good faith why she found the lack of humour frustrating:

like. yeah. not every movie requires a comedy element. of course not! but I think this post is ripping unfairly on entirely the wrong person. Vernon was clear in her original thread that being humourless did not make it a Bad Movie, and has been exceptionally straightforward about why that lack of humour felt detrimental to the film in her experience.

Avatar
lorbanery

I can't speak to Dune because I've never read it or watched any of the adaptations, but I want to add another point to the "movies/media should have SOME humor in them" Discourse.

Having characters joke around with each other, even in tense moments, even in genres that are about tension, even in Very Serious Pieces of Media, gives your characters a sense of camaraderie. And the type of joking they do can get across to the audience how well they know each other and what their relationship is without saying it (or can back up what they say). If they're actively teasing each other and making in-jokes about shared experiences, it shows/reinforces that they're friends or partners who've known each other for a while, they feel comfortable lightheartedly ribbing each other, and they have a deep well of embarrassing/funny moments to draw from. If they're making more general jokes that aren't about the person, but still referencing shared experiences, they may have known each other for a while, but aren't necessarily friends, maybe they're coworkers or classmates or a regular at a restaurant and their preferred server. If they're making more general jokes without references, they probably only recently met and have had generally positive interactions, or they might be complete strangers who are just trying to break the ice.

Going back to the "friends who have known each other for a long time and are comfortable ribbing each other and have a lot of material" for a moment, specifically in the context of things like horror and dramatic epics like I understand Dune to be? When you have characters who joke around with each other like that, when one or both of those characters stop joking? It can also help prime the audience to understand, "Oh shit, shit's getting real now."

Like, think about Merry and Pippin in Lord of the Rings. Both of them spend a lot of time joking around with each other and the other characters, even when they're on their way to Mordor. Both of them lose the jokes the moment things get dangerous, but are back at it when the tension's released again. In Fellowship, the jokes pretty much stop the moment they get chased into Moria and don't come back until they've come to terms with Gandalf's death enough to move on from Lothlorien. They're back to it until they get attacked by the Uruk-hai, then back to their shared mischievousness again once they once they figure out how to convince Treebeard to rally the Ents and attack Isengard and are fully joking around again by the time Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli catch up with them in the aftermath of the battle.

Then, everything goes to shit. Pippin consistently shows himself to be the kind of person who doesn't quite grasp the potential danger of things and places that he hasn't experienced himself. The combination of that alongside his natural curiosity leads to things like him fiddling with the arrow in the dwarf skeleton that overbalances it into the well it was perched on, alerting the goblins and balrog to their presence. And to him sneaking a peak at the palantir. In the moments after, when Gandalf is readying things to take Pippin with him to Gondor, Merry, who's been able to, if not fully grasp the gravity of what they've been doing, at least trust their companions' assessments, listen to what their saying and read between the lines. And we finally see the seriousness and danger of the situation really sink in for Pippin.

He's seen Sauron, had him in his head, he's not just a vague concept of a Bad Guy off in a part of the world that may not exist for all that it's effected Pippin before leaving the Shire. He's seen how scared Frodo's been, seen the danger he's been in because of the ring, and now there's a possibility that Sauron thinks Pippin has the ring. Even when they left their home, Pippin still had Merry and Frodo and Sam. But then things got too dangerous for Frodo to stay so he left and Sam went with him. Now, things are so dangerous, that Pippin has to leave his very best friend and, after all they've been through, it's hitting him that he might not ever see any of them again.

This is the moment where all the jokes stop. Pippin has moments of joy and happiness and relief and satisfaction. But we never get to see being that mischievous little jokester again. I hesitate to call it character growth, because that phrase usually implies a positive change from immaturity and/or selfishness into a character with more empathy and a sense of responsibility towards other characters. Because I would argue that Pippin already had those traits. He saw that Frodo and Sam were in trouble literally moments after he and Merry ran into them leaving the Shire and he didn't hesitate to help them escape. He fought his best in every battle he found himself in, attempted to avenge Boromir against enemies he knew far overpowered him. The change from the beginning of Fellowship to the end of Return of the King wasn't character growth, it is, and was framed as, a young man forever changed by the horrors he witnessed and experiences, horrors he never could have even imagined before leaving his home, but now weigh in his memories for the rest of his life.

And you get that narrative because of the way the humor is used in Lord of the Rings.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.