a character from a Fiasco campaign I played with some friends a long time ago. His name is Ace Diamond

sketch under the cut. I might eventually finish this, bc i really like how the sketch turned out.

Keep reading

MIDNIGHT RADIO EPISODE 3: VANISH

A transcript of this episode can be found here.

If you like the show, please reblog, subscribe, and review.

Episode Three is here!!

Did I trick you into thinking I didn’t write something sad? I did. I did write something sad.

Hello there, friends and listeners! Are you excited for the launch of Midnight Radio? Here’s something to get you more excited – this gorgeous cover art is by @cornenslart, one of our amazing actors! Episode One, “Letter,” will be released on June 10th.

You can subscribe to Midnight Radio right now on iTunes, on Google Play, or at our RSS feed. You can also follow us on Twitter at @martletradio.

We are thrilled to announce that Episode One of Midnight Radio will be released on Sunday, June 10th.

You can subscribe to Midnight Radio now on iTunes and Google Play, and at our RSS feed. For updates, follow us here on Tumblr or on Twitter! Please subscribe and share the word, and don’t forget: you’ll hear from us again soon.

Content warning: this audio contains static.

i found a friend @riskystandard

pryce-and-carter --> riskystandard

ignore the paint on my hand

I’ve got a Vibe today

(Foster • he/him)

Okay I love them, I LOVE them, you know I do, but I cannot listen to these people talk about queerbaiting in the AMAs.

Keep reading

Yeah, so, this post resonates so much that it seems a good place to note that the one thing I find intensely frustrating about Gabriel’s writing/direction is his insistence on ambiguity for basic facts about his characters. And I absolutely GET and LOVE that it’s not a show with any romance in it, but actually my queerness is really important to me and my self-identity and place in the world, and that’s the case when I’m not flirting with anyone. I would be uncomfortable with people I’m close with not knowing I’m queer. And that’s just me, I know, but refusing to have sexuality ever ever come up over this really intense period of time in this really close group of people… is so fucking straight. 

(I get why Jacobi wouldn’t share that until he finally, finally decided he might be on the same team as the rest of them. But to do the same with the other characters is not justified. Unless they’re all straight, which is the only case in which it would never come up. And that is not ambiguity.

You. can’t. have. both.)

Yes, yes, yes. Exactly!!! I get and love the lack of romance too. And I really get that frustration with the insistence on ambiguity. They are not ambiguous about anything else! They do a monthly hour and a half long AMA where they talk about the character’s favorite foods and favorite drinks and D&D personas! It is just these things. Ambiguity in this, as with all identities, is going to cause the audience to default away from any marginalized identities.

“You can’t have both” is exactly what it feels like from this side of the speakers. thank you for adding this to the post!

I don’t watch the AMAs, but this is so frustrating to hear. Especially because the show is over. How hard would it be for them to pull a JKR and be all “yeah everyone’s queer,” or “xyz are queer.” What the heck do they have to lose at this point? I’m very pro “death of the author” about this which is why I have no desire to watch the AMAs anyway, which might be the old school fangirl in me wanting creators to go away and let me have my fun, but honestly, how hard would it be for Gabriel to say, “Yeah Jacobi was totally in love with Kepler, and Kepler strung Jacobi along because he’s an asshole and probably he didn’t know what his own feelings on the subject were because he’s allergic to feelings and the truth.”

I would be so fine with that sentence. (To note, it’s my own personal HC, but whatever) but I think it would mean so much to listeners to even have that.

Again, I don’t watch the AMAs, but have they answered any ?s about Lovelace’s sexuality?

People ask them every month and every month the answer is “we aren’t talking about that.” They’re incredibly tired of hearing the question, it’s… actually getting pretty uncomfortable. (And I get that, too. They’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t–if they don’t answer, everyone will complain about not getting an answer, if they JKR it everyone will say “you were too cowardly to write it into the show.”)

I also am super pro death of the author, but I’m the type of fan who wants to know what everyone’s canon favorite ice cream flavor is. It was just so frustrating in that moment, because Zach Valenti, who I have a lot of respect for(!!!!!! this is really, really not me bashing the creators!!!!), turned to the camera and was like “I don’t know what queerbaiting is,” and kind of went on to describe his idea of what it meant from context, which is the point at which I kind of paused it and wrote up that whole post, because that’s when I realized that it sounds like what the writers are hearing is “it was MEAN to not include more gay characters!!! It was mean to make Jacobi and Kepler each other’s favorite person and then not make them in love!”

Which of course, yeah, if that’s what you’re hearing, seems like a pretty darn irrational thing to say. But it’s just not what was being said.

yesssss to this. it hurts when the creators keep saying “we don’t talk about their sexualities because we don’t want to focus on romance/sexual identity/whatever” as if being queer or being trans is only relevant if characters are kissing. and it’s especially disingenuous to do so while providing backstory/context for central characters that involves male/female relationships. minkowski has a husband; eiffel has a child with a woman. those relationships may not be central to the narrative, but they impact the characters and their choices in tangible ways. to depict those relationships while not creating space for any analagous same-gender relationships reveals an unacknowledged heteronormativity underlying the narrative choices.

minkowski and eiffel are not stated to be straight, and they could certainly be bi, or pan, or trans, or ace…..but the only thing we know is that minkowski loves a man and eiffel loved a woman. their is no canonical depiction of them being anything other than straight. that isn’t representation. meanwhile, for queer representation, we have fisher, who is the first character to die in the chronology of the show, and jacobi, who is never depicted in any kind of romantic and/or sexual relationship, and who only mentions his sexuality once. that isn’t on par with how relationships between men and women are portrayed. and in the absence of meaningful queer representation, heterocisnormativity is implicit. when the only relationships mentioned in relation to central characters are “straight,” queerness is not afforded space.

I love wolf 359 so much, but silence does not serve as queer representation. in our struggle to have our love, our desire, our existence recognized and respected, we have always had to fight against silence. against absence. against nonexistence. we have had to be loud. because where our existence is not spoken, straightness and cisness become the default.

Foster (he/him)✌🏻

mulberry 🎶

(portrait of @pryce-and-carter)