Avatar

Sachi's Thoughts

@sachinighte

Random stuff, whatever seems interesting to me.
I am Biromantic Greysexual, woman, pronouns she/her.
All my works of fiction can be found either at or through my Ao3 account. My header image is courtesy of @aestheticlgbtq. My avatar is from: Picrew KZ’s Dolls maker https://picrew.me/share?cd=HEHL2354hf
Avatar
reblogged

I offer custom hand knitted entrelac neckwarmers and pillows in any pride flag or colour scheme you want, in addition to the ones I currently have already made and posted for sale! Neckwarmers are $50 and pillows are $75.

Shipping is not included in prices. International shipping is not currently available through my shop, but I can and do ship internationally – just message me about it and pay me directly through paypal once I can get you a shipping estimate!

Avatar
reblogged

honored by the kind words of asexual buds just now learning about my NOT POUNDED BY series. you should know that while BURY YOUR GAYS is a love letter to fandom and creation, it is also for my ace buds and a rallying cry for ace validity in queer spaces

that is not an AFTERTHOUGHT with the book. when i set out to write BURY YOUR GAYS i was specifically thinking about the ace buckaroos who trotted with chuck and helped guide me through the first few NOT POUNDED BY BOOKS. i wanted to write something to honor their fight

Avatar
Avatar
toiletpotato

Here are the information pages for the legislators that introduced this bill. There is relevant contact information at each link:

At this time I am unable to find a contact script or anything of that nature thus if you do reach out to them it may be best to discuss the parts of the bill you disagree with and why. It should be mentioned all four of them are old, white, Republican men.

Find your representative here and ask them to oppose it! Here's a simple script to use:

Hi, my name is (name) and I am a constituent of (representative) living in (city). I would like to ask (representative) to oppose House Bill 237.

You can add reasoning if you like, but it's not necessary. For example, I said I work with children and mask so that I and others don't get sick. They will note down the bill and your stance and pass along how many people called to support or oppose it.

Avatar
anarchapella

Y’all this is about repressing liberation movements.

it is important to note that this is a bill being proposed in North Carolina's General Assembly. if you live in North Carolina, you should absolutely protest this bill (like I will be doing). if you do not live in North Carolina, then the House of Representatives link posted above does nothing.

Again, this is a bill in North Carolina. Is it fucking horrific? Absolutely. But this requires more localized resistance. This bill was also introduced in March 2023, to be brought back on the docket again in response to the very public protests against Israel's genocide in Palestine, at state universities like UNC Chapel Hill, Charlotte, etc.

Avatar
arctic-hands

Can someone caption the document part for accessibility I can't read it all on my phone

[ID: a legislative bill (?) with the header that reads: "House Bill 237: Unmasking Mobs and Criminals."

A section below the header reads:

2023-2024 General Assembly Committee: Senate Judiciary. If favorable, re-refer to Rules Date: and Operations of the Senate Introduced by: Reps. Torbett, Greene, Faircloth, Carson Smith Analysis of: PCS to Third Edition H237-CSCE-38 Date: May 7, 2024 Prepared by: Robert Ryan, Michael Johnston Committee Co-Counsel

End of section.

A new header that reads: "OVERVIEW: The Proposed Committee Substitute (PCS) for House Bill 237 would do the following:" This is followed by a bullet point list.

  • Repeal the health and safety exemption from certain laws prohibiting the wearing of masks in public.
  • Enhance the criminal punishment if the defendant wears a mask to conceal the defendant's identity during the commission of another crime.
  • Prevent the executive branch or local governments from distinguishing between religious institutions and other entities during an emergency.
  • Impose criminal and civil liability on individuals who obstruct emergency vehicles during demonstrations.

End of bullet list.

A new header that reads: "SECTION 1"

Under Article 4A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, it is generally a crime for an individual to wear a mask in public. However, under G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), an individual can wear a mask in public for the physical health or safety of the wearer or others. If an individual wears a mask in public for health or safety reasons, a law enforcement officer can require the individual to remove the mask during traffic stops and criminal investigations when the officer has reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

Section 1 of the PCS would repeal G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), and individuals would no longer be able to wear masks in public for health or safety reasons.

Section 1 would become effective when it becomes law, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date. [End Image ID]

Thank you friend!

Avatar

Consider this (based on a conversation I had with some friends a while ago): Pride and Prejudice and Zombies for people who actually like Pride and Prejudice. Look–I tried to read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and I got about 20 pages in before I came to the conclusion that the person who wrote it did so out of the belief that the original Pride and Prejudice was stuffy and boring. There were out of character vulgar puns. And the trailer for the movie did not convince me that I had missed anything by cutting short my reading experience. So, what I’m talking about here is this premise: the world of Pride and Prejudice, but if you die, it’s highly likely, almost certain that your corpse will get up and try to eat people. But no one dies in Pride and Prejudice, you might say. In fact, few or no people die in any Jane Austen novel. This is true. But people do get sick with some regularity. Imagine the tension added to Jane getting sick after going to visit Bingley if there was the chance that she would become a zombie after she died. Becoming a zombie in an eligible bachelor’s house probably would have seriously wrecked any chances of any of the living sisters ending up with him. Imagine Mr. Collins, as a minister, having the duty upon someone’s death of severing their head with a ceremonial plate or something that would prevent the corpse from rising. Obviously important, but this only makes him more self-important and obnoxious. And dangerous. For you see, in this version, Mr. Bennett, who stays in his office all the time, whose life is the only thing allowing Mrs. Bennett and her daughters to stay in the house–Mr. Bennett is definitely a zombie. He died at home, and Mrs. Bennett decided that, no way were they dealing with this, and so…just started faking it. Jane and Elizabeth know. The younger sisters don’t. In this universe, I think we have to go with zombies that are not any faster or stronger than the humans they were, and in fact tend to get weaker as time passes because their flesh is rotting. And…hmm, okay, how about they are pretty violent upon rising, and for about a week afterward, trying to bite people and spread the infection (even though most people are carriers anyway, but getting a nasty bite from a corpse will give you other stuff that will have you die while carrying the virus). But then they calm down and basically just start sort of attempting to act like they did in life, that is, taking habitual actions with no consciousness, in a depressing and desiccated way. So Mr. Bennett is a zombie, and Mrs. Bennett’s number one goal is to get her daughters married before anyone finds that out. And this, actually, makes Elizabeth’s refusal of Mr. Collins more frustrating for Mrs. Bennett–obviously Mr. Bennett didn’t tell Elizabeth that she could refuse Mr. Collins, because Mr. Bennett is dead, but Mrs. Bennett can’t say anything or the game would be up. Another question in this version–does Mr. Darcy find out about Mr. Bennett being a zombie somehow? Does Elizabeth find out that he knows and didn’t say anything and this is something that helps repair his earlier actions? Anyway, this is the Pride and Prejudice and Zombies that I was looking for.

Avatar
exigencelost

Okay also: in the original, when Elizabeth walks through the rain all the way to bingley’s to care for Jane while she’s sick, it’s a very dramatic expression of both Elizabeth’s love for her sister and her penchant for flamboyant rebellion, but consider, if there is a chance Jane will wake up a zombie and Elizabeth knows it, how does that change the dynamic? Elizabeth might be going to help take care of Jane, or to *take care* of Jane should things take a more morbid turn…by killing her zombie sister.

This works especially well if zombieism is communicable prior to death; if mr. Bennett is a zombie and only the elder Bennetts know, that means Jane has been pre-exposed and is almost certain to wake up as a zombie should she die in the Bingleys’ care— which the Bingleys do not know. Elizabeth has to forge through the rain to be there in case things get ugly, because she knows that the Bingleys aren’t prepared.

Avatar
shenzuul

And I think you pretty much HAVE to make Mr. Bennett’s zombie status play a role in how and why Darcy separates Bingley from Jane—the heavy implication behind Darcy’s line about the want of propriety shown even by her father hits Elizabeth like a ton of bricks as she realizes he knows—he knows, and he thought Jane lying to Bingley about it was evidence that Jane didn’t love Bingley—but—but Darcy must not have told Bingley that part of it. Bingley couldn’t keep a secret on his life; if he knew, his sister would know, and word would already be out and they’d have been ruined by now—

And of course, not only does the fact that Darcy, who owes their family nothing, has kept and continues to keep this secret for them even after Elizabeth’s refusal deepen the gratitude she begins to feel for him after the letter of explanation, but it also liberates Elizabeth to fall in love with him. Because Elizabeth-who-wants-to-marry-for-love would never be happy marrying someone who didn’t know the family secret in advance. She had resigned herself to spinsterhood because she couldn’t be satisfied with having to hoodwink someone to have their hand, but also couldn’t put her family at risk by trusting someone who wasn’t bound to them by more than an engagement. (Maybe she was even tempted to confide in Wickham at one point, and hasn’t Darcy’s letter proven she was absolutely right not to yield to that passing thought.) But Darcy figured it out himself, and he’s kept her trust, and she could fall in love with him without guilt—if she hadn’t already turned him down.

AND THEN LYDIA HAPPENS. And Darcy realizes immediately that Mr. Bennett can’t do anything to recover her—and if Mr. Bennett doesn’t do anything about Lydia, Mr. Collins might become suspicious, or even just officously involve himself, so find out the while thing. When Darcy blames himself for not revealing Wickham’s character, it’s with a much more immediate sense of urgency. It’s not that the other sisters’ marriage prospects being ruined may impoverish them down the road—it might immediately drag them all into destitution. That’s why he rushes off to go look for Lydia himself.

I credit Pride and Prejudice and Zombies with exactly one thing: making me realize that I would probably really like the actual story, and getting me into Jane Austen. But wow, this would be SO much better.

Avatar

people do correctly identify that laios is autistic fairly often but a lot of the reasoning begins and ends with his special interest and social difficulties, but honestly it goes far deeper into the build of his character than just those two things

his pain tolerance is wildly inconsistent, unable to tolerate a drop of hot oil (or any heat) but able to shrug off both his leg being bitten off and it being reattached

hes sensory seeking in the extreme. he rubs the bat bones against his face, pets and fluffs the shapeshifter tail.

his desire to eat monsters comes from three very autistic places. 1) the rules for why monsters are not okay to eat but animals are are arbitrary to him so he cannot follow them easily: he cannot understand the 'feelings' argument others make. 2) this too is a sensory seeking behavior. he wants to experience these new things, new flavors and new textures. 3) it completes his knowledge of the monster in question to also have data on its edibility. because he cannot draw that arbitrary line around all monsters, he wants to evaluate them case-by-case and see if real patterns emerge. butchering and eating the monsters improves his knowledge of them greatly and highlights their importance in their ecosystem, as well as making him a part of that same ecosystem

he cannot emote the way others expect him to. he compartmentalizes his feelings (to an unhealthy degree) because he needs a pragmatic solution. so as long as there is a problem to solve, that matters far more than evaluating his emotions and allowing himself to experience them. while this is also a coping mechanism for ptsd, it is a trait found in many autistic people regardless of trauma, as we have trouble sorting the feelings we have and often need time to think about what we feel, so it becomes easier to simply not do it and pretend we dont need to. laios emotions certainly affect him, with or without his processing them, but others do not see what they expect to see and thus dismiss that he is feeling what they would feel

he is incredibly gifted with pattern recognition, observation, and analysis within realms he understands. to understand subjects that dont come easily to him, he must filter them through his established schema (his special interest--this is why they are so special! they help us sort the world). when he isnt sure about the social cues and details hes observed in the shapeshifter arc, he filters it through the lens he understands best: monsters. he was making correct observations about his friends all along, but he could not be confident in that the way he was about their behavior when it came to his interest (chilchucks caution, senshis passions, and marcilles carelessness)

Avatar

Guys gals non binary pals I tried so fuckin hard to find this and finally here it is

is it queer to use a different language than english?

Ja.

Avatar
janokenmun

lon

نعم

はい

ydy

כן

Да.

Da.

opo

हाँ

sic

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.