>"In Israel" is also "their homeland" so that's not really a distinction.
I feel like you're nitpicking a sentence fragment without actually disputing the overall point.
>Also, if we're not ignoring the history of Hamas's attacks then there's no reason to ignore the history of Israel's attacks and the constant state of violence that is decades of occupation or siege.
I don't think you realize my first point was "both sides have killed innocent people on the other side, and that fact alone makes the relative morality a lot greyer than OP would like to pretend."
OP implies the attack that destroyed the area in the first picture came out of nowhere. Hamas regularly launches rockets at civilians from civilian areas.
Israels choices are a) ignore them and let Hamas kill their people to no productive end, or b) try and strike back, and risk civilian casualties.
OP is also implying any and all Palestinian actions as adults are justified because bad things happened to them as kids. You didn't address that point.
Not to mention the implication that Palestinian fighters are regularly dressed as soldiers, which isn't exactly the case.
>Obviously Hamas is a terrorist group and should be condemned for their attacks on civilians.
And yet many pro-Palestine people fail to do even that. I have literally asked many of them. Directly. They refused, stopped responding, or both.
Others did what I suspect you are about to, which is "NO U" at Israel.
>But so were many Israeli terrorist groups and so is their descendant the IDF. State action is no less terroristic or immoral just because it's stamped with an official seal.
Good thing I never said or implied otherwise! As you might've gleaned from the fact that I'm criticizing Hamas, a nominal government.
I'm going to stop now, because this post is already long enough.