Avatar

the source of miracles

@yaboylevi / yaboylevi.tumblr.com

{DON'T REPOST MY ORIGINAL CONTENT, translations included} Vivi | main: @yeagerboys | selling snk merch on Instagram @teacupkey. art blog @UC33BG. Buy me a Ko-fi if you like what I do and would like to support me <3
Avatar

PSA [edited again after reading the final chapter]: I am done with SnK. It doesn’t spark joy. It doesn’t spark any emotion, actually (other than some very negative ones in passing). So what does this mean for this blog?

- I won’t reply to snk-related asks anymore. I don’t wanna engage in conversations about the series anymore. The inbox is open mainly for anyone else who wants to talk about other stuff. That is very welcome, actually!

- I won’t reblog many snk posts anymore, if at all, I blocked all the tags so I cannot see anything related to it.

That out of the way, feel free to unfollow, I don’t mind. Thanks for sticking around until now, even though my blog hasn’t been the best this past year or so.

※ If you have any questions that need an immediate reply from me, chances are I have already replied, so you can look for them on my blog. I have a tag page, a post where I explain a bit more my tagging system, and this post for those cringy-af frequently asked questions.

Avatar
reblogged

The fact that the “Yoo Joonghyuk from the 0th turn was willing to go through 1864 regressions solely to see Kim Dokja again” notion is so popular kinda irks me because of how it 1) strips YJH of any nuance in his character by reducing him to a pining lovesick man 2) kinda disregards an arguably more heartfelt reading of the scene

To clarify, I’m not gonna argue that YJH did not consider KDJ in his decision to regress, he evidently did, but it drives me nuts when people act like that’s the only reason why YJH regressed.

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

saw your monster meta when i was searching through the tumblr tag. how did you understand johan's perfect suicide, and why did he come to such a conclusion?

Hello anon!

I am happy you read my meta and came here to ask!

I think that my meta on Johan, Nina and Tenma partly answers you:

These repetitive actions give birth to a pattern Johan himself is unable to leave. He is trapped in his own past and so he keeps reproducing it together with the fairy tales he used to read as a child.
This behaviour underlines a contradiction Johan has. On one hand he wants to develop relationships with others and this is why he keeps searching for new parental figures. On the other hand he is not able to properly have relationships which are not manipulative or exploitative. All in all he is never able to make “the monster inside of him” rest. This restless monster who keeps getting stronger is not really his violent side, as Nina thinks at first, but it is nothing more than the emptiness he feels because he does not really understand who he is. He can’t give any meaning to his life and so he keeps searching for one, does not find it, accepts nihilism and repeats. In a sense, he fails in his search because he has already given up on it before starting it. He has already accepted the vision of the doomsday:
Wolf sees it before dying and calls it the land of the nameless.Having a name in the story is symbolic of having an identity and this means mostly that someone knows you. If nobody can’t call your name, then you do not really exist and there is no proof of your existence. Relationships with others define the person to an extent and the land of the nameless is a dimension where all these relationships are lost and the individual is alone in front of nothing. It is a place full of solitude. This landscape is symbolic of Johan’s mind and of his vision of the world.

In short, Johan is a nihilistic character and his perfect suicide is just another declination of this nihilism.

Monster is a masterpiece on all levels, but I think its strongest part are its themes. The story’s main theme is the value of life. This topic is often treated superficially in stories. It is either discarded for a pragmatic approach or conveyed in a simplicistic and moralistic way. Monster manages to treat it honestly and to convey a strong and harsh narrative about it.

It all starts with this question: “Are all lives equal?”

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.