imprecisescience reblogged
That’s got to be only known deaths though, right? Which is terrifying, cuz Ebola and those damned sharks are hardly capable of killing without causing a media ruckus. The police, on the other hand...
On the Texas Shooting Tonight:
The major news outlets are all reporting on a shooting that occurred outside an event in Texas today (Sunday) night and they’ve got the facts; but they’re twisting them. All that anyone seems to know is that the shooting occurred outside an American Freedom Defense Initiative Meeting and that two men (possibly the shooters) are dead and that, while no one else seems to have died, one security guard was injured.
The supposed story as it’s being spun,however, is that the gunmen were two Muslims protesting a ‘free speech’ event because it included a contest for drawing the Prophet Mohammad. This might or might not be true, BUT this is what they’re decidedly glossing over:
-- the group hosting the event (the American Freedom Defense Initiative) is an extremist anti-Islam group which has been labeled a hate group. They’re also known as SIOA-- Stop Islamization of America.
-- the ‘drawing contest’ was a ‘cartoon’ contest. whatever that means.
--There’s no proof so far that the two men killed by the police were actually the shooters
Let’s assume they probably were though. Even so:
-- There’s no proof they were rioting against this particular event.
-- There’s really no proof the gunmen were Muslim
It’s too early to tell what is and isn’t true in regards to the shooting. My only point is: This story is being skewed in a very obvious way and some skepticism wouldn’t go amiss.
imprecisescience reblogged
Cecily Strong at the 2015 White House Correspondents’ Dinner
Other topics that are probably not relevant when talking about Hillary Clinton:
- her maternal instinct (or supposed lack thereof,)
- sexist insults
- her femininity (or lack thereof)
- her marriage to Bill Clinton
-support she’s gotten (supposedly only as a result of being married to Bill Clinton)
- Bill Clinton
imprecisescience reblogged
The side of the Baltimore riots you won’t see on TV:
On Monday, the media was quick to paint a single picture of Baltimore: a chaos scene of violence and mayhem filled with images of looting, rioting, the burning of a CVS and the torching of a police car. But on the ground, a very different story unfolded — and these remarkable photos and videos are proof.
Source: mic.com
imprecisescience reblogged
I have a lot of respect for fan fiction… or as I like to call it, fiction.
Steven Moffat at Sherlocked
(via cumberfoil)
I’d hope so, considering he just participated in writing 3 series worth of a Sherlock Holmes AU and then there was that time with the Doctor Who crossover fic...
imprecisescience reblogged
datjukebird
condensation
Condensation
der-prinz-aus-stahl
cream
The best are the shirts with sayings:
preschtale
PEANUTBUTTERCHOCOLATEBAR MOTHERFUCKER
I fucking love the human race we’re all a bunch of dopes.
I saw a girl in Sydney wearing a shirt that said “bondage”
^^ I fail to see how that is unreasonable
imprecisescience reblogged
tranzient
FRANK
FRANK, MAN, YOU’RE ALIVE
I JUST…
I SAW THIS HANDBAG MAN
IT LOOKED JUST LIKE YOU.
OH FRANK I’M SO RELIEVED.
teapotsubtext
#this reminds me of John and Sherlock
I was going to be all ‘oh this fandom’ but like for fuck’s sake:
imprecisescience reblogged
talking about my 2nd favorite character: DON'T MAKE FUN OF HIM HE IS A DELICATE FLOWER AND MY SON STOP LAUGHING AT HIM YOU ARE HURTING HIS FICTIONAL FEELINGS
talking about my favorite character: lol look at my loser trash husband oh god he is so embarrassing i'm going to throw his ass to the wolves
imprecisescience reblogged
the lesson for today, class, is when to use epithets rather than names or pronouns — and when not to.
USE EPITHETS:
- when the character’s name is unknown, so there’s really no other way to refer to them:
Two goons in suits...
Those sex scenes where it’s like “John moaned as the detective---” and that’s it, that’s all I need to say, like YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE
imprecisescience reblogged
Any one of these would have been an improvement
honestly, that poor child
imprecisescience reblogged
Oh my god, look at that face.
Which one?
imprecisescience reblogged
It’s genuinely concerning that these are starting to make more sense to me than the show itself
imprecisescience reblogged
Belle has found her beast
Downton Abbey’s Dan Stevens is to play the beast in the upcoming live action version of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast:
he will play opposite to Emma Watson’s Belle:
Also, Luke Evans - from the Hobbit - has been casted to play the villain Gaston.
We're all just going to be in the audience like:
imprecisescience reblogged
I have a smauglock obsession don't judge
imprecisescience reblogged
forgodden-deactivated20200326
asip: 95% gay 2% sad tbb: 68% gay 20% sad tgg: 75% gay 19% sad asib: 89% gay 47% sad thob: 79% gay 50% sad trf: 70% gay 100% sad mhr: 50% gay 100% sad teh: 70% gay 80% sad tsot: 100% gay 90% sad hlv: 80-100% gay 88% sad the gay pilot: 100% gay 0% sad
the network: 65% gay 1% sad
the casebook: 80% gay 20% sad
John’s blog: 75% gay 65% sad
promo photos: 80-100% gay 80% sad
TSOT being the wedding episode is just--just--
poignant, brilliant and hilariously depressing. Something like that.
imprecisescience reblogged
I see. No you don’t.
imprecisescience reblogged
The first photo of Eddie Redmayne in Tom Hooper’s The Danish Girl.
squarecutorpearshape
When I scrolled over this too fast, I thought this was Jessica Chastain.