Avatar

Formerly The Illuminated Witch

@samwisethewitch / samwisethewitch.tumblr.com

Sam | she/her, they/them | Author, witch, pagan, poet, activist, and certified geek girl. Queer af. Witchcraft For Everyone is available now!! | TERFs DNI
Avatar

About Me

Hi, I'm Sam! (she/they) I'm a queer witch, pagan, and author of two books and counting. I mostly post about witchcraft and paganism with a focus on inclusive, antiracist, feminist, and queer-and-trans-affirming practices. I also occasionally post about other religions or occult topics and, more recently, about slow and intentional living.

I am not ordained clergy in any religion, and I do not claim any authority outside my own study, practice, and research. While I am happy to share resources with others, I encourage you to always get a second opinion.

FAQ

Q: What type of witchcraft do you practice?

A: I practice an eclectic mix of modern secular witchcraft and Southern + Southern Appalachian folk magic. I also incorporate some European folk traditions, particularly from England, Ireland, and Scotland, but that's a much smaller part of my practice.

Q: What type of paganism do you practice?

A: I sort of struggle to label my personal practice because it's, well, personal. A lot of my practice is based on personal experience and trial and error. That being said, I'm a member of the Reclaiming Tradition and deeply resonate with the Reclaiming Principles of Unity. My practice also has a lot of elements of Norse Heathenry and Irish Polytheism. I am married to a practitioner of Religio Romana, so I also occasionally post about Roman and Hellenic polytheism, as they are also part of our little household cultus.

Q: Where can I buy your books?

A: Both of my books are currently available on Amazon. You can get Witchcraft For Everyone, an introduction to secular witchcraft, here. You can get Sacred Choice, an exploration of the religious history of abortion and birth control, here.

Q: Can you do a tarot reading for me?

A: I am currently not offering tarot readings or any other services.

Q: Can you recommend a book about [insert occult topic here]?

A: I've already posted a masterlist of beginner-friendly resources, and I encourage you to check it out for my recommendations. I've also posted a masterlist of authors to avoid, to help newcomers avoid misinformation.

Q: Why haven't you posted about [insert latest human rights abuse here]? Do you not care about using your platform to spread awareness?

A: I have recently made the decision to block several bigotry, hate, and -ism related tags on social media to prevent doomscrolling every time I log on. For me, it's healthier to check the news once a week than to constantly be reading about human suffering. I've talked about this in other places, but my day job involves working directly with survivors of violence. As you can imagine, that uses up a lot of my energy, and in order to avoid compassion fatigue and burnout I'm trying to keep my social media more lighthearted. This is a personal boundary I have set for my own mental well-being, and does not reflect a lack of concern about current world events.

Q: Do you have any other social media?

A: I have a book/fandom side blog here on Tumblr at @samwisethebitch, where I largely post about fiction I enjoy. Fair warning, horror is one of my favorite genres, so if gore or disturbing imagery isn't for you, you might want to skip that side blog. I also have a fiber arts side blog at @samwisethestitch where I post about my sewing projects.

I also occasionally post short-form video content on Instagram at @samwisethewitch and TikTok at @authorsamwise. I try to remember to repost those videos on this blog, but I'm bad about forgetting to share them here.

Avatar
reblogged

BOY, I SAY BOY, YOU GOTTA LOOK AT WHERE YOUR INFORMATION IS COMMIN' FROM! SOME OF THESE HERE FOLKS ARE READIN' BOOKS MADE BY POWER HUNGRY EDGELORDS WHO ARE DOWNRIGHT MEAN TO THE FOLKS THEY'RE TAKIN' IDEAS FROM! Put down that crystal when I'm talkin' to you boy. NOW, LISTEN, I SAY LISTEN, IT'S FINE TO GET IDEAS FROM FOLKS IN OTHER PLACES, BUT FOR CRYIN' OUT LOUD, SAY YA GOT IT FROM THE POOR FOLKS!

Avatar

taylor swift’s work wouldn’t be nearly as insufferable if she wasn’t constantly trying to present herself as some sort of tortured underdog. like, okay, she has endured hardships, and a lot of people, especially white men, are shitty towards her for purely misogynistic reasons. that sucks, i agree. but she’s never been an underdog before. she was born to well-off parents who did everything they could to start her music career when she was barely even a teenager, an opportunity that lots of people would kill for. now she’s extremely famous and wealthy, and everything she releases is destined to sell millions of copies and receive glowing reviews in nearly every publication. she is not an underdog, and i have trouble believing she’s particularly “tortured.” she’s not even an alcoholic, despite claiming to be one on the opening track of her new album! people like to defend her lyrics by saying she’s just playing a character, which i don’t believe for a second, but even if she was, i don’t think i want to listen to someone like swift play the character of a tortured underdog, not when there’s so many musicians out there who are actually tortured underdogs. it comes across as hollow. “you wouldn’t last an hour in the asylum where they raised me,” sung by one of the wealthiest, most famous, most critically acclaimed musicians in the world, who was born to loving parents who personally helped her start her career, who once said she’d never been to therapy because she “just feels very sane.” if you’re going to play a character, maybe pick one who we’re not supposed to pity.

Avatar
reblogged

Sometimes people demand you justify being an atheist with a 200 page well-sourced thesis on biblical scholarship but one of the reasons I am not a Christian anymore is so fucking simple. It made my life worse. It made me unhealthy mentally. I’ve grown one thousand times more as a person without it. If it were really the one true wisdom from an all knowing infinite god, it would make my life better. And that’s enough proof for me. And it’s a valid reason.

Avatar

Was reading about indigo children yesterday (researching for an essay on new age scams) and I realized that the idea was popularized in the late 1990s and early 2000s, which means the kids whose parents labeled them "indigo children" are probably in their 20s and 30s now. And I'm soooooo curious about how that affected them.

So: Do I have any followers whose parents labeled them an "indigo child" growing up? If so, I'd love to know how that label affected your identity and self-esteem growing up. And if you were diagnosed with some form of neurodivergence later.

Avatar
Avatar
asyipyip

I can’t get over this lmaooo

Avatar
catgirlhell

ok, after actually looking up the term and doing some goddamn research (my goodness somebody on the internet actually decided to look something up before forming an opinion, dear god what a day), i can pretty safely say that everyone hitting this post with the “that’s just a friendship!” bit is wrong! and i can explain why! i myself didn’t get this initially! but after looking into it, i realized that it’s mainly due to the framework i was thinking in! Yeah, there’s actually merit to what these people are saying, this is stuff that’s been considered and these are indeed terms that exist! they were also coined by ace people specifically to describe their relationships! So what gives? What does Queerplatonic Relationship mean? well i certainly fucking didnt get it at first, but it stems from attempting to define a kind of relationship that there arent really words for in the standard english lexicon! the poster above me is a TERF, and wherever i see myself agreeing with a terf i also see that there’s possibly some flaw in my logic or understanding of the thing. Basically (mind you this is only some very cursory and basic research, just type the term into google lol), QPR’s are a way of defining a relationship that has many of the same obligations and aspects of a traditional romantic relationship, without any of the explicitly romantic parts that come with having a spouse or romantic partner.

the idea of living in the same place, or jointly bringing up children, and performing many other tasks as a kind of unit that society would often mislabel as something done by two romantic partners in a union of some kind (i use that term to loosely define an exclusive relationship, not actual binding marriage, though this can include such). the idea of the QPR isn’t just “friends”, it’s very specifically “individuals in a platonic relationship that perform a number of the social aspects of a traditional romantic partnership”.

like, be real for a second. if someone described their relationship with someone to you and said “Yeah we own a house together, we have a kid that we adopted and take care of, we decided to get a dog last week and we file taxes as two members of the same household.”, you wouldn’t look at that person and assume that they arent romantic/sexual partners of some kind, because... well, traditionally, that’s shit that married people do. getting hit with the additional “Yup! And we’re not romantically or sexually involved at all! She has a boyfriend that she visits on the weekends and I’ve never had a romantic relationship in my life.” would throw you for a goddamn loop! What would you even call that relationship? and that’s where the term comes from: an attempt to define a very specific kind of relationship that certainly can and has existed, but isn’t commonly recognized or talked about!

so i think everyone shitting on these folks owes them an apology, i know i personally do for making assumptions that clearly weren’t true!

Actually QPR was coined by aromantic people but asexual people do also use it!

Avatar
shadowkat678

Finally I have a reason to reblog this after cringing every time it's come across my dash.

Avatar
reblogged

I woke up this morning to a formal cease and desist from a certain publishing company that publishes books by a certain author. In compliance with that cease and desist, I have deleted the posts they took issue with. I will not be discussing this issue on social media again. Anyone with further questions is welcome to message me privately.

On an unrelated note: A cease and desist only affects the person it is addressed to. I can't control whether or not other people continue to post about this issue.

Avatar

I woke up this morning to a formal cease and desist from a certain publishing company that publishes books by a certain author. In compliance with that cease and desist, I have deleted the posts they took issue with. I will not be discussing this issue on social media again. Anyone with further questions is welcome to message me privately.

Avatar

Something I've been thinking about lately: In conversations about being intentionally child-free, I see a lot of people talk about how much they resent constantly being told that they'll change their minds someday. And yeah, that sucks. When you tell someone that they'll regret their choices or go back on them someday, you're telling them you don't trust them to make their own decisions. And that's a dick move.

But what I see left out of a lot of these conversations is the fact that some people do change their minds about kids, and that is also okay.

People change. Our priorities and our values change. Someone identifying as child-free at 20 and then realizing at 30 that they actually do want to be a parent doesn't invalidate other people's decision not to have kids. It doesn't even invalidate that person's previous decision. They're growing. They're changing, and that's okay. Healthy even.

When I was 18, I felt very strongly that I would never marry and never have children. For me, this was a reaction to growing up in a religious environment where women were second-class citizens, and what little autonomy/independence single women had immediately went away when they got married. And once you had kids? Well, once you had kids, your personal life was officially over and your identity now started and ended with being so-and-so's mother.

If your only model of marriage and parenthood is a nuclear family where the husband is in charge and makes all of the decisions while his wife does all of the housework and childcare and not much else, OF COURSE you wouldn't want to get married or have kids! My thought process at 18 was basically, "Well, I want to have my own money and make my own choices and have an identity outside of being a mom, so clearly the family life isn't for me."

I'm 25 now. I'm married. My husband and I both kept our own last names, and we maintain separate bank accounts. I have a job that I'm good at, and a lot of people know me from my work. I still have my own money, make my own choices, and have my own identity. None of that went away when I got married. All that's changed is that I have a partner and best friend that I decided to do life with, and we had a ceremony and signed a piece of paper to make it official. We're not quite at the having kids stage yet, but it is something we both want someday.

Me wanting marriage and kids now doesn't invalidate my decision at 18. When I was 18, focusing on my education and career was absolutely the right choice for me. I needed to be able to focus on myself without considering how it would affect a spouse or kids. Eventually, I realized marriage and parenthood can look a lot of different ways. I realized I can decide what they look like for me. I don't have to follow the model I grew up with. And I realized I do want raising kids to be part of my life, just in a way that looks different from what others might expect.

This is a process a lot of people go through, especially women and femmes. If you're in the middle of it right now, just know that you're allowed to change.

And of course, a lot of people don't change their minds. A lot of people who identify as child-free at 20 still don't want kids at 30, 40, or 50. I've met people in their 80s and 90s who never had kids and don't regret that decision. My point here is that some people changing their minds about something doesn't mean it's not a good option for other people.

(And, let's be real, unfortunately a lot of people go the other way: they think they want kids until they have them. That's way more complicated because now there's a whole human person involved who is dependent on them for care and this definitely deserves its own post, but the best advice I can give is if you're young, you need to give yourself time to figure out what you want before committing to anything.)

Avatar
reblogged

drives me up a wall living in a very very red district, like “no democrat is ever going to win any local election, let alone a real leftist” district, like “our school board members ran on who was the most anti-mask” red, like “I pass white supremacist signs on the way to buy weed” red

and being in the local leftist community and the guy who runs the anarchist book club and the lady who helps keep the warming shelters open and the people who marched on city hall when a local business was getting death threats for having a drag show are all members of a discord and we get on this discord and have frank discussions about how best to vote

the people who do the protests and the mutual aid and all the real work

going “okay, they’re both fascists, but this one lacks ambition and seems happy to just glide in the position” or “they both suck, but this one can be reasoned with if you frame it patriotically enough” like we don’t even have a democrat to vote for. we know what a vote is. we know what we hope accomplish with it. we know what it can do, and we know what it can’t.

and going from those discussions to here where people think that your vote is some kind of fucking??? enabling maneuver??? as if someone isn’t going to end up in that seat regardless of what you do???

we didn’t build this system, we just live in it. we’re just trying to survive. a vote isn’t a statement of your values, it’s not an endorsement, it’s not a marriage contract, it’s a strategic play you make to keep alive.

the biggest mistake I see leftists making is overestimating their own popularity. “well but everyone would be leftist if they just-“ no, stop, 1) you can’t possibly know that 2) everyone will not just

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.