Avatar

@broomsticks / broomsticks.tumblr.com

leftsidedown on ao3. hp, wolfstar/multishipper, fic recs
Avatar
reblogged

Reblog this with a Wolfstar fic rec that is (a) not written by you and (b) under 300 kudos.

I'll go first...

Avatar
shipsnsails
Avatar

The midjourney stuff just reminds of when we were trying to find a new platform to host the ao3 donation form, and companies kept trying to tell me about all their "ai" features that would track donor engagement, and figure out the optimal pattern to email individual donors asking for follow up donations, and all the ways they suggest we manipulate people into staying on our websites. It was a great way to filter out who either wasn't listening to us when we described our ethics and donor base, or just didn't believe us.

Now granted ao3 is a unique case based on a) the amount of page views we get in any given time period and b) the fact that most donors absolutely do Not want to be identified as such anywhere, (the default "list of recent donors" module got nuked Immediately) but it surprised me some that the concept of "donors who value their privacy and would be furious at even the whiff of AI" is unique. Some of us really are just existing in different worlds.

The last part was kind of insane, honestly. When we started changing platforms for the donor database, I kept telling them that yes I was aware we already had an account for the volunteer database, and no that could not be connected to the donor database. And they said yes fine sure and then connected them anyway. And I called them back and said, excuse me, I'm confused, I can see both databases. And they said, well, yeah, but it's only you, someone has to be able to see both databases to give other users access. The other users can't see both. And I said, no, we have been asking for a completely separate database. I should not be able to see both. And they said, you are one organization, one organization can't have two databases. And I said, last year someone used our volunteer email list to commit approximately one thousand felonies. Please feel free to imagine how much worse it could have been had they had a way to use volunteers' email addresses to get their legal names. We do not want this to be something anyone can do no matter how much we trust them. Let me describe those felonies to you in more detail. And they emailed me two hours later and said, you can have two separate databases.

Avatar
kyraneko

This post feels like watching an iceberg go by in clear water. The amount of stuff going on beneath the surface of AO3 just astonishes.

Avatar
jeffsatyr

(ID in alt)

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
shisasan
I thought the earth remembered me, she took me back so tenderly, arranging her dark skirts, her pockets full of lichens and seeds. I slept as never before, a stone on the riverbed, nothing between me and the white fire of the stars but my thoughts, and they floated light as moths among the branches of the perfect trees. All night I heard the small kingdoms breathing around me, the insects, and the birds who do their work in the darkness. All night I rose and fell, as if in water, grappling with a luminous doom. By morning I had vanished at least a dozen times into something better.

Mary Oliver, Sleeping in the Forest

Avatar
Avatar
synebluetoo

Why would you hide that in the notes

Avatar
katy-l-wood

I want an ice maker and enough room in the freezer for a pizza and that is IT.

Avatar
libraford

I want the dumbest fridge you got. Gimme the orange tabby of refrigeration. I want my fridge to pull the wrong lever and turn my enemies into llamas instead of killing them. I want the following features: keeps things cold, has compartment that keeps things colder, a door that opens and shuts.

"Here at Stupid Jeff's Dumb Appliance Warehouse we sell the dumbest fucking appliances. Check out this fridge. This fridge won't ask you about your day, this dumb fucking fridge doesn't know what an Elon Musk is and won't fucking tell you what bullshit that dumb monkey is slapping into his phone today when you try to get some fucking milk. We took out all those "smart" electronics and in their place we put a loaded Glock 9mm that is put right up to that light that turns on when you open the door, which is the smartest thing in this fucking stupid fridge and let me tell you that fucker is on thin goddamn ice, if it gets too smart and tries to turn on before you open that door, the Glock will blow it to hell. Speaking of ice, this stupid fridge makes it. It makes ice, it keeps things cold, it comes with shelves. It's sturdy enough that when your ex comes back to your place looking for their stuff that they think they left behind like nine months ago and they know that you don't have it, but they wanted an excuse to come start a fight with you and throw a chair at your head but miss you and hit your fridge MICHAEL, this fridge will keep trucking because it gives zero shits and it only lives to keep things cold. Come to Stupid Jeff's Dumb Appliance Warehouse, if you ask us if we have an app, we break your kneecaps."

Avatar
reblogged

J. K. Rowling and Neil Gaiman are such a funny contrast to me, like Rowling: Oh, and by the way, I put gay characters in my books. People: Is there anything... showing that? Rowling: No. Also trans women don't deserve respect People: wtf Gaiman: Here are some immortals that transcend all human concepts of gender and attraction who use a variety of pronouns, and also some clearly canon human queers. People: Are the immortals queer? Gaiman: That is an entirely valid way to view them. Other people: Ugh, pushing a modern woke agenda. It used to be- Gaiman: Fuck you

Avatar
unicornbeck

Rowling made us believe that she believed in love, then slapped a bunch of conditions on it and savaged my loved ones. She broke my heart.

Gaiman picked me up, dusted me off, said, “it’ll be ok,” and ran me through with a flaming sword. Then he looked me in the eye and said, “don’t worry. I’m writing a happy ending. I’ll pull the sword out in a few years, one way or another.”

And I believe him, even though he’s a writer and writers, like demons, lie. Long live Neil Gaiman!

"and ran me through with a flaming sword. Then he looked me in the eye and said, “don’t worry. I’m writing a happy ending. I’ll pull the sword out in a few years, one way or another.”

OP what if I cry

Avatar
reblogged

I'm sorry if this is an odd think to ask to a published writer, but how do you stay motivated during bad mental health days?

Avatar

Well, the short answer is I don't.

For me, a big part of finding the wherewithal to get any writing done has been accepting that I can't ever "overcome" my disabilities through hard work and self-discipline (or other lies that the ableds made up to sell us day planners) and planning things accordingly. I try looking at it as an issue of accommodation; I built myself a sensory-friendly work space where I can be alone, I never commit to deadlines I know I'm not going to meet, and when I have bad days and can't get any work done I try to accept them as a fact of life instead of feeling guilty about them. Once I got to that place, things got a lot easier.

Getting there can be a hell of a journey--I've been doing this since I was 12 and I only put out my first book last year, and there's a huge emphasis on "try to" in that last point--but I figured something out and I'm a complete jackass so I'm sure there's hope for everyone.

Also I feel like I'm more fortunate than a lot of ND writers in that I've never had to struggle w/ attention deficits, but there's a post around here someplace that @thebibliosphere left some excellent commentary on regarding that problem specifically; I'll see if I can't find it

Avatar

I think you might be looking for my ADHD reward system? It should come up when searching my blog. (ADHD not required to benefit from using it. Executive dysfunction is a mother fucker that manifests in many forms. If ADHD life hacks help you, godspeed.)

Also, speaking as someone who worked myself into a prolonged bout of depression and suicidal ideation last year that I'm still not recovered from, I'm going to go ahead and say there are times when you need to take breaks for the sake of your mental wellbeing. And sometimes that includes accepting not having the mental energy to write at all.

Sometimes people need the creative outlet, and it can be healing and cathartic. Other times you run the risk of continuing to exhaust an already depleted energy source that desperately needs time to rest and heal.

Wich I know might not be particularly helpful if you've got a deadline looming, but again, as someone who severely fucked over their mental health last year by keeping to a deadline that was harmful to my wellbeing, I’m going to stress again that nothing is as important as doing what keeps you alive and sane. If things get done slower, they get done slower. The main thing is they get done, and you're able to (hopefully) enjoy it.

If you're in a place where it’s more “I don’t know how to jump-start my brain again,” start with small goals. 500 words a day, is more progress than 0.

Heck, 100 words is a whole-ass drabble.

Celebrate the things you do manage to do instead of the things you don’t. And if you don't manage to do anything today, there's always tomorrow. And the day after that, and the day after that.

Yes!!! All of this! And not just to writing, but to anything.

When somebody tells you that it’s okay to take time away if you need to, it’s never just about your physical health. There’s mental health, emotional health, the person who you want to (but aren’t ever required to) help with’s health, and even more that I probably don’t know or remember at this point.

I have a phrase that I commonly use when I don’t understand my emotions, and later was approved by a therapist. “Emotions are complicated.” What I mean by that is it can be hard to understand emotions, disabled in a way or not. Sometimes it’s harder for others, and that’s okay. But if I meant it just for me, I would of added “for me” at the end.

So if you feel like you can’t write some days, that’s perfectly okay and valid! You are NEVER required to work on a project you started, writing or something else. It’s meant to be for fun! It does not matter if you’re overwhelmed, having a bad day, just not up to it at the time, or something else. Take your time.

And sometimes it’ll end up lasting for several days. Sometimes you don’t feel good enough or up to doing the thing for days at a time. That’s okay. You’ll end up getting back at it. And if you don’t, then that’s alright too.

Doing something you enjoy should never feel like a chore or a requirement. Because then it’s not something you enjoy, even if it’s just at that time. Every single bit of you is worth more then whatever you enjoy doing.

(Ps. If something doesn’t work for you, don’t give up! Nobody is the same, so how you deal with things won’t be the same! Just because one thing doesn’t work for you won’t mean something else won’t. So keep trying different techniques to help, even if you don’t have that disability!)

Avatar

© VALERIO VINCENZO Website | Facebook | Twitter

I am American and I have never seen photos like this. I had no idea there are borders like this. Even though I LOVE the idea of open borders, I am staring at these pictures like “wait…people can just…walk across some stones or grass and BE IN ANOTHER COUNTRY??? and nobody stops them?? how does that WORK?!” So you can tell that my country’s propaganda has gotten to me by convincing me that this CAN’T work even though…it…obviously can. These pics just seem unreal to me. I’ve been taught my whole life that this can’t exist. In 27 years no one has ever sat me down and gone, look, here’s how it is elsewhere. It isn’t impossible at all.

I want to add something, but I’d just be restating what they said. I.. didn’t know peace and kindness like this was possible.

Avatar
morgaine2005

All of the above, and …

Why did the chicken cross the road?

To get to Belgium, apparently.

This also leads to some funny images like: GuEsS wHeRe ThE bOrDeR Is XD

this is real, but it also gets at why hopeful stories are so important - its real hard to make a better world if you cant even imagine it existing

Avatar
reblogged

You recently did Animorph Hogwarts Houses, and it reminded me of another sorting algorithm I was curious about. Where do you think the Animorphs fall on the MBTI/Kiersey Temperament Sorter? My personal theory is Jake: ESTP; Rachel: ESFP; Marco: ENTP; Cassie: INFP; Tobias: INFJ; Ax: tentative ISTJ (insofar as an alien can by analyzed under human temperaments); for a bonus, I'd put Visser 3: ESFP and Visser 1: INTJ, which have some nice interplay with their respective opponents (Jake and Marco)

Avatar

I do not use the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

I’m so sorry, because I know this is not the answer you were looking for, but I object really strongly to MBTI.  And as I psychologist I feel obligated to tell people why.  In a nutshell: it’s not valid, but most people don’t know that.  Personalities cannot be meaningfully sorted into types.  Anyone who says differently is selling something.  “Love Languages” is from a for-profit company.  “Learning Styles” is from a for-profit company.  “Left Brain/Right Brain” is perpetuated by for-profit companies.

The Myers-Briggs Foundation is a for-profit company.  Specifically, it is a for-profit company that uses junk science to sell tests to educational institutions and human resource managers.  People’s futures get directed by a test that doesn’t tell us a damn thing.  And part of the reason that happens is that MBTI successfully markets itself as a “validated” “tool” based in “science.”  Kind of like Goop or Scientology.

To be clear: Hogwarts Houses and Buzzfeed quizzes are also meaningless, but I still love playing around with because they are correctly treated as meaningless.  If “Design a Café to Find Out Which Power Ranger You Are” doesn’t give you the answer you want, you laugh and close the window and carry on with your life.  If you don’t like where the Sorting Hat puts you, you swap houses.  The Hogwarts Houses are even better because people tailor JKR’s own descriptions at will: Don’t think Hufflepuff has enough traits?  Great, add a few!  (And I am a particularly good finder, if anyone was wondering.  #badgerpride) Don’t like the description of Slytherins on PotterMore?  Okay, change it!  The author is dead and the Slytherins killed her!

Yes, those classifying tools are still selling something.  But we all know what we’re being sold: a series of children’s books.  Or the ad revenue from that flashing “Join AARP!” gif next to the item asking you to choose between cheddar and mozzarella for interior decorating.  MBTI, however, actively presents itself as a psychometric instrument rather than a revenue generator.  Which is misinformation.

My specific objection to MBTI is a little deeper than that, though.  Because it sorts people into types, and then markets those types as real science.

Sorting personalities into “introvert or extrovert” is the equivalent of inventing a measure of hair type that only has categories “long or short.”  If we say that the cutoff point for “long hair” a foot of hair, then we’re also saying that someone with a twelve-inch Afro and someone with no hair at all have more in common than someone with a twelve-inch Afro does with someone who has a thirteen-inch Afro.  We’re also failing to capture the people with asymmetrical hair, mullets, gender variability, hair loss, wigs, and like 99% of the variance in hair.

Extraversion is a spectrum.  Most people have some high-extraversion characteristics and some low-extraversion characteristics: Cassie dislikes loud parties but eventually works in public speaking, Marco loves being the center of attention but wants to be alone when making a major decision, Ax hates even the thought of social dominance but also gets lonely when he’s alone, etcetera.  And like hair length, extraversion changes over the lifespan.  Older adults tend to be more extroverted on average than younger adults, and people become more extroverted over the lifespan.  IMHO that’s good news, because it means that over time most of us will become less scared of calling strangers on the phone.  K.A. Applegate is right: experience might not make us wise, but it can remind us that we’ve survived such tribulations before.

MBTI has, I would argue, done actual harm in perpetuating the idea that people are one thing or the other.  Arbitrarily splitting spectra into categories doesn’t just fail to measure the variable of interest, but also actively fosters social divisions.  I see it all over Tumblr: people say “extroverts will never understand me” or “society is organized against introverts.”  That view puts others down and locks oneself into fixed mindset.  Sorting people into groups creates an automatic, reflexive preference for one’s own group.  Which often creates an equally reflexive desire to make one’s own group look better through making other groups look bad.  In reality, there is no such thing as “an introvert” or “an extrovert.” No more than there is such thing as “a tall” or “a short.”  Perpetuating that myth just generates new forms of intergroup judgment.

Additionally, MBTI comes from Ye Olde School of Thought in psychology where there was a lot of belief in typologies and the elitist assumption that Science Knows Best because non-scientists are dumbasses too id-driven to know their own minds.  Jung was doing the best he could, but he was also one of the people trying to fool test subjects with inkblots and word pictures to draw out their secrets.  Ergo, his test suffers from the same problems as the Kinsey Scale: it forces people into procrustean boxes, it allows for only limited outcomes, and it tries to “trick” people into endorsing certain typologies.  Contemporary psychologists not only talk about relative degrees of extraversion, but also (for instance) find out how much people like parties by asking how much they like parties.  Yes, there are certain preferences that tend to cluster together (party-lovers are more likely to enjoy public speaking) but it’s not a uniform construct by any stretch of imagination.

Honestly, the “introvert or extrovert” distinction is the most problematic, because scientifically speaking the others are just nonsensical.  Like, what does “judging or perceiving” even mean?  It seems kinda similar to the real personality trait of Openness, but as an attitudes and persuasion researcher I can tell you that EVERYONE judges pretty much EVERYTHING if given reason to do so.  And if they judge things, does that mean they have no perception?  Even people in comas have perception, so I guess all the “judgers” who aren’t “perceivers” are already dead…  Plus, the “thinking or feeling” one isn’t really tapping a spectrum at all.  Marco, I’ve argued, is high in both thinking and feeling, while Jake is pretty low in both.

So why does the MBTI get such widespread use, when the Big Five model remains relatively unknown in spite of being real science?  I think the biggest reason is that MBTI’s descriptions of the personality types are all written to appeal to the Barnum Effect: they’re just vague enough and contain just enough hedging that they can all describe anyone.

Let’s take Rachel Berenson as an example.  She’s definitely known to “enjoy the present moment, what’s going on around [her],” whether that’s dive-racing with Jake or coming off a good fight or even just flying around with Tobias, and she’s most certainly “loyal and committed to [her] values and the people who are important to [her],” whether that’s trying to kill David after he threatens Jordan or defending her best friend even when she knows that Cassie is wrong.  So according to MBTI, that makes her ISFP.

But hang on.  Rachel is also “frank, decisive” and willing to “assume leadership readily,” as well as “forceful in presenting [her] ideas” during group discussions, so I guess that makes her an ENTJ.  But Rachel also “takes a pragmatic approach focused on immediate results” because she “wants to act energetically to solve the problem” which we can see from her impatience to hit the yeerks where it hurts and worry about moralizing later.  So then she’d be ESTP.  However, Rachel’s got the “loyal, considerate, notice and remember specifics about people… concerned with how others feel” to a T, especially when we think about her matchmaking for Jake and Cassie or her ability to notice things that Tobias isn’t telling her, and she more than any of the others “strives to create an orderly and harmonious environment at work and at home” through actually keeping her room neat and putting care into all her personal spaces, so that makes her ISFJ.  So on and so forth.

Another reason that MBTI is popular is that it appeals to a Western desire to sort things into groups.  American education (and that in similar cultures like Australia) focuses on logic, classification, and creating borders.  It involves breaking things down into disparate parts to understand them better.  MBTI does that with human beings, and in a way that gives us easy answers.  And in the process it commits the Fundamental Attribution Error, comfortably assuring us that anyone who knocks a jar off a shelf is a klutz and not just momentarily distracted, while anyone who cuts us off in traffic is an asshole and not just trying to get their kids to school on time.  The reality is that personality is at least partially situation-dependent, and that personalities change over time.  The reality is that personality traits don’t cluster nicely into “types,” meaning that it’s only informative to look at patterns of change and relativity in context.

And MBTI misinforms people about that reality.  For money.

So MBTI isn’t just “the zodiac for Livejournal,” because businesses generally (I hope) don’t say “Hmmm, we already have three Tauruses on this team, let’s get a Pisces in here” when making decisions that can seriously impact the careers of human beings.  MBTI isn’t just “the zodiac for Livejournal” because astrology doesn’t actively perpetuate misinformation in a way that sows confusion and leads to mistrust for real science.  MBTI does more active harm that the zodiac ever will.  But people don’t know this, because the test markets itself so successfully.

Hogwarts Houses might classify people, but they’re silly and zero-stakes.  There are endless “what the hell is a Hufflepuff” jokes and open confessions about retaking the Sorting Hat quiz until it tells you what you want to hear.  And that’s how we should treat any measure that sorts people into types: as a fun and ultimately uninformative way for some company somewhere to turn a profit.

Avatar

First off, thanks for the response, and thanks as always for being honest, passionate, and detailed; discussing the issues without judging the people (except Michael Grant, because fuck him).

Second, for some context, I took two and a half psych classes before realizing that counseling was not something I could do for the rest of my life, took the easy way out, and switched to aerospace engineering.  All my other experience has been on the receiving end, dealing with my occasionally misfiring brain, so I have enormous respect for you experience, education, expertise, and accomplishments.

I’ll start by saying that I pretty much agree entirely with your points about the validity and potential harm of the MBTI.  I didn’t know how much financial motivation there was, given that my investment was three books that were probably less than $10 collectively from used book stores, but I certainly believe it.  Also, my first introduction to the test was a Facebook link from maybe 11 years ago, and I distinctly remember basically messing with my answers to see what resulted in a changed type.  Basically I hold no illusions of the descriptive capabilities of the MBTI, and reject any prescriptive or proscriptive capacity its adherents may claim.

All of that said, I want to offer my small counterpoint as to why I have a small soft spot for Keirsey, in particular.  Thanks to poorly understood messages from a religious upbringing (along with a fair amount of bullying and social isolation), I basically internalized the concept that I wasn’t allowed to have any sort of personality.  When I finally started receiving effective counseling in my early twenties, I was basically all over the place in terms of development.  In that setting, Keirsey’s work gave my an initial framework and vocabulary to start building some sense of personal identity with.  As with any theoretical framework, as the data came in, the framework was adjusted, and I developed a better understanding of myself beyond, and even contradictory to, that initial basic concept, but I feel that without the fairly simple starting point, it would have taken a lot longer to get where I am.

Again, I’m coming at this from the perspective of an engineer, where we commonly use models that we know don’t accurately represent the systems we’re working with (especially as students), but it allows us to make a start and build the necessary tools to come back and create a more accurate representation.  An inaccurate model can still be useful as long as its inaccuracies are recognized and accounted for, but no matter how much we love our models, it’s generally recognized that reality loves to not fit into our tidy little boxes.  Of course, human psychology is much more complex and intricate than nearly any system that engineers work with, and it requires much greater care than simple mechanical, electrical, or chemical processes.

At the end of the day, I’m glad I’m dealing with the relatively simple task of helping humanity reach other planets, and I’m glad people like you are working to make sure we have a humanity that is worthy of this planet, let alone others.

Also, thanks for pointing me towards the Five-Factor Model, I’ll have to check it out.

I was 1000% the same way as you: wandered into psychology out of curiosity and vague therapy intentions, realized pretty quickly that I have no counselor in me.  I did end up veering into the “creepily study human behavior through human experimentation” side of the field rather than leaving entirely, but nevertheless I Feel You.

I also spent somewhere between days and months when I was in undergrad writing detailed descriptions as to which MBTI profile best described each of my OCs the best.  I seriously think I sat there and took a free knockoff version of the MBTI a good twelve times for the twelve main characters of my original fiction series.  It wasn’t until I was in my 400-level Psychometrics class that I has a “Whaddayamean, the MBTI’s not valid?” moment.  If I recall correctly I spent a while hunting down more information in an effort to prove my professor wrong after he first told us that it wasn’t internally consistent, couldn’t predict human behavior, didn’t distinguish between personality types, and was unable to do 95% of what it promised.  Obviously I came around after I read more of the science, but obviously I’m also a contrarian little shit at heart.

Anyway, thank you for being so understanding that I had so much rambling about a test that no one has any reason to believe isn’t a valid personality measure.  Part of the reason I go on so much is that it really isn’t clear from any information I can find on a quick Google search that MBTI actually is for-profit junk science.  So it’s almost more reasonable to conclude that it’s valid than otherwise.  Often the only good information on psychological measures is in these fucking papers on how papers psychologists write about how the L2-MLM ANOVA with MLE after MNAR of the FAE suggests S1 processes within ELM/HSM are only quasi-reflexive in light of GSR-R yadda yadda so forth…*  The Giving Psychology Away movement is, shall we say, a work in progress.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
neil-gaiman

Hello Mr Gaiman. I am in year 11, so I've got my English GCSEs coming up, and my only issue is that I have no idea how to start a story. I can write the rest of the story perfectly fine, but I can never figure out how to start it off well. Do you have any advice?

It's ok if you don't respond, but if you do, thank you.

Avatar

Try to start it in an interesting way that makes people want to go on. A way that, perhaps, asks a question that you need to keep reading to answer, or that will mean something else if you come to it after finishing the story.

Sometimes I write the beginning of the story, the opening lines, last of all.

It can be a fun exercise to just sit and write for yourself first lines of stories that are interesting and make people want to keep reading. They don't have to be any good, and you definitely don't need to know what happens next.

'Everything would have been fine if the Pope had not misplaced the antique silk alms bag containing her birth control pills.'

'The day Julius's mother died was, by no coincidence, the same day that Julius discovered his Jack Russell terrier secretly spoke Italian.'

'The old house squatted on the hill like a toad on the edge of a well, and, like a toad, would occasionally, when unobserved, lumber down from the hill in search of food. It was not choosy. It would eat anything."

Try it. It's fun.

Avatar
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.