You make a good appeal, but it doesn’t have basis in canon fact.
- “Gradual withdrawal would mean more innocent people bledso Sam could continue to safely get his ‘fix’.”
Not really, though? Sam almost exclusively drank Ruby’s blood. Her vessel’s soul had already gone on to heaven. She was the only occupant of that body, and she consented to giving him her blood, going as far as using emotional manipulation to make sure he didn’t continue with his choice (in early s4) to stop drinking it.
Sam has self control. Canonically, he would not have “made innocent people bleed” so he could get a “fix.” He gave in only twice, to my memory (correct me if I’m wrong), both times in extreme circumstances.
He sucked blood from a shallow cut on a demon’s neck in “The Rapture” and immediately used (considering how quickly the withdrawal came on) all of the power he gained from the blood on exorcising the demon in Amelia Novak.
In fact, the only thing that made him drink blood again from anyone other than Ruby (even though two hunters literally force-fed him blood in an attempt to kickstart his addiction) was Famine’s power, which reduced even Castiel to gorging mindlessly on raw meat. It forced lovers to eat each other.
Yet Sam drank a very limited amount of blood, used it only to keep the demons from killing him, and then, in Famine’s ACTUAL presence, which made everyone else mindless with need for fulfillment, Sam not only rejected Famine’s offer of blood from all the demons in the room, but used what little power he had left to take Famine out.
Gradual withdrawal wouldn’t have meant Sam would have drank from other people.
In fact, I’m not even advocating gradual withdrawal. I’m advocating treating Sam like a human being.
I’m saying that lying to a person, forcing them into a room and locking them in, and leaving them with nothing but a bucket for a toilet and a (possible?) pitcher of water (which Sam couldn’t even reach because he was so wracked with withdrawal) is outright inhumane, no matter how you slice it. In my previous post, I linked a couple meta about how to help a person detox; they’re here and here, if you’re interested. I never said or implied that the detox should have been gradual. I only said Sam should have been treated like a human being.
But the assumption that Sam would have consumed the blood of “innocents” and that Dean and Bobby forced a detox without Sam’s knowledge and consent only in order to protect innocents is highly flawed.
(We’re not even going to talk about how Dean was indiscriminately knifing innocents all season with Ruby’s knife, and how Sam originally drank blood because he didn’t want to use the knife and actually wanted to cause minimal harm to vessels. Oops, I talked about it.)
- Maybe that’s more humane to Sam, but it’s hardly humane in general.
No, I’m afraid it’s straight-up humane. Even something like a gradual withdrawal would not have endangered innocents, based on what we see from Sam in canon.
Sam was not a threat to the general populace. In fact, he had shown in the past that he was able to refuse demon blood and detox himself from it. Dean was angry at Sam after the events of “The Rapture,” and it culminated in forcing him into a detox that would have been fatal and telling Sam, through the bars of the panic room, that he was “weak,” “desperate,” and “pathetic.”
Sam stopped drinking blood for between 1 and 2 months in early season 4, and only started because Ruby blamed his wishy-washy “morality” for putting humans at risk in “Criss Angel is a Douchebag.” She said his selfish choice to not drink blood meant that people would die because of him. He bought it hook, line, and sinker, unfortunately.
Reggie and Tim forced Sam down to the ground and poured blood in his mouth in 5.03. He spat it right back out.
Sam actually showed more control and restraint than anyone could expect from a person addicted to any substance, illegal drug or supernatural stimulant, and the argument you presented doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.