June 2 was a blessed day
Harley is a gift from God.
This is why Harley is like my all time favorite!
Why did they leave out the best part of this scene?;
The character development of Harley is probably one of the better things DC has done with their characters.
That last line :((((
There is more:
The fact that she actually had a plausible reason for the muzzle makes this even better.
Harley is a blessing
I always low-key suspect that Dinah would trust Harley to babysit if she really needed someone.
It’s why I see Harley better as an Anti-hero.
I don’t like this characterization as a whole, but she has her moments, this being one of them.
Tbh i just think of her as chaotic neutral. I mean, she sorta moves back and forth between good and evil, sometimes rapidly, but she never really sticks to one
This is why Harley is one of the most amazing DC characters of all time.She has REAL character development.
OH MY GOD
iS THAT….???????
Reblog this if you will be including ace/aro spec people in pride month.
real discourse
do you wear shoes inside the house, walk barefoot or wear flipflops?
We call everything on the ice “love”.
these are three completely different characters.
And you thought disney was bad
i wasn’t originally gonna say anything about this because i know it’s more or less a funny observation but i feel the need to point a few things out homestuck(mspaintadventures) sprites are placeholders, a style of art that is meant to be as generic as possible so that artists are free to interpret their features as they will. dark hair, glasses, this outfit, the rest is up to you. they are even canonically aracial and their bodytypes have been known to change in-comic. that’s what this means. homestuck(mspaintadvendtures) is also, despite it’s popularity, an indie comic that isn’t as widespread as it seems to be. disney is a multi-billion dollar legacy corporation that has been around for generations. whether they wanted to or not, every children’s movie they put out sets an example and a standard for impressionable young children. so when they make the same generic, big-eyed, small mouthed, round cheeked, small chinned white girls as every protag or female lead, it becomes a major issue, because it’s a beauty standard that very few people can actually adhere to. so yeah, disney and their current direction in character design is still worse than this.
Holy shit
I’m not a Homestuck fan, but isn’t one of them an alternate version of the protag???
no he’s an alternate version of the protags biological father
oh also the third character (Jude Harley) is the HALF-BROTHER of the first character (John Egbert) they look similar because THEY ARE ALL RELATED.
This blog supports Asexuals!
yeah quick question why is Tuckington not called Washer
Probably the same reason Tucklix isn’t called Fucker
thats EXACTLY WHAT IT SHOULD BE CALLED
What’s it like being on of the only females in Achievement Hunter?
i just remembered people with penises can’t have multiple consecutive orgasms ohhjhhh my g OD HAHAHAHHKDFHAH
Well people with vaginas have periods so I think y’all deserve all the orgasms you want
that’s….really sweet… omfg
This post is also inclusive of transgender people this is the most positive post be seen all week
this is so sad yet important
12 or under. Think about it.
Even with this, men will still say that most women find it innocent and like the ‘compliments’
Well, looks like Grif joined Geoff on sabbatical
That was legitimately my first thought.
would it kill historians to say “yeah these ancient romans wouldn’t have thought of themselves as ‘gay’ in modern terms” (sure, whatever) without calling the existence of gay people “our current cultural baggage”
Also, these ancient romans would not have thought of themselves as ‘straight’ because the concept ‘straight’ didn’t exist yet.
They did not call the places where their empire met other empires ‘borders’ because the concept ‘borders’ didn’t exist yet.
They would not have found us ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ because because those words and concept didn’t exist yet.
See also the roman concept of a chair, of a family, of very damn near EVERYTHING. And that’s before you start considering all the concepts they did have that we don’t. You can either put a disclaimer of EVERYTHING, every damn time, or you have to wonder why only sexual and gender diversity are contextualized out of existence.
Do I need to say something?
Nah.
he knew he knew exactly what he was doing
SLOW CLAP
I had to reblog it twice
sORRY BUT THIS IS AMAZING
It’s from The New Yorker. It’s satire.
j