And I mean, on a certain level I can even get why it would make them think of the Israel/Palestine conflict.
The most climactic confrontation of the film features imagery of aerial bombardment and horrified civilians suffering & fleeing mass destruction, in a sequence that ends with the death of the firstborn.
*I* thought of the Israel/Palestine conflict watching this scene this Pesach.
But I think their reading of this story as โZionistโโhere meaning, to them, genocidally Jewish-Supremacistโpartially stems from the exact fundamental misreading of the text (both the story as it appears in the Torah and on screen) that made them like it in the first placeโaside from the obvious bigotry.
In this reading of the film, initially it was plainly and only a story of justified retribution & fighting for freedom by any means necessary. The Plagues are The Revolution. Now, this narrative is reframed: it is still a story presenting itself as justified retribution, but it is trying to justify the unjustifiable: innocent civilians and children killed for the sake of a Jewish Return to Zion.
Theyโre so close to getting the point and yet so far. Rather than engage with the discomfort that this reframing causes them, and questioning either their reading of the film or their understanding of the war in Gaza, they avoid the question & vilify it as โZionistโ.
But The Prince of Egypt defies this simplistic reading, in either direction. The Egyptiansโ pain and anguish during the Plagues are not framed as some uncomplicated triumph. The core framing of this film that separates it from the Torah narrative is the emphasis on Mosesโ identity and heart being torn between his love for Egypt and the Hebrews.
There is no catharsis in Mosesโ eyes as he surveys all this destruction. Only lamentation:
This was my home. All this pain and devastation, how it tortures me inside.
Itโs a truly awesome scene, in the biblical sense, but this is not a kick-ass heroic moment where Moses is punishing the bad guys.
In this scene so much attention is payed to the Egyptian experience of the plagues. Look at the confusion and fear on this childโs face as they meet Mosesโ eye and tell me this is a black-and-white โHebrews Good, Egyptians Badโ hero narrative.
All the innocent who suffer from your stubbornness and pride.
The point is not โThe Pure & Good Hebrews are mounting a Glorious Revolution/Self Defense campaign against the Terrible Evil Egyptiansโ.
Moses isnโt a mage casting fireball on Egypt; his staff has no real power on its own. Itโs an act of G-d, and G-d is here a force of nature outside of the narrative: fire and storm clouds, water, snakes, frogs, insects, famine, disease, darkness, and death itself. The Egyptians blame Moses for acts of nature, but he is merely a vehicle and a witness to this.
The point is that when a ruler reigns with stubbornness & pride instead of humility & justice, and only doubles down & hardens his heart, the people suffer. Not just the people he oppresses. His own people.
And when confronted with this narrative, does screenshotted OOP internalize it? Do they even engage with it? No. They double down; they let their heart be hardened, and never mind how high the cost may grow.