Avatar

@yourstrulylilypotter

Kat- wishes she was a gryffindor is probably a non-confrontional hufflepuff instead// TERFS not welcome you can see yourself out
Avatar

If you don't think that Zionist spaces--even and especially liberal uwu smol bean Zionist spaces--are absolutely rife with anti-Arabism and Islamophobia,

please consider that might be because anti-Arabism and Islamophobia have been normalized for you all your life to the point where you don't even notice them.

Please listen to Arabs and Muslims who point it out.

The major way that liberal zionists perpetuate anti-Arabism and Islamophobia is by normalizing and invisiblising the violence inherent in the status quo.

Talking about Israel and Palestine as if they were parties on an equal footing, with equal power.

Refusing to name genocide for what it is and insisting that ~~the situation~~ is something people can reasonably debate. Like it's an intellectual exercise and not the violent subjugation and elimination of a people.

Israel is a genocidal Apartheid state and to pretend otherwise is to become complicit in the violence it inflicts.

Avatar
fairuzfan

I agree, but also an equally insidious aspect is lending credence to "soft zionism" by engaging with or validating their feelings.

This to me, is just as bad because it often uses progressive language to blur the lines between ideologies and actions — for people who use vague words in times when preciseness is needed, promoting certain talking points when they have very little relevance to the issue at hand — they fully understand what they're doing by distracting and equivocating but when you point it out, the topic is changed or shifted beyond what is actually needing to be discussed.

Liberal zionists are quite good at this, they always talk around the issue (ie: genocide/colonization) and very rarely touch on the actual issue — when they do, it rarely is from the perspective of actually engaging with narratives they're not willing to examine with and instead only about things they personally feel comfortable sharing/disseminating.

Avatar
Avatar
bonivers

this this this

Avatar
fishelfe

THIS THIS THIS

they're not MEANT to have longevity. they're meant to be exciting for 5 minutes and then forgettable as soon as netflix releases their next bingeable dopamine source, which you're then also supposed to forget in favor of the next thing. streaming services aren't trying to make cult classics or beloved cultural artifacts, they're trying to sell you a new show each month so you don't cancel your subscription. it's the TV equivalent of fast fashion.

Avatar
Avatar
gentlewave

A Lady playing a Stringed Instrument, early 19th century, Qajar, Iran, oil on canvas, 127.5 x 102 cm, private collection, source: christies.com.

Avatar
Avatar
penrosesun

PSA: Don't use Open Office

I keep seeing people recommending Open Office as an alternative to Word, and uh... look, it is, technically, an open source alternative to Word. And it can do a lot of what Word can, genuinely! But it is also an abandoned project that hasn't been updated in nine years, and there's an active fork of it which is still receiving updates, and that fork is called LibreOffice, and it's fantastic.

Seriously, if you think that your choices are either "grit your teeth and pay Microsoft for a subscription" or "support free software but have a kind of subpar office suite experience", I guarantee that it's because you're working with outdated information, or outdated software. Most people I know who have used the latest version of LibreOffice prefer it to Word. I even know a handful of people who prefer it to Scrivener.

Open Office was the original project, and so it has the most name recognition, and as far as I can tell, that's really the only reason people are still recommending it. It's kind of like if people were saying "hey, the iPhone 14 isn't your only smart phone option!" but then were only ever recommending the Samsung Galaxy S5 as an alternative. LibreOffice is literally a version of the same exact program as Open Office that's just newer and better – please don't get locked into using a worse tool just because the updated version of the program has a different name!

Avatar
neil-gaiman

I use LibreOffice. It's wonderful.

Avatar
Avatar
tamamita

Theodore Herlz, father of Political Zionism: Yeah, it's colonial

Ber Borochov, father of Labour Zionism: Yeah, it's colonial

Ze'ev Jabotinsky, father of Revisionist Zionism: Yeah, it's colonial

David Ben Gurion, founding father of the Settler state: Yeah, it's colonial

Small bean fandom Zionist: Umm, lol, it's literally not colonial???

Relevant quotes:

Herzl wrote to Cecil Rhodes, "It doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews… How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial...

Theodore Herzl's letter to Cecil Rhodes from unpublished letters by Theodore Herzl (11th of January 1901)

"The Jews could in short time assume the leading position in the economy of the new land. Jewish migration must be transformed from immigration into colonization"

Poale Zion, Our Platform, B. Borochov (1906)

"We cannot offer any adequate compensation to the Palestinian Arabs in return for Palestine. And therefore, there is no likelihood of any voluntary agreement being reached. So that all those who regard such an agreement as a condition sine qua non for Zionism may as well say "non" and withdraw from Zionism. Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population"

Iron Wall, Ze'ev Jabotinksy (1923)

If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?”

David Ben Gurion, quoted in The Jewish paradox, Nahum Goldmann (1973)

Let's not leave out Avraham Stern who charmingly referred to the Palestinians as a slave race to the master race, Jewish people like himself.

Avatar

the reason it is necessary to educate yourself on colonialism and specifically on settler colonialism is that it is very easy to be stupid and think about asymmetric power as bad strategic decisions in a war, like the average blue-check replying "FAFO" under every palestinian death toll. there is some kind of comfort in believing that a colonial power can be out-strategized or appealed to and that palestinians somehow have been making the same strategic mistakes for 75 years which is why they're being genocided (this is what stupid people believe and evil people are trying very desperately to get stupid people to believe)

but once you understand it is a colonial struggle and not a war, patterns begin to emerge. no colonized people "lost" a war because no colonized people have ever asked for a war nor have they engaged in one. colonialism imposes war upon indigenous people. colonizers come to you in your home, where you are a civilian, and force a fighter out of you. every civilian is now engaged in an existential struggle simply due to the bad luck of existing in a home coveted by colonizers.

many complexities have been manufactured to disguise this simple truth. but across the world—in canada, in algeria, in south africa, in the united states, in australia, in lebanon, in the philippines, in hawaii, in puerto rico, in argentina, in sudan, in india, in every region that has experienced colonialism (and that is almost every region in the world) this remains the base truth of it. and it is also instinctively why everyone recoils at the images of idf soldiers gleefully dancing on the ruins of gaza. it doesn't look like victory in war, does it? there's no honor nor achievement in it. the more they kill, the ease with which they do it, more obvious it is. it looks like what it is.

"The social and economic institutions founded by the early Zionists, which were central to the success of the Zionist project, were also unquestioningly understood by all and described as colonial. The most important of these institutions was the Jewish Colonization Association (in 1924 renamed the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association)....

Palestinians have been accused by those who sympathize with their oppressors of wallowing in their own victimization. It is a fact,  however, that like all indigenous peoples confronting colonial wars, the Palestinians faced odds that were daunting and sometimes impossible. It is also true that they have suffered repeated defeats and have often been divided and badly led. None of this means that Palestinians could not sometimes defy those odds successfully, or that at other times they could not have made better choices.³¹ But we cannot overlook the formidable international and imperial forces arrayed against them, the scale of which has often been dismissed"

Excerpts from: "The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017" by Rashid Khalidi

Avatar

We lost something as a culture when computers stopped screaming in agony as you connected them to the internet.

You would not have survived the dark ages. A webring would spell great peril. There was no search. And the dark things lurked out in the open in those days.

The computer screamed because it knew.

Avatar
lin-squiggly

if it didn't torture a landline phone for the duration of the process, was it really internet?

My dad hit me with the info that there was an option to turn it off... the sound... the whole time. But he didn't want to tell me. Or to stop me from the, presumably character building, ritual of struggling to smother it to death with a pillow at 12:30am so I could be on the Forbidden Web and not wake my parents.

Avatar
morgenlich

time for one of my favorite tweets

Avatar

girl typing a very specific question into google search bar, scrunching her face as she takes time to make sure she hasn't made any spelling errors, hitting enter, shaking her head as google only presents her with unhelpful websites that don't answer her query at all, moving her cursor back to the search bar and clicking on it so she can carefully write 'reddit' at the end, hitting enter again, sighing with relief as she finds a link to a reddit post asking the exact question she needed answered posted in a subreddit for a very niche topic, finally moving her cursor to click on the link, wondering why she didn't go straight to the subreddit earlier, only to be met with a deleted comment with a reply from the OP stating 'that was very helpful, thanks', sighing with frustration as she moves her cursor back to the search bar so she can copy the link and paste it into the wayback machine,

Replace "reddit" with "reveddit" in any reddit url to reveal deleted or removed comments. If the comment/post was deleted too quickly after it was posted, it may not pull it up, but it works most of the time

girl after reading a post on tumblr dot com with a reblog by user impossiblepackage, moving her cursor over to the url of the aforementioned reddit post, using her mouse to highlight the word “reddit”, typing out the word “reveddit” in its place, hitting enter, waiting with bated breath as reveddit loads, finally content as the deleted comment is displayed in front of her eyes containing the information she sought for so long.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

you not faulting whatever a person who has been through does because there isn’t enough revenge in the world isn’t a dangerous route to go down? doesn’t it keep a cycle of violence going? you really wouldn’t be angry if you or people you loved got hurt by someone and they justified it cause they were angry and hurt? isn’t that kind reasoning used by people who caused problems and death of innocents in the first place???

it's not that i do not fault it or justify it, it's that i understand it. it is quite centrally the problem of building a future of compounding tragedies.

that said i don't believe we are in a cycle of violence you're imagining in the first place. the violence happening now is not retributive, it is calculated. the violence that has happened in our region over the past 75 years was never retributive. palestinians didn't cause the holocaust, iraqis didn't cause 9/11, and no people (whether yemeni, libyan, syrian or sudanese) ever caused violence to the armies, groups and militias that subsequently obliterated them. any actual retribution that happened within these narratives was incidental, but in all cases the true goal (for israelis, for americans, for the various arab dictators) was gain and power and the real vehicle for violence was previous violence that went unpunished. the darfur genocide laid the path to the current war in sudan, the war in syria laid the path for everything from gaza to ukraine, the war on terror much the same. in all cases it was impunity laying the path for worse.

the cycle of violence happening here is not "an eye for an eye" violence and then revenge for it. it's the normalization of violence as currency. it's violence as communication and violence as a language. if nobody is speaking any other language, how do we communicate? how are people to be heard again? if you only hear the ones who take up arms, what is the point of putting them down?

you imagine that we would keep a cycle of violence going, but in fact the cycle of violence is already going whether we want it to or not. it is in motion and we are already caught up in it. do you think anything would change if everyone here unilaterally laid down arms and promised peace? but most of this region already isn't fighting at all, it is subjugated, and yet violence has only ever increased. this is why i understand, and primarily why you don't. you think you're not in the cycle of violence until there's a terrorist attack somewhere unrelated, but you are already in it. it's called a war machine for a reason. nobody's opting in or out.

and yes, you are likely innocent and in this case i would be too. that's the point i am trying to articulate. in fact there's no revenge for something like this anyway. there really isn't. the things people have lost cannot be replaced and those that took them have nothing of equal value to give. palestinians who get their homes back can never be compensated for the 75 years of exile and loss. even that kind of justice is minimal. the same is true for all the political prisoners who lost years and lives in prison, for all the refugees who fled wars and repression and died in exile. putting those dictators and their soldiers on trial and in prison won't compensate these losses, but it does prevent it from continuing. it is the most minimal ask of justice, to create the conditions for people to move on.

most people in this region have historically had a huge capacity for forgiveness, and a huge desire for stability. in the right conditions they will always choose the path of least resistance because people are exhausted. but the opportunity to give forgiveness isn't even there. the conditions to make peace, to rebuild, to coexist are being taken from us. if there's no justice and no accountability either, then there's nothing left except violence. in this region the cycle of violence is a cycle of tragedy. each tragedy emboldens a bigger one. the same people pay the price every time, and the same people benefit every time. do you understand? the work we have to do is creating the conditions for justice, and that isn't possible until you truly understand what happens without it.

Avatar
Avatar
Twice a week, a group of women gather together in a nondescript house in Ardamata, on the outskirts of Geneina in Sudan’s West Darfur state, to tell their stories to each other, cry, and drink coffee.
The women, who work or used to work in education, are all survivors of an ethnically targeted campaign of rape and sexual abuse carried out by fighters from Arab militias backed by the Rapid Support Forces paramilitary group on 5 November, after the fall of the army garrison in Ardamata.
Most of the rape campaign’s victims were from the Masalit community, a darker-skinned ethnic African tribe that made up a majority in Geneina before they were largely driven out during fighting that began in April last year.
The survivors’ group was founded by Mariam Abdulkarim (not her real name), an Arab former high school teacher, without any funding or professional training. She said she was gang-raped on 5 November by men who saw her carrying her three-year-old son, who has dark skin on account of her estranged husband.
“They told me ‘you gave yourself to that nawab [slave]. We will take our turn too or we will kill your son’,” Abdulkarim said in an interview in her kitchen, while she cooked rice with dried meat over coals. [...]
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.